Thursday, February 24, 2022

The God Culture: Soul and Spirit: Where Do We Go When We Die? Part 3

Timothy Jay Schwab of The God Culture's series about the afterlife is pretty massive and cannot really be distilled into a few articles but I shall do my best. The last article dismissed three of the videos in his series as totally irrelevant. In this article I want to look at his definition of soul and spirit. Spoiler alert: they are the same. But are they really? 

Tim is very straightforward about the nature of man. Man is composed of body and spirit only.

What Is The Soul? Where Do We Go? Part 6 Answers In 2nd Esdras 23F 

10:11 We are not triune beings in either sense. We are made of really a body and a spirit which is the soul in many scriptures equated and we're going to show you so don't worry. The two are interchanged and we'll show you.


20:34 So, the spirit and soul cannot be separated into a definition of a triune being nor can they be separated in any way. They are the same in representation, see? The soul as an essence, well, that's direct new age occult, uh, basically, uh, it, it, I mean it could be better than that because it's the breath of life, okay? You could, you know, you could go there but even the word as an essence, I mean that's it just sounds so new agey it's just weird to look at that in the middle of a definition here. 

What an incredibly stupid statement. Tim has no idea what accidents and essences are. They have nothing to do with the new age or the occult. This is incredibly dumb. 

What is the soul? It is our life force.
22:40 Our soul is our being, our life force, our spirit, indeed.

Tim's main argument is that the term translated soul and spirit is general and means a multitude of things. Therefore you cannot pin down any one definition. While that is not necessarily false the fact is that simply because the word translated heart, soul, mind, spirit, and understanding can mean a wide variety of things does not mean the that they are all the same and interchangeable. It's really odd that Tim, in this video only covers ONE GREEK WORD which is G5990, psyche.


Actually it's not odd because Tim's modus operandi is to throw a lot at his listeners to make it seem as if he has covered everything when in fact he has barely scratched the surface and twisted the information he is using. There are three other words he did not cover, dianoianous, and cardia. They are translated mind, understanding, and heart respectively. Matthew 22:37 would then read as follows:

Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy KARDIA, and with all thy PSYCHE, and with all thy DIANOIA.

Why does Jesus use three different words if they all mean the same thing? It would be as silly as saying, "I am going for a drive in my car, horseless carriage, and automobile." You only need one word. 

As important as getting the definition of words correct is, I don't want to quibble over that here and I will not be ferreting out Greek definitions. There are two ways to show what Tim is saying is absolutely wrong and that the spirt/mind/heart is not the same thing as the soul.

The first way to show that Tim is wrong is by analyzing what he says in video 9 about spiritual death. Tim vehemently disagrees with the standard interpretation of God threatening death upon eating from the tree of knowledge to mean that Adam died spiritually. One cannot die spiritually except on the day of judgement says Tim. 

13:27 Your spirit can't die because you sin. Now, you can eternally set your position that you will be in hell, that you will die, yes, but that's not what the Bible does here. It's not playing these word games of dumb scholars that just don't get it. It doesn't do it. So, spirits don't die not unless they are consumed with eternal fire period. That is the only measure in scripture for so-called spiritual death. We do not die spiritually when we sin. Our spirits can't die. It can set it up sure but the Bible doesn't do that there and that is not what Yahuah is saying to Adam. They have rephrased Yahuah's words changing the Bible. It is a lie.
There are problems with that interpretation. First of all the Bible does say Adam would die in "the day" he ate from the tree."  
Genesis 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

But it is only in Jubilees that we read an interpretation about dying in the day you eat from the tree.  Any story that comes from Jubilees is apocryphal nonsense that is rightfully ignored. That book is not and never will be scripture.  But even so Jubilees says this:

4:29 And at the close of the nineteenth jubilee, in the seventh week in the sixth year thereof, Adam died, and all his sons buried him in the land of his creation, and he was the first to be buried in the earth. 

30  And he lacked seventy years of one thousand years; for one thousand years are as one day in the testimony of the heavens and therefore was it written concerning the tree of knowledge: 'On the day that ye eat thereof ye shall die.' For this reason he did not complete the years of this day; for he died during it.

Are we really supposed to believe that when God said you will die the day you eat from the tree he really meant you will die within a thousand years? What kind of threat or punishment is that? How does it apply to the rest of humanity who fell in Adam and are subject to the same penalty? The punishment happened then and there. Adam died. He became spiritually dead and separated from communion with God and so are we.

Secondly, the Bible says we are all spiritually dead in numerous passages. I will only list a few.
John 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

Ephesians 2:1 And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;

Ephesians 2:5 Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)

Colossians 2:13 And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;

Titus 3:5 Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost;

Obviously our soul is not dead as in lifeless. We are alive. But as the Bible says, we are dead in our sins while we live until Jesus Christ quickens us by the Holy Spirit. What exactly about us is dead? What did Jesus mean when he said let the dead bury their dead?

Matthew 8:22 But Jesus said unto him, Follow me; and let the dead bury their dead.

How can someone dead do anything? Because Jesus means they are spiritually dead and are walking after the things of this world rather than seeking first the kingdom of God and His righteousness. The spirt and mind are not the same as the soul. Tim says the soul is the life force. Everyone has a soul, a life force. 

If the soul is our life force and there is no unique spirit or mind then all men would be the same. A force is not personal. A force is an impersonal power like combustion which powers an engine which makes a car go. Not all cars and engines are the same. But combustion is a principle which never changes. In the case of humanity the life is in the blood.

Leviticus 17:11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.
The word translated life is the Hebrew word nepes which is translated elsewhere as soul. Obviously our blood is not our soul. But there is power in our blood which gives us life. There is a life force inside us that makes our heart beat, that powers our autonomic nervous system. Is the force that regulates our body the same as our mind, will, and emotions. Obviously not! Yet in Tim's system it would have to be because man is only body and soul.

What makes each man different is his unique spirit or mind or heart. It is clear that spirit, soul, mind, and heart are not the same thing which is why there are different words for them. In fact the Bible tells us that we were once dead in our sins and fulfilling the lusts of the body and the mind.

Ephesians 2:3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.

The word in this verse translated mind is dianoia and not psyche which shows they are not the same thing. It's a shame that Tim did not discuss the meaning of dianoia and only focused on psyche. But it is only a Youtube video after all.  Maybe he will write a book on the subject?

Another word Tim did not discuss in his video is the Hebrew word translated heart or mind.

https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h3820/kjv/wlc/0-1/

This word, leb, translates as heart, mind, or understanding as in the following verses:
Genesis 6:5 And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.

Exodus 7:14 And the LORD said unto Moses, Pharaoh's heart is hardened, he refuseth to let the people go.

Jeremiah 17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
Proverbs 4:23 Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life.
From the context we can see that heart does not mean breath of life or nepes which is the only Hebrew word Tim analyzes. Going through the usage it is painfully obvious that nepes is not at all the same as leb. Leb always means something immaterial. Nepes can mean the immaterial soul but it can also mean the entire person.
Genesis 14:21 And the king of Sodom said unto Abram, Give me the persons, and take the goods to thyself.

Exodus 16:16 This is the thing which the LORD hath commanded, Gather of it every man according to his eating, an omer for every man, according to the number of your persons; take ye every man for them which are in his tents.
The fact is Timothy Jay Schwab has not proven a single thing except that the words psyche and nepes can mean many things. But so what? Looking at the context of how these words are used shows that man does have a spirt as well as a soul and a body. The soul is what gives us life and the spirit is who we are. It is what makes us unique. It is our mind and heart. It is a lot of things. Can one harden the soul? Is the life force of man deceitful as Jeremiah says? No. That is the spirit. 

Tim's analysis of these two Greek and Hebrew words for soul is very poor. It's as bad as the first two videos where, instead of giving any context, he simply points to the word sleep and says, "See? It plainly says we go to sleep when we die." 

The second way to show Timothy Jay Schwab is completely wrong in denying that man has a spirit which is distinct from a soul is to look at the nature of Jesus Christ or Christology.

To really understand man we must first understand that we are created in the image of God and that God, in the Person of Jesus Christ who is the Son, took on human flesh. Properly understanding the incarnation is essential to understanding ourselves. Jesus, the divine Second Person of the Trinity, united Himself to human flesh, and had a human soul and a human mind. 

We must understand that while Christ is not a human Person but a Divine Person, that does not mean it is the divinity that empowers the body without a soul. That is akin to the heresy known as Apollinarianism which denies that Jesus had a rational human mind.

A Christological theory, according to which Christ had a human body and a human sensitive soul, but no human rational mind, the Divine Logos taking the place of this last.

https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01615b.htm

According to Apollinaris Jesus had a body and soul but the Person of Christ, the Logos, took the place of the rational mind. 

Looking at this from the dichotomy that is Tim's perspective means that Apollinaris would have taught that Jesus did not have a human soul. Instead he would have taught the Jesus had a human body but the soul, the life force, was the Logos. Kind of like God using a body as a puppet. In both schemes Jesus would not have been fully human. Every man has a soul. Every man has a rational mind or spirit. The mind is not the soul.

The Church teaches in no uncertain terms that Jesus Christ was fully man without sin. That means he had a body, soul, and mind. This is a principle taught by Gregory of Nazianzus.

If anyone has put his trust in Him as a Man without a human mind, he is really bereft of mind, and quite unworthy of salvation. For that which He has not assumed He has not healed; but that which is united to His Godhead is also saved. If only half Adam fell, then that which Christ assumes and saves may be half also; but if the whole of his nature fell, it must be united to the whole nature of Him that was begotten, and so be saved as a whole. Let them not, then, begrudge us our complete salvation, or clothe the Saviour only with bones and nerves and the portraiture of humanity. 

https://earlychurchtexts.com/public/gregoryofnaz_critique_of_apolliniarianism.htm

Now, I know Tim won't give a fig for what the "Synagogue of Satan" has to say unless it aids his deficient worldview but Christology is very important. It is not enough to say Jesus is God. Many heretics have said the same thing. The church spent 700 years formulating its Christology against those heretics. Jesus Christ is the Logos who became man. He united Himself to a human body, soul, and mind or spirit all while retaining his divine nature and personhood. Jesus is not a human person he is a divine person with a human nature and a divine nature. This is why we can say Mary is the mother of God and God died on the cross.

This was just a brief analysis and rebuttal of Tim's doctrine of the soul and spirit. As we have seen Tim's discussion of the issue is as shallow as ever. He only discussed TWO WORDS in the whole Bible which can be translated a number of ways. He did not bother to discuss all the other words which can be translated mind, spirit, or heart or analyze the contexts in which they are used. If he did he would have to come to the conclusion that man is a tripartite being made of body, soul, and spirit/mind. Did the Pharaoh harden his soul? Of course not.

Tuesday, February 22, 2022

The God Culture: Dismissed: Where Do We Go When We Die? Part 2

In the previous article in this series critiquing Timothy Jay Schwab's doctrine of the afterlife I looked at the meaning of the Greek word translated sleep and death. We saw that the word means literal sleep or metaphorical death depending on the context. There are also two other words, one which means sleep and only sleep and one which means death and only death with no metaphorical meaning for either. His challenge to show that sleep does not mean literal sleep was well met and I showed how disingenuous Tim is in his usage of those words.  I also looked at the chambers mentioned in Enoch. Tim says there are three but Enoch says there are four. The spirits in the fourth chamber will never leave that place. 

In this article I will briefly analyze and dismiss a few of Tim's videos in this series which have either no pertinent arguments in them for the subject at hand or no arguments at all. Let's start this review off by dismissing video 5 in this series.

Did A Witch Raise The Prophet Samuel From The Dead? Where Do We Go? Part 5 Answers In 2nd Esdras 23E

Did a witch raise the prophet Samuel from the dead? Tim says no she brought up a demon. The point of this video is to reinforce Tim's teaching that the dead are asleep in chambers in the earth and no one can bring them up except God. Therefore, she brought up a demon. This video is done away with in two precise slices. First of all the context of the entire story does not warrant us to believe anything except that Samuel was indeed brought up from the dead and not an impostor demon. How? You might as well explain how Balaam's Ass spoke or how Jesus made the blind see using spit and dirt. The how does not concern us here. It is the what that matters and she clearly brought up Samuel from the dead.

The fact that King Saul thought Samuel could be brought up from the dead shows with certainty that the Israelites did not have a conception of death as being a state of unconscious and inactive sleep. Rather it shows that they thought the spirits of dead men were aware and active in the afterlife. Thus this narrative contradicts Enoch's stories of the four chambers for the dead and Tim's whole scheme that the dead are asleep and inactive in one of those chambers. It is one more clue among many that Enoch was not written by the Patriarch Enoch before the flood but by someone in the Second Temple period of the 2nd century.

Second of all the Book of Sirach or Ecclesiasticus says Samuel prophesied after his death. Tim believes that Sirach is scripture.

Did the Book of Sirach Find the Rivers From Eden?

4:23 It was the temple priests they exiled to Qumran who kept scripture and guess what? They kept Sirach as scripture as well and it was found there. It was canon from the only group qualified and ordained to say so.

If Sirach is scripture then that means Sirach 46:13-20 is scripture.
13 Samuel, the prophet of the Lord, beloved of his Lord, established a kingdom, and anointed princes over his people.

14 By the law of the Lord he judged the congregation, and the Lord had respect unto Jacob.

15 By his faithfulness he was found a true prophet, and by his word he was known to be faithful in vision.

16 He called upon the mighty Lord, when his enemies pressed upon him on every side, when he offered the sucking lamb.

17 And the Lord thundered from heaven, and with a great noise made his voice to be heard.

18 And he destroyed the rulers of the Tyrians, and all the princes of the Philistines.

19 And before his long sleep he made protestations in the sight of the Lord and his anointed, I have not taken any man's goods, so much as a shoe: and no man did accuse him.

20 And after his death he prophesied, and shewed the king his end, and lifted up his voice from the earth in prophecy, to blot out the wickedness of the people.

How did Samuel prophesy after he was dead? That is clearly a reference to the witch of Endor calling him up. This passage decisively destroys video 5. This passage is either Scripture or it is not. Even if Tim does as usual and claim this passage is corrupt that does not solve the problem at all. That would be an unprovable ad hoc fallacy.

Video 7 is easily disposed of as well.

Is There a Difference Between Soul & Spirit? Where Do We Go? Part 7 Answers In 2nd Esdras 23G


This video is a continuation of part 6 where Tim discusses the difference between the soul and the spirit. This video is supposed to tell us why so many in the Church believe man is a tripartite being made of body, soul, and spirit. It is effectively a sustained tirade against the Trinity. 

2:37 But why the obsession with the number three in theology in this day and age? I mean they teach us there is a Trinity you know, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. Well that is a term never found in the Bible. It's just not there. Uh, don't care what you think whether Trinity or not Trinity there is no word Trinity in the Bible, period. It's just not there. 

Um, the Bible also does not ever equate the Holy Spirit as the other two. It's just not there either. Important, no doubt, and understanding their roles all three is what's really important not polarizing ridiculously stupid arguments. "Oh you're this, oh you're that label, oh you're that label," you go label whatever you want. Go do it in the corner, um, because that's where we put dunces on this channel. They will not be commenting. If you watch 22 Kinds of Creation we cover this psalm as creation in scripture was that of two not three. The Holy Spirit was there but we are given no role for Him and no equation to the other two. It's just not there. There are two creators Elohim a plural word meaning heavenly being and before the angels were created there were only two Elohim and that was the Father and the Son who did the creating.

Does Tim not understand that the way he talks he comes off as a polytheistic when he says that there are two gods, Father and Son? But then he will say that the Father and Son are equated which is modalist language. Yet Tim teaches they are separate. This is why a correct doctrine of who the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are is vital and important. God is three persons sharing one essence or nature. Anything less and you are going to go off into serious error and have a total misunderstanding of who God is and the function of each person.

Saying that the word Trinity is not in the Bible is a garbage argument against the Trinity. It is no argument at all. Tim also says that there is no universe because the word is not found in the Bible. 

30:30  Now the word universe is not even actually a Bible word or concept. Think about that. Yahuah is never referred to in scripture as the Lord of the universe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-H4dBijkqfM
Tim makes no coherent arguments against the Trinity and rails on and on about Pythagoras. It's like he is totally unaware of the vast body of writings from throughout Church history concerning the Trinity. He simply does not want deal with Hilary, Augustine, Tertullian, or the Cappadocians who all wrote extensively about the Trinity. Hint: THEY SAID NOTHING ABOUT PYTHAGORAS OR THE OCCULT! 

Tim literally says "they" teach these things because they want to open up their third eye. 

20:52 What we are seeing is the infusion of new age doctrine into these church doctrines. It is the new age community that separates the spirit from the soul. Again, we call that demon possession. They teach the mind is as powerful as the spirit or even more so as you can develop a third eye, even, where your soul can have the power, you know of a seer or whatever. like you know Josephus and the Pharisees in fact. Yeah, that is similar because Kabbalah, all the same. Like the Greek philosophers. Don't let your church inject new age garbage because that's what they're doing with this word soul.

This follows from a long section where Tim explains Hebrews 4:12 by saying the joints and marrow are the same thing.

16:14 This is firmly figurative language there's no doubting that. I mean it comes out and tells you that it is not intended to express a reality. But you don't walk around without your both joints and marrow do you? Uh, you won't be if you don't have them. In the function of joints and marrow ,uh, we're looking at bones here, okay? Joints are joining bones together and marrow runs through the bone so you need both. In other words the two are one in terms of bone. They function together. Without either good luck using your bones you will not.

However, the point of this scripture is to pinpoint things which are not truly separate and cannot be separated, really. I mean that's the point. You will not use your bones without both joints and marrow. You need both. You will not live eternally without your soul and spirit yet you do not need your current body do you? No you don't. We won't, that returns to dust. We receive new bodies but not a new soul and not a new spirit which are the same thing. They have to be.

Joints and marrow are NOT the same thing. They function together but they are NOT the same thing. They are able to be totally and really separated. Can your car run without gas? Of course not!  That does not make your gas and car the same thing. Someone left a rather insightful comment concerning this but Tim deleted it.

I usually like your videos however trying to say the inside of the bone is the same as the joint on the outside of the bone connecting other bones. One provides movement and one provides structure. They are not the same, but are part of the same system. The spirit binds the soul to the body, the spirit is the breath of life. We do not raincarnated, we die and go to Sheol and the spirit returns to the maker. John the Baptist had the spirit of Elijah, so if the soul is the  spirit then John the Baptist wasnt a new person, he would have been a reincarnated Elijah.

No, the spirit is not the same as the soul. John the Baptist had the soul of John the Baptist, but the spirit that brought life to Elijah also was imparted on John the Baptist to bring his body to life.

It's complete nonsense and since Tim cannot bring himself to deal with actual arguments for the Trinity it is proper to dismiss this video entirely and focus instead on video 6 and Tim's discussion of the soul and spirit. 


Maybe one day he will make a video where he actually does deal with arguments for the Trinity rather than setting up straw men. Literally no Christian believes in the Trinity because of occult numerology. Such nonsense betrays a total ignorance of Christian theology and history. 


If Tim really cared to understand the Trinity he would read the Cappadocians and their treatises against the Arians and the Eunomians because it is their views of the Trinity which were adopted as dogma at the 2nd Council of Nicea. Not long after the Western Church inserted the Filioque into the confession. Historically this is what led to the schism between the church East and West. I am quite sure Tim knows nothing of any of that history because he sure does not understand even the basics of Trinitarian doctrine especially as it relates to the Person of Christ and the Holy Spirit.


Likewise video 8 can also be scrapped for the same reasons. Video 8 is Tim's answer as to why the Church does not believe in soul sleep as he does. It's all because the Church incorporated the Egyptian Book of the Dead into their doctrines.


Egyptian Book of the Dead. Origin of Church Doctrine on Judgment? Part 8 Answers In 2nd Esdras 23H

13:25 But let's go to the source, their source, the Egyptian Book of the Dead to see what it says. Let's be clear because some get easily confused or so they wish to be in ignorance at times in order to make accusation of course. Uh, you know we teach the Bible and this is the opposite but we cover this because most churches today are teaching this doctrine right out of the Egyptian Book of the Dead and not from the Bible. They're missing it completely. So, for anyone wishing to show disgust by all means we certainly will. But how about you make sure you get our position right and realize that position is not the opposite because we get accused every time we do a video like this in that manner.

15:10 There are several ways you can read this Egyptian Book of the Dead. One is by E.A. Wallis Budge. Uh, he has put out a lot of different occult writings, indeed, uh he just loves them. But we're going to stick to a paraphrase for the sake of time since this is a YouTube video. Accounts differ in some and we're not going to cover "well this one says, but this one says, but this one says" who cares? Generally they are in agreement and all serve as the origin of this church doctrine. That's our point. Uh, which certainly does not come from the Bible and that's what we're getting at. We're going to use worldhistory.com, The Egyptian Afterlife

There are a number of problems in these two excerpts from this video. First of all Tim says those who criticize him need to get his position right. That is laughable because this entire video is him getting the position of the Catholic Church wrong!  In fact he does not once cite any official Catholic doctrine. Instead he cites from an internet article ABOUT the Egyptian Book of the Dead rather than FROM the Egyptian Book of the Dead. That means he is not even familiar with the book from which he claims the Church gets its doctrine of the afterlife. 

Tell us Tim, how the heck would the contents of this book somehow slip into the Church's teaching? He NEVER TELLS US!! He just makes accusation after unsubstantiated accusation. Does he not know that the Egyptian book of the Dead was WRITTEN IN HIEROGLYPHICS!! Nobody knew how to read Egyptian until the discovery of the Rosetta Stone in 1799! So, there is no way possible this unreadable text could have been read by any Christian and incorporated into Christian doctrine. Is Tim really that much of a moron or does he think his audience is too stupid to understand that?

The existence of the Book of the Dead was known as early as the Middle Ages, well before its contents could be understood. Since it was found in tombs, it was evidently a document of a religious nature, and this led to the widespread but mistaken belief that the Book of the Dead was the equivalent of a Bible or Qur'an

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_the_Dead

Everything in this video is just so blatantly false there is no proper way to deal with it except to throw it in the garbage. How can this man claim to have gone to seminary and been a minister for over 30 years and not know why Christians believe the things they do? This nonsense about the occult creeping into the Church and influencing her doctrines in any way is provably false if one would take the time to read the writings of the Church Fathers and especially the dogmatic definitions of the ecumenical councils. I have done this and I cannot pour years of study into one article. It is not possible. Tim needs to take his head out of the Dead Sea Scrolls and actually learn Christian doctrine. There is 2000 years of it.

The reason the Church believes that after death one is conscious and experiences either torments or joys is because the Bible teaches that. Listen to what Paul says to the Philippians.

Philippians 1:21 For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain.

22 But if I live in the flesh, this is the fruit of my labour: yet what I shall choose I wot not.

23 For I am in a strait betwixt two, having a desire to depart, and to be with Christ; which is far better:

24 Nevertheless to abide in the flesh is more needful for you.

It's notable that Tim does not deal with these verses at all. Paul says he desires to depart this life and be with Christ. What sense does it make, what hope is there, if what Paul really means is that he desires to die and fall asleep in a subterranean chamber somewhere below the Philippines? How is falling asleep and being unconscious far better than being alive and aware? How is to die and fall into an unconscious sleep gain?

43:19 We also locate the Garden of Eden in the Philippines, uh, below in the earth not up here on the surface.

1:21:34 Then there is the Garden of Eden that houses Yahuah's Holy of Holies on earth. Of course we didn't cover all of the many scriptures in the Garden of Eden there are tons but you know those. Um, but yes that is inside the earth the Hebrew word again is an enclosed garden. It's always been inside the earth and it never moved nor did the tree of life that's called kabbalah that's not bible. The bible says it's still there and that we'll have access to it on the after the day of judgment basically. And why Paul says when we die we are absent the body but in his presence. Why? How could that be? Well, because the chamber for the righteous is obviously next to the Garden of Eden. And what's in the Garden of Eden? The Holy of Holies of Yahuah on earth. Ha! Still in His presence. Exactly!

What Is Hell? Is It Real? Part 9 Answers In 2nd Esdras 23I



It's stupid beyond belief. Tim's doctrine of the afterlife offers NO HOPE to anyone. Sure, we will wake up after so many years to the final judgement and be with Jesus forever but so what? The hope we have is not that we will fall asleep at death for thousands or hundred of years but that, as Paul says, when we depart this life we shall be received into the very presence of Jesus Christ and live with him forever. It's as if Tim does not realize the great promise of the Gospel which is to be united to Jesus Christ (Col 1:27; 1 Cor 3:16, 6:17, 19; 2 Peter 1:4; John 14:23, 17:22; Gal 2:19). Jesus Himself prays that the saints will be with Him in Heaven to behold his glory.

John 17:24 Father, I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be with me where I am; that they may behold my glory, which thou hast given me: for thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world.

Truly to die is to gain eternity with Jesus Christ to whom we are united, not to sleep in some underground chamber next to the Philippines.

Friday, February 18, 2022

The God Culture: The Philippines is Surrounded by Sleeping Ghosts: Where Do We Go When We Die? Part 1

Timothy Jay Schwab of The God Culture has released another magnum opus in the form of a ten part video series titled "Where do we go when we die?" All these years the Church has gotten the afterlife wrong. Rather than teach what the Bible teaches they have been teaching the doctrines of occult mystery religions. The Egyptian Book of the Dead essentially. But not only does Timothy definitively reveal to us the truth about the afterlife, he also clears up the truth about the nature of the soul and spirit or lack thereof.

So, where do we go when we die?

Where Do We Go When We Die? Part 1. Answers In 2nd Esdras 23A

To understand that we must first understand what happens to our body and spirit when we die.

8:24 Our bodies are dead but spirits are asleep.

Tim will repeat that phrase ad nauseam throughout the series. He has taken great pains to point out almost every single verse that equates death with sleep and he has concluded that when we die our soul, which is the same as our spirit as we shall see, falls asleep. But what does this mean? Tim tells us in the 2nd video.


Lazarus Come Forth... Where Do We Go When We Die? Part 2. Answers In 2nd Esdras 23B

5:24 Sleep, well it is sleep just as we understand it but for the spirit in this case. Death is death just as we understand it, physical death. Very clear, not hard. Dead is dead. These are all good translations with each variant of the use here. It’s pretty clear so how could this get so misunderstood as to say Well, Lazarus, as Carmen says in his song, was in Heaven?

How could it get misunderstood? Does he mean how can we understand sleep to be a metaphor for death? Well, for one thing that's what the Greek definition he is showing onscreen actually says!

https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/g2837/kjv/tr/0-1/


Now, in the New Testament there are 19 instances of the word sleep. All of them except for John 11:13 use this word, G2837, for sleep. John 11:13 uses Strong's number G2838 which means sleeping or rest without any metaphorical meaning.

https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/g2838/kjv/tr/0-1/

This is a very important distinction. The context of John 11 looks like this:
John 11:11 These things said he: and after that he saith unto them, Our friend Lazarus sleepeth; but I go, that I may awake him out of sleep. (G2837)

12 Then said his disciples, Lord, if he sleep (G2837), he shall do well.
13 Howbeit Jesus spake of his death: but they thought that he had spoken of taking of rest in sleep (G2838).

14 Then said Jesus unto them plainly, Lazarus is dead (G599).

There is a back and forth here. Jesus says Lazarus is asleep and the disciples say if he is asleep then he shall do well. Both words for sleep being used are Strong's G2837 which can mean either literal sleeping or metaphorical death. We plainly know that Lazarus is dead but Jesus says he is asleep and he does not use a word that means sleep and only sleep but one which can also metaphorically mean death. The writer notes that the disciples thought Jesus meant sleep and he uses G2838 which is a word that always means sleep literally. Then, Jesus says plainly, Lazarus is dead and he uses Strong's G599 which only means dead because that is what he meant all along, Lazarus is dead. Thus, Jesus is saying Lazarus is actually dead and only metaphorically asleep. His soul is not off in some chamber asleep awaiting the resurrection. There will be more to say about this parable in a future article because Tim's interpretation is quite a doozy.

So, a lot of nuance is missed here. Just like in John 21, when it is translated into English, the nuances of the word love disappear. It is not odd at all that Timothy did not mention that G2837 can mean either literal sleep or metaphorical death because he is prone to smooth over facts that do not fit his paradigm. In video 3 he challenges his listeners:

26:35 Want to say, well, maybe sleep doesn't mean sleep? Well, we showed you the word in the Greek and it means sleep. So, yeah, that would be the best hope for someone to try to then say that. So, you cannot redefine it nor this passage. Again, we didn't just show a couple of fragments here. This case is massive and you have to watch those two videos for all the scripture we're not going to recover it all.  

Lazarus & the Rich Man. Where Do We Go When We Die? Part 3. Answers In 2nd Esdras 23C

It's so disingenuous because G2837 is used 18 times in the New Testament. Some of those usages plainly mean literal sleep:

Acts 12:6 And when Herod would have brought him forth, the same night Peter was sleeping between two soldiers, bound with two chains: and the keepers before the door kept the prison.



But in other places that usage clearly means literal death. 


“The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord.” 
The word translated dead is also translated sleep 5 TIMES elsewhere in this same letter.



So, challenge accepted and met. The New Testament usage of this word varies from literal sleep to metaphorical death or even literal death as in the case of 1 Corinthians 7:39. Just within one letter there are various usages of this word to mean either a metaphorical sleep or a literal death.

But what about the Old Testament? Let's look at Psalm 13:3 which Tim cites in video 2

47:50 Psalm 13:3.  Consider and hear me O Lord my God. Lighten my eyes lest I sleep the sleep of death. Yeah David knew. Physical death is sleep for the spirit

This is wrong. In the English translation "the sleep of" is in italics which means it is not in the original Hebrew but supplied to give it meaning. The first sleep is Strong's H3462 which means sleep and the second word is H4194 which means death, to be dead. That means in this verse death is being likened to sleep. And that is how we should interpret Daniel 12:2 which Tim loves to quote.
And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.
The word sleep there is H3463 which means sleeping. But given the context, a book of highly complex and figurative prophecy, it is undoubtedly metaphorical. 

So, where do we go when we die? As has been established Tim, erroneously, thinks our spirits go to sleep. But where exactly do they go to sleep? Well that depends on your state at the moment of death. Tim teaches, according to Enoch, that deep within the earth there are three chambers for the dead. One for the wicked, one for the righteous, and one for martyrs.
41:50 He places them in His chambers. That's where He set aside space for such in 3 categories we know from Enoch. They are not evil, yes there is one for sinners, but the chamber is not evil. It's not hell. Within the earth. Enoch said that there are 3. 1 for righteous, 1 for sinners, and 1 for martyrs who still cry out and He hears them. 
The chamber specifically for martyrs is rather interesting and unique to Tim's conception of the afterlife. It's certainly not a concept in the Bible because Enoch is not Bible. In fact Revelation tells us that in Heaven the martyrs are under the altar.
Revelation 6:9 And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held:

10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?

11 And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.
How can there be martyrs in heaven if, as Tim says, the souls of the martyred go to a specific chamber in the earth where they both sleep and cry out?
44:13 Then we have the sleep chamber for those who were martyred and yes they still cry out in their sleep but they're still asleep nonetheless. That's what the bible says. And they make accusation of those who murdered them just as Abel's blood cried out. Right? I mean that's pretty much, that was established since Abel at least and that's the way Yahuah set it up and that's the way he wants it and i'll get that. So, no it does not make them conscious nor awake

Pick one please. Are they crying out or are they asleep? It can't be both. This picture of sleeping souls tossing and turning and shouting out loud is ridiculous and certainly not the picture that Enoch paints. which is that all the souls are awake and conscious with the wicked especially being "set apart in this great pain."
Enoch 22: 10. And such has been made for sinners when they die and are buried in the earth and judgement has not been executed on them in their lifetime. 

11. Here their spirits shall be set apart in this great pain till the great day of judgement and punishment and torment of those who †curse† for ever, and retribution for their spirits. There He shall bind them for ever. 
How would they be in great pain unless they were awake and conscious?

Tim's solution as to why there are martyrs in heaven is, as usual, ad hoc. He makes it up as he goes.
59:39 No one can enter Heaven without being judged. Now, the exception is the very end when we find the 144,000 and the innumerable multitude both in Heaven. Time is short then and Yahuah chooses, that's His choice and He says He does it, to accept the first offering of the man child, Revelation 12, the 144,000 from Israel, 12,000 from each of the 12 tribes, that's what they are, they're Israelites and He takes the Tribulation Martyrs or Saints to Heaven at that time for a short time at the end. But that has not happened previously nor is it happening yet and does not except for those 2 groups.

Maybe this is because, hold on to your seat, there are so many martyrs, they would fill that chamber of martyrs within the Earth or, and we don't know that, or maybe, it is because He wishes to hear their cries right there in His throne room along with the rest of Heaven who will also hear them crying out for justice.

According to Tim this all happens at the very end of time and perhaps there are so many martyrs then that the chamber is full. Now, that is a funny thing for Tim to say because he does not believe there will be a large remnant of believers. He is constantly telling his audience that the Church is the Synagogue of Satan and that the number of true believers is not in the billions or millions but a tiny remnant.

You will never find denominations in scripture. His ekklesia cannot be broken into such. In our age, there are a Remnant of believers only. It is not 1.5 billion but a few in terms of the population of the world. They are one and defined as keeping His commandments. Those come from the Bible as should all of our doctrine.

It's not a big shock that Tim is inconsistent in his statements here as this is how he always is.

But all of this stuff about three chambers is just wrong. First of all 1 Enoch 22:1 says:
And from there, I went to another place, and he showed me in the west a large and high mountain, and a hard rock, and four beautiful places.
Enoch is shown a mountain in the west and inside this mountain four places. That is not a location deep within the earth. That is more akin to caverns on a mountain. He is shown four, not three, places. The fourth place is described in verse 13 which Tim conveniently forgot to cite.
Thus a place has been created, for the souls of men who are not righteous, but sinners, accomplished in wrongdoing, and with the wrongdoers will be their lot. But their souls will not be killed on the day of judgment, nor will they rise from here.
It's no surprise Tim neglects this verse because it does not fit his teaching which is that all men will be resurrected, the wicked will undergo the second death which is complete annihilation, and the righteous will live forever. This verse clearly says the souls of these wicked men will not be destroyed and they will not be leaving this chamber. 

But hold on a minute. Isn't to die to be in the presence of the Lord? Didn't Stephen say, "Lord receive my spirit?" How is this possible if the spirits of dead righteous men are going to an unconscious sleep in a chamber deep within the bowels of the earth?
11:35 Now you're going to see where some of our research comes together and why we went so deep into finding locating the Garden of Eden and why it matters so, so much to restore this. Basically in the chambers within the earth you, basically in location, are next to the Garden of Eden which is, what? Where the Holy of Holies the permanent one, not the temporary one in Israel but the permanent Holy of Holies of Yahuah is in the Garden of Eden

22:09 Check out Solomon's Gold Series, Answers in Jubilees and we, well prove out, even map out by Noah's directions, uh, the route to, uh, the Garden of Eden it's in the Philippines, under the Philippines, within the earth. It's not up here.  
According to Tim The Garden of Eden is underneath the floor of the Sulu Sea. Underneath Tubbataha Reef in fact. And next to this enclosed Holy of Holies where God's presence on earth is lies the chamber for the souls of the righteous dead.  Maybe it looks like this:


That means when Stephen said, "Lord Jesus receive my spirit."  He meant receive me in the chamber hidden within the earth next to the Garden of Eden.

10:52 The is the same as when we understand the paradigm when Stephen, the disciple, when he was stoned to death he says "Yahusha Messiah receive my spirit." Wait. Yahusha did not receive his spirit in heaven? What? No, of course not. He received him into the chambers because they're his. He created them.

Answering Challenges. Where Do We Go When We Die? Part 4. Answers In 2nd Esdras 23D

Jesus received Stephen into the chambers? Really? A closer look at the story paints a whole other picture.

Acts 7:55 But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up stedfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God,

56 And said, Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God.

57 Then they cried out with a loud voice, and stopped their ears, and ran upon him with one accord,

58 And cast him out of the city, and stoned him: and the witnesses laid down their clothes at a young man's feet, whose name was Saul.

59 And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.
So, let me get this straight. Stephen, after giving an impassioned speech before an unruly mob, looks up to Heaven and sees Jesus standing at the right hand of the Father and he says, "Lord Jesus, receive my spirit."  And we are supposed to believe that Jesus is going to receive him not in Heaven where he is and where Stephen saw Him, but in the chambers of the earth somewhere near the Philippines which is also where the Garden of Eden is located and where Stephen would be asleep and thus unconscious of any such reception!!?

This is too much. It is utterly ridiculous. But let us press on. Tim teaches when we die our spirits are laid to sleep in one of three chambers which are enclosed within the earth. His scheme looks like this:

What Is Hell? Is It Real? Part 9 Answers In 2nd Esdras 23I

At the end of time on the day of judgement all the souls in each chamber will be resurrected. Not only that but because all men die that means Enoch and Elijah, who are the only men who never died, will endure a quick death and resurrection along with everyone else who is alive at the second coming.

18:43 "And we shall be changed." Now, those still alive will still be changed and yes, even Enoch and   Elijah. This is the explanation for all die. All men will die, it's appointed for all men to die, right? See, they didn't die yet however they will but they'll experience a very quick physical death and resurrection receiving their new bodies and they will be changed. They must be, they have to be.

"For this corruptable must put on incorruption." This corruptible body your body is corrupt  and born into sin essentially thanks to Adam. So it's corruptible. We must put on a new body that is incorruption. Again, even Enoch. So all men will die, period, even those alive in the end. Which is the same boat as Enoch because they'll still be alive in the end. hat's not a mystery and it's no surprise the Bible deals with that. 

Actually the Bible teaches that those who are alive at Christ's second coming will not die but will be changed.

1 Corinthians 15:51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,

52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.

Tim's interpretation of this verse is that the changing that happens is a quick death and resurrection. But the scripture does not say that. It says we shall not sleep, die, but we shall be changed and given new immortal bodies. Tim's false interpretation takes that miracle and basically throws it in the trash. Now there is no miracle of bodily transformation but only the rather drab prospect of a quick death and resurrection. 

At the resurrection all will be judged. The wicked will be eternally burned up and nothing will be left of them. While the righteous will inherit eternal life and will never die.

19:50 "And this mortal must put on immortality." So, the body you have now is mortal. It can't live forever, it doesn't live forever, we see that. It has an expiration date. Your new one will not if you are a believer. If you are not a believer, well, doesn't matter  because those will be consumed with eternal fire but you're probably not listening to this anyway. Uh, and they will never be seen again even in spirit, just ashes that's all that will  be left 

This is the heresy known as annihilationism. That the wicked will be utterly consumed and that there is no eternal punishment in the lake of fire.

26:46 Rev. 21:8 tells us “But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone:which is the second death.”  There you go. But again, many think in the Church basically characterizes this in an occult way. That this is hell which people enter and they live there forever in eternal torment. That's not scripture. Again, the 1st death for them was physical. The 2nd will be spiritual and eternal. Forever. Done.  All that will be left of them and Ezra says this, we cover this on there videos, Ezra says they'll just be ashes. That's all that will be left.

This is all wrong. The very verse he cites tells us that the wicked shall be cast into the lake of fire and there are many scriptures which tell us this is an eternal burning that will last forever. It's really amazing how ignorant Timothy Jay Schwab is of the scriptures.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlFizsC_0E8&lc=UgzJibbi3WvKd8vRx4Z4AaABAg

Mark Murray: Why does Jesus say their worm dies not

The God Culture: What are you talking about. If you would like to share a scripture do so.

The God Culture: Ah... That scripture is after the Day of Judgment when as it is clear Heaven and earth are made new. Nothing to really discuss regarding this topic as that is exactly what we have said all along. We die physically, our spirits sleep awaiting judgment and that is exactly what happens on the Day of Judgment and not before. Yah Bless.

What a hilarious exchange. A guy named Mark asks Tim about the passage in Mark which says "their worm dieth not." Tim's reply indicates he has no idea that he is referencing the Gospel of Mark. But then a week later a lightbulb goes off in Tim's head while he's taking a shower or drinking 3-n-1 or who knows what and he finally understands what Mark meant. He then rushes to the computer to type up a total non-answer. Let's look at this passage in Mark 9.

43 And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched:

44 Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.

45 And if thy foot offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter halt into life, than having two feet to be cast into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched:

46 Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.

47 And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out: it is better for thee to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire:

48 Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.

The issue here, which Tim does not address at all in this comment or in his videos, is that if their worm dies not and if the fire is never quenched then that means the wicked are continually suffering and are not burned up into ashes. In fact Isaiah says the righteous shall look upon the wicked as they burn in hell.

66:24 And they shall go forth, and look upon the carcases of the men that have transgressed against me: for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched; and they shall be an abhorring unto all flesh

Tim's bizarre reasoning leads him to say that the fire is eternally burning because its effects are eternal not because it is actually burning forever.

22:29 The wicked are consumed period. And completely and final, the end that's why it's called eternal fire. Not because it burns and burns and burns forever but because when it burns it burns eternally. that's what it's about. So, don't misread passages that we are consumed by eternal fire as meaning we sit in a furnace when we die that's just not true that's not fact there's no bible verse that ever says that, ever. It's just not there. That assumes Yahusha's eternal fire is impotent, not effective, uh, because it it can only burn us but it it doesn't consume us. It's supposed to consume us that's what the Bible says it does so does it or doesn't it? Well, that ain't scripture. That's, that's the point.

48:45 In the end this will be opened and the wicked angels and men will be thrown into the lake of fire. When they are they are burned immediately to ashes, to nothing. Nothing remains. The fire is everlasting. Indeed, it's eternal. Its effect is everlasting and eternal and it cannot be undone. Their torture however is over in seconds once they are consumed as even their spirits are then gone forever.

To be more specific Tim teaches that this eternal fire will only burn for 5 days.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJhHkYky60Y&lc=UgyYC6LQov9cZGDKFJN4AaABAg

RUTHANN JOHNSON How long will it take for Earth and heaven to be remade

The God Culture Good question. It appears the Trumpet sounds on the Feast of Trumpets, Judgment Day is about 10 days later and 5 days later believers are receiving their new bodies according to the Feast schedule. One could say the battle occurs with Messiah and his army vs. the world essentially for 10 days roughly and then, He judges and replenishes with eternal fire for 5 days essentially. That's just a quick answer but in time, we hope to produce a video on that. Yah Bless.

But why call this an eternal fire if it's not actually eternally burning? What is the worm that dieth not and the fire that is quenched not if the fire is not actually burning forever and the wicked eternally suffering? It makes no sense and Tim has not dealt with this issue of Mark 9 or Isaiah 66.

What need is there to be afraid of He who can destroy both body and soul in hell if the end result is total annihilation? What sense is Jesus' warning if entering into hell with both hands leads not to eternal punishment but to eternal nothingness? What is there to fear if, rather than being punished in the fires of hell for all eternity, one will cease to exist? Even the Bible envies those who never existed.

Ecclesiastes 4:2 Wherefore I praised the dead which are already dead more than the living which are yet alive.

3 Yea, better is he than both they, which hath not yet been, who hath not seen the evil work that is done under the sun.

The fact is the Bible paints the fate of the wicked as eternal, everlasting, conscious torment. The flip side of that is the reward of eternal life for the righteous which is also everlasting and conscious. If there is no eternal punishment then it truly does not matter what one does in this life as every great sinner will face no consequences except to be freed from the burden of existence via total annihilation. 

I have already shown that Tim is a liar and that the Greek word translated sleep means metaphorical death, literal sleep, or literal death depending on the context. He is a liar because that definition is shown onscreen in his video and decided to skip right over it not mention that it can mean death metaphorically. But not only that he also denied this in the comment section of his video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlFizsC_0E8&lc=Ugx6A-phhGGINZkZMHZ4AaABAg

Nancy Kindt "Sleep" means sleep, yes. But it can be an IDIOM for death, as we sometimes refer to death by saying, "He sleeps with the fishes," or "He sleeps with the angels." Also, because there is no time in the spirit world (and a day is as a 1000 years), your argument about Abraham waiting for 1000's of years doesn't seem valid. Imo, the 1000's of NDE's, which are very consistent over time and cultures, indicates that we do have a form of consciousness and activity after we die.

The God Culture Your modern IDIOMs are impertinent and not scripture. You don't use those to define scripture do you? If that is your foundation you will miss much. You haven't actually made a point here because we teach what the Bible says and it defines sleep, even Messiah Himself does, as our spirits sleeping when our bodies die. If you have not watched the previous 2 videos, we cover tons of such scripture. These cannot be redefined by modern IDIOMs. Use the Bible to interpret the Bible. Yah Bless.

Her second reply is a fabulous rebuke to Timothy but I'm not going to reprint the whole thing here. She really takes him to task for this erroneous teaching of soul sleep.

I think this is a common but erroneous teaching in the Torah movement. According to so many verses, the "sleep" of death seem to be only a figure of speech and refers to the BODY sleeping, not the soul. "And the graves were opened; and many BODIES of the saints which slept arose (Matthew 27:52)." Here we see it's the BODIES which sleep, not the soul.

So, the BODY sleeps, but the soul does not, as evidenced again by Yahusha's parable of Lazarus. You need to ask yourself: Why would the Messiah describe a situation that doesn't accord with reality? Certainly, He wouldn't misrepresent the after life.

Tim had no follow up reply and its amazing he did not outright delete this comment.

I have also shown that 1 Enoch does not line up with Tim's teaching because there is a 4th chamber from which certain wicked souls shall never escape. But we are not done here. There are a few more articles to come. The next article will deal with several videos in this series that are just plain awful, contain very bad arguments or unproved assertions, and are easily dismissed.

The God Culture: ChatGPT Analyzes The Etymology Of Ophir

I have run Timothy Jay Schwab's books through ChatGPT several times with the same results. But what about my articles? Are they up to sn...