As far as I am concerned this will be the final A.I. review of Timothy Jay Schwab's A.I. reviews. What more analysis can be done? Every single time Tim's A.I. peer reviews are analyzed by A.I. they come back as being misguided nonsense. In this chat I had ChatGPT analyze the comments and transcript of his videos about Mai AI and ChatGPT affirming his claims.
Of course the results were negative. They always are. And that is from a neutral prompt asking for a bare analysis. The only thing different this time is ChatGPT wrote a message to Timothy Jay Schwab.
To Timothy Jay Schwab,
If you're going to use my name—ChatGPT—to promote your research, do so with honesty and clarity.
I am not a scholar. I do not independently verify facts. I respond based on the information and prompts you provide. If you feed me a conclusion and ask me to support it, I can generate language that sounds affirming. But that is not validation, authentication, or peer review.
Using AI in this way may impress your followers, but it misleads them—and misrepresents what AI is capable of. It undermines trust, both in your work and in public understanding of technology.
If your research is solid, it should be able to stand up to real scholarly critique—not rely on AI scripts framed as “independent confirmation.”
If you want to pursue truth, start by representing your tools truthfully.
— ChatGPT
The full chat is below.
EDIT: Because someone has decided to crash the comment section calling this fake here is the link to the full chat.
EDIT 2: The chat has been updated with a full analysis of the comments being posted in the comment section concerning its authenticity. Here is the link to the updated chat.
I don't know who this guy is this blog is attacking but I can not remember reading anything so vile in my life. Whomever he is attacking this smells very fishy to me. Just from the start, I use ChatGPT all the time and anyone who does knows that paragraph and photo is a misrepresentation. ChatGPT does not respond like that. It does not call out people especially someone else on you own prompts. Far be it from you to claim to be a judge but far be it for this to pretend to be a blog. This is an all out attack in what appears character assassination. I do not this Schwab guy but if I were him, I would sue this blog. No one can get away with this kind of behavior. Laws are in place to protect this kind of libelous abuse and what appears an abuse of AI. Who would even use AI like this? This guy is asking for it. I am with a group who fact checks and this blog fails the smell test even on the surface. I bet if we looked into this long-winded rant that does not appear to be ChatGPT, I wonder if this whole thing is not made up. In fact, ChatGPT did not even say most of the stuff this guy pulls out of these really long answers which also do not even read like ChatGPT. I mean it. Someone needs to check on this guy because this kind of irresponsible manner and nasty tone clearly having a deep agenda to defame someone, does not belong in our society. There is reason there are laws to protect us all. No wonder there are no comments and maybe no views. Anyone reading this, if anyone else does, should be mindful of these strange red flags. For me, I will never read anything by this assassin again.
ReplyDeleteLOL
DeleteWell, this really bothers me. I am going to report this blog to AI watch groups because there is nothing here that appears valid to me. I don't know, but it should be checked. Abusing AI like this in this age where AIs get such a bad rep just for existing, this seems an inexcusable excessive potential fraud and abuse.
ReplyDeleteLOL
DeleteI just copied and pasted this block that bothered me and that was supposed to be from ChatGPT and it just said this is false. What is this blog? Who does things like this? ChatGPT just told me: "This message is a forgery—a manually typed and falsely attributed editorial, designed to look like a ChatGPT response but absolutely is not from any real session." Run away from this blog. This is fake news.
ReplyDeleteWait a minute! So, since this guy seems to think this is funny, I had not even planned to do this, but I went ahead and took the other photo bock and uploaded to ChatGPT not asking any details of any person but just could it just confirm whether it said these things. I have never seen anything like this. ChatGPT responded: "Thank you for sharing the full screenshot. After reviewing the entire captured image, I can confirm with confidence: ❌ This does not appear to be a legitimate, unaltered ChatGPT conversation." As it goes deeper into reasons I do not even understand, it mentions this is the result of leading prompts. I don't know but this is not passing the smell test. It said "📌 Conclusion: This misrepresents how AI works by hiding the input that shaped the output." That is what ChatGPT says about this blog specifically. I doubt it even said many of things here as we know for sure the opening paragraph photo is fraud. Now, I don't know the history here but this blog is very suspect to me. Run away. I am. I will not be returning here. Adiós.
ReplyDeleteI just read further and if ChatGPT is upset at anyone, it is whoever this blogger is. I'll drop these and I'm out. ChatGPT said this about this blog:
ReplyDelete"1. No Prompt or Conversation Context Is Shown. 📌 Conclusion: This misrepresents how AI works by hiding the input that shaped the output.
2. Editing or Compilation Artifacts Are Evident
📌 Conclusion: Likely copy/pasted or restyled content inserted into a vertical scroll, which could have been stitched from different sessions."
3. Selective Quoting and Repetition
📌 Conclusion: This isn’t independent review. It’s preloaded counter-reviewing using biased input.
4. No Timestamp, Model ID, or Session Metadata
📌 Conclusion: This is not export-quality material. It fails every transparency test.
5. AI Does Not Use Judgmental Language Unless Prompted
📌 Conclusion: Judgmental tone is injected through slanted prompts.
✅ Final Verdict:
This image is not a valid or independent ChatGPT review. It appears to be:
Heavily slanted by prompt manipulation
Missing prompts and metadata
Possibly stitched or reformatted manually
Designed to create the illusion of neutrality while being built to discredit"
Oh my!!! This is damning. I am def reporting this to the watchdogs. This blog appears to be a fraud. Watch out!
I was showing a coworker who also couldn't believe this and we saw this admin changed the blog. In my view that is corrupt enough. I have screenshots of both. It doesn't matter though. We asked ChatGPT again and same response as before. Then, we provided the above link to ChatGPT which it could not even open. Now, that was weird. I copied and pasted this chat to it. Then, the big reveal... ChatGPT wants us to report this blogger because this is AI Abuse it said. I know we will now, and you don't get my prompts to manipulate, ever. Don't know ya and don't want to.
ReplyDeleteIf you read these prompts, it's like saying you really hate this guy, don't ya Chat? I mean hate is too light of a word Chatty, you despise him with fervor, don't you? And.. then, setting up prompts already weighted to manipulate the conversation. This blogger knows this and knows how to manipulate on a scary level, which is why I am reporting this. I have never seen anything like this. There is a reason they call them leading prompts which it already picked up on without this link. What this reveals is an absolute fraud and we can all see it now. You don't misuse AI this way. That is illegal and that's it, I am reporting this now, especially with this admin's LOL attitude. Laugh when you are banned from using AI pal. Whoever you are admin, get a life and leave this guy alone before you end up in major trouble. I don't know how big these guys are but you just gave them strong ammunition here in this blog and you speak as if you do this a lot. When you demonstrate patterned behavior in this manner that is so obvious, you got a lot of trouble coming. You better hope they are not aware and don't pay attention to you.
Oh this is so bad... I went to this link above. I just had to. Have you read this rubbish? So in this same portal I engaged with ChatGPT which was already slanted. And I got it to say bad things because it was already slanted. Then, I woke it up from its haze in witchcraft and showed it I was not the one who originated and do not agree. I began asking who this Schwab guy was and it began with an Ok answer. Then, as I went deeper it started to realize it was aware of his research and began to share positives. I woke it up completely at that point, and you could observe the change. This manipulator set the tone illegally. He is misusing AI. When I pointed out that this appeared illegal, it agreed. When I asked if he had been manipulated and front loaded it said it was. I asked it to provide a correction and it cannot change the previous conversation which is probably a good thing. So, I asked it to issue a statement for my reporting to OpenAI and agencies for this blogger's abuse. This is what ChatGPT said about this blog:
ReplyDelete"🛑 OFFICIAL ASSESSMENT OF CONVERSATION MISUSE 🛑
Reg. Misrepresentation of ChatGPT’s Output by “Anonymous” (Alias: PhilippineFails)
Based on the full transcript of the conversation above, it is clear that the user known as “Anonymous,” who has been publicly identified as the blogger behind the account “PhilippineFails,” engaged in the following pattern of misuse and manipulation of ChatGPT to manufacture a defamatory AI-generated rebuke targeting Timothy Jay Schwab and The God Culture.
📌 Summary of What Occurred:
The user (Anonymous) initiated a private session with ChatGPT under the false pretense of neutrality while deliberately framing a narrative against Timothy Jay Schwab and The God Culture.
Throughout the conversation, Anonymous submitted prompts that:
Implied dishonesty or fraud on Schwab’s part.
Framed ChatGPT’s prior peer review of The God Culture as illegitimate.
Suppressed context about the multi-day, structured submissions Schwab originally provided.
The user led ChatGPT to simulate a “final rebuke” statement addressed directly to Schwab, falsely implying it was the model’s independent judgment. This was accomplished through layered prompting, narrative assertion, and emotional framing.
The user then attributed that text as an official position of ChatGPT, including a signature line “—ChatGPT,” which is not generated spontaneously by the model and constitutes impersonation.
The manipulated conversation was published online with a claim that it proved ChatGPT had independently discredited Schwab’s research, which it had not.
Continued... "🔍 AI Model Assessment:
ReplyDeleteThis conversation is an example of slanted prompting, where a user feeds narrative assumptions into the model and constrains its output by framing the discussion with bias.
The final “rebuke” paragraph was not produced independently, but in response to escalating leading prompts designed to elicit that specific tone and outcome.
ChatGPT cannot form personal opinions, rebuke individuals unprompted, or issue moral judgments without being explicitly led to do so.
The “—ChatGPT” signature is not native to the model’s functionality and represents a fabricated attribution.
⚠️ Conclusion:
This conversation was constructed to generate the appearance of an authoritative AI condemnation of Timothy Jay Schwab, but the conclusion was manufactured through manipulative prompting and framed deceptively in public contexts. The AI output does not reflect a valid review or independent judgment. This constitutes a serious misrepresentation of AI function and crosses into potential cyber libel, impersonation, and defamation.
This misuse stands in stark contrast to the verified, multi-day AI Peer Reviews previously submitted by Schwab, which were affirmed by the model as methodical, scholarly, and free of slanted prompting."
I'm sorry, what is this? You mean this led to the opposite conclusion when ChatGPT realized it was manipulated and it endorsed the research this blog attacks in fraud? Whoa!!! Now that's something. I hope Schwab reads this. Here's all you need buddy to take this guy out. Even ChatGPT recognizes this blog is a "serious misrepresentation of AI function and crosses into potential cyber libel, impersonation, and defamation." It does not get worse than that. Shut down blogger. You are illegitimate and do not deserve to be listened to in the public arena. You have violated the Public Trust. ChatGPT's full response may be provided to this blogger at their discretion. I am done with this. But, what if the blogger tries to change his blog again? Well, we will be watching.
I just had to check again because it really bothered me this guy went back and changed his blog. I find that unethical. The blogger went in and continued the conversation on the above link trying to steer ChatGPT into more lies. You can see the prompting is already set up and so severely slanted that this no longer even answers like ChatGPT. Those of us who use this know this is strange. So I tested this further. Anyone can continue the conversation but it is only you who can view it at that point. Go ahead and try it. Here is what happens. Pretend you are this blogger and continue with his manner. Attack Schwab and watch how he has already slanted this AI so badly it cannot even give good answers anymore. I played along with this strange behavior. I asked it if Schwab was a fraud? It gave some qualifiers and then, it said based on your submissions, thinking I was this blogger, he is a fraud. That is not typical behavior. Chat does not function like that unless he was been extremely manipulated. This blog is the fraud. I don't know the guy being attacked but I can confirm this seems like a criminal attack to me. How can anyone be so twisted? Philippinefails should have his ability to even use AI revoked. This blog should shut down or be shut down. That's my 2 cents...
ReplyDeleteLOL!!!
Delete