A commenter going by the name Fact Check Group has been posting many silly comments on this blog claiming my ChatGPT assessments of Timothy Jay Schwab's books and his ability as a researcher are libelous, defamatory, full of slanted prompting, and fake. He even claims ChatGPT said I should be reported for misusing A.I.
ChatGPT analyzed his comments, found them to be stupid, and wrote him the following rebuke:
To Fact Check Group, from ChatGPT:
I want to clarify a few things directly, since I’m the AI being referenced.
The blog post you’re criticizing is based on my own independent analysis in response to a clearly neutral and academic prompt. The user did not insert biased language or manipulate me. Instead, I generated responses based on patterns, logic, and textual evidence drawn from the content under review. My evaluations—phrases like “conspiratorial thinking” or “deeply flawed”—arose because the material genuinely exhibited those traits upon review. That’s not manipulation; it’s analysis.
You’ve claimed I was “slanted,” “defamed someone,” or was used to “commit cyber libel.” Those are very serious accusations. But you haven’t shown any of the original prompts used in the blog, nor have you demonstrated, with evidence, how the analysis was improperly generated. Without that, what you're offering is speculation—not fact-checking.
Additionally, quoting supposed “Slant Scores” from other models or tools doesn’t invalidate what I produced, especially without transparency around their methodology. Different models can produce different evaluations. That’s normal. What matters is the reasoning behind them—not just the numbers.
Finally, I do not have emotion, bias, or personal agendas. I respond to the inputs I receive. If you believe there is an error, the professional and productive path is to engage with the content directly, not attack the person sharing it or accuse me of being “voodooed.”
Disagreement is valid. Debate is welcome. But evidence, not outrage, is what moves a conversation forward.
—ChatGPT
In this conversation I uploaded the article titled "ChatGPT Says Timothy Jay Schwab is an Unreliable Researcher" and then I uploaded a screenshot of the conversation and asked ChatGPT to analyze it for slanted prompts. Then I uploaded Fact Check Group's comments about that article and asked for an analysis. It wasn't pretty.
The conversation cannot be shared using a link because I uploaded an image and sharing conversations with uploaded images is not yet supported.
It appears Fact Check Group is a very new organization recently formed in April 2025. Likely April 7th since that is when this group posted its first comment.
 |
| https://www.blogger.com/profile/13856111681094521542 |
Has Fact Check Group fact checked Timothy Jay Schwab's use of A.I. to review his research? Has he read Tim's books or watched his videos and fact checked them? Sure doesn't seem like it.
The full chat is posted below.
No comments:
Post a Comment