The God Culture: The God Culture Bible

It's official. Timothy Jay Schwab will be publishing The God Culture Bible. What does this mean exactly? What will an official God Culture Bible look like? Thankfully Tim has left us some clues.

Who Changed the Calendar in Israel? And When? RESOLVED Doctrines of Men Exposed

Golden Ladle: Off topic but are you able to list the apocryphal texts that aren't based in scripture? I want to make note of them so I don't waste my time reading. Thank you.

The God Culture: The word is fraud as no such category ever existed in the Temple Library. We are testing them thoroughly and releasing them 1 at a time. We will produce a list once we have vetted them all properly. However, anything not found physically in part or in use in Qumran is highly suspect and likely never Bible Canon. In the end, we will compile all of these into 1 book and then, we will release the modern Canon with corrections to the best of our ability. Scholars have proven they do not care about preserving the word or they would have put the name of YHWH back the 6,800+ times they replaced His name with generic titles instead in illiterate ignorance. Fixing their satanic mess is quite a large task but in time, Yahuah will restore all. They will face the consequences for their acts of cowardice or downright satanic, beast function. Yah Bless.

Note that Tim did not answer this man's question. In fact, it seems he misunderstood it. What the man wanted to know is which books of the Bible are not actually books of the Bible which he should avoid. For Tim this would include Esther and Maccabees at least.

This misunderstanding is a boon for us because we now know where Timothy Jay Schwab of The God Culture is headed. He is going to produce his own Bible. According to this statement, as well as many other statements made throughout his videos, the real Bible Canon is to be found at Qumran. Anything that was not there is "highly suspect and likely never Bible Canon."

Does he not realize that with that standard the New Testament will have to go? No New Testament text was found at Qumran. The leaves us with only the Old Testament plus many other books like Jubilees and The Community Rule and The War Scroll.

That the bulk of this Bible will be the Old Testament sounds pretty cut and dry but it is not. The Old Testament fragments found at Qumran differ from the Masoretic text. 

The discovery of ancient manuscripts in the eleven caves of Khirbet Qumran in the Wilderness of Judah has provided the first full light on the ancient Hebrew text of the Bible in the era before the fixing of text and canon. There is no sign of a canon at Qumran, nor any tendency that can be perceived of the influence of the Rabbinic Recension, or of a drift toward it. Among the Dead Sea Scrolls are many manuscripts that we can label proto-rabbinic in text. But there are also manuscripts related to the Vorlage of the OG Bible, and pentateuchal manuscripts of the Palestinian textual family that gave rise to the Samaritan recension of the Pentateuch. The biblical manuscripts of Qumran exhibit variants of a type that differ toto caelo from the character of the variants found in medieval manuscripts. In the case of a number of biblical books, alternative editions or recensions (as opposed to textual families) were circulating in the several Jewish communities into the Roman period. The most stunning examples are the short text of Jeremiah (related to that used by the OG translator), and the long text of Jeremiah, ancestral to that chosen by the rabbis in their Recension. Manuscripts of proto-Samaritan type show extensive, indeed, in the case of 4QNum (4Q27), systematic editorial expansion. In the case of Daniel, the rabbis chose a short edition, and the OG translators used a longer text edition. This list of long and short editions can be extended. The plurality of text-types and editions at Qumran can be explained in part by remembering that the Zionist revival, beginning in Maccabaean times and extended by Parthian expulsions, brought a flood of Jews from Babylon, Syria, and Egypt back to Jerusalem. Indeed, the bizarre plurality of texts and editions at Qumran is a good illustration of the conditions that produced a crisis and required resolution, namely, the Rabbinic Recension of the early first century C.E.

The Qumran Scrolls force us to grapple in a wholly new way with problems of the canonical text. It is obvious that there was never an “original text” at any one moment of time. Biblical books, those with authors or editors, were revised, rewritten, expanded, truncated. These changes, moreover, took place before the later books were written or edited. Grammar, lexicon, and orthography were brought up to date. So what are we to do in the two areas of textual criticism and establishing anew a plausible doctrine of canon?

The Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls, vol. 1, p. 72-73

This means that the community at Qumran was using a Hebrew text which resembles the Septuagint more than the Masoretic text.

https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/bible-versions-and-translations/the-original-bible-and-the-dead-sea-scrolls/

Some of the Dead Sea Scrolls actually have more in common with the Greek Septuagint than the traditional Hebrew Masoretic Text. This suggests that the Greek translators must have been translating from Hebrew texts that resembled the Dead Sea Scrolls. Are the Dead Sea Scroll texts as trustworthy as these other two sources? Are they as close to the text of the original Bible?

This difference is very crucial especially as it comes to the timeline. Tim is very big on the calendar. Figuring out what the true calendar is is very important to him. According to Timothy Jay Schwab the calendar has been so warped that he does not even know what day or month it is.

Who Changed the Calendar in Israel? And When? RESOLVED Doctrines of Men Exposed

𐤉𐤄𐤅𐤄: What day, month and year is it today?

The God Culture: Frankly, they have done a royal cluster whammy on the modern calendar. Every day is wrong, every Sabbath, every month, and every year is wrong on the supposed Hebrew Calendar as well as the Roman one we use. We are working on reconciliation but every time we opened a portion, it leads to more and more questions. It was quite intentional and the powers behind modern Judaism or Pharisaism by definition in the Jewish Encyclopedia, as well as the Roman Catholic Church, have worked very hard to screw it up. This will be restored in our age. Yah Bless.

Despite saying all that Tim does believe he knows what the correct year is and even claims to know the year Jesus will return, 2127. He bases that on the chronology found in The Book of Jubilees. This book, which was found at Qumran and was held in high esteem by the community, divides all of time into a series of Jubilees or 49 years. There is a huge problem with that which is the chronology in Jubilees does not agree with either the Septuagint or Masoretic texts of Genesis. You cannot have Genesis and Jubilees in the same book calling them scripture when they are diametrically opposed to one another. 

Because of these differences Tim would also have to decide which text of the Bible he would use. The Septuagint or the Masoretic. We have the Masoretic text in full but all the Hebrew texts found at Qumran are fragments. That the Dead Sea Scrolls are all fragments is another big hurdle Tim would have to leap. Geza Vermes' translation of the scrolls looks like this:

You see all the brackets, parentheses, and ellipses? Those are places where the text is missing or supplied by the translator. The fact is if any of the books particular to the Qumran community such as the War Scroll were to be deemed by Timothy Jay Schwab to be scripture and fit for inclusion in The God Culture Bible then they would be full of holes because portions are missing.

Which translation would The God Culture Bible use? The KJV? Brenton's Septuagint? A synthesis of the two? Will it be a completely new translation based on the Hebrew and Aramic texts found at Qumran? Of course not because while every book in the Bible except Esther was found in the caves they are all in fragments and are completely unaccessible to Tim. Sure you can view a few copies on the internet which have been scanned for all to see but the vast bulk of scrolls are hidden away from the general public. They are 2,000 years old after all and need serious care to remain intact. As for the scrolls unique to Qumran he would have to publish his own translation since current translations are all copyrighted. Again, he cannot do this because he does not have access to them. But even if he did he any translation would be fragmentary and would require him to make educated guesses in many places and would not be the actual text used by the separatist Qumran community.

What exactly will Tim be testing and vetting since he has no access to the Dead Sea Scrolls except for what has been published for popular reading such as the edition by Geza Vermes? It's odd that Tim cites only Vermes when there are other translations out there such as the one by Florentino Garcia Martinez. That he only cites one translation is a red flag that Tim is not actually doing any real research on the matter. He claims that he reads scholarly literature from time to time but that seems very doubtful because he never cites any of that literature which he claims to have indisputably rebutted.

Exodus is in the Bible so it can be safely assumed that it will be included in The God Culture Bible. But will it include Exodus 4:24 which Tim says does not fit and which contradicts Jubilees?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V54mWhuiH0w&lc=UgwvjOotDuuoqhsMJSB4AaABAg

mbeatg : Hello, can you address Exodus 4:24. I heard you address Jasher. Based on Jubilees, would you consider this more “ Leaven”

The God Culture : It does not fit indeed. Yah Bless.

Surely Tim will "restore" Cainian to Genesis 10:24 which is missing in the Masoretic text but remains in the Septuagint. Tim has a whole video about this missing word and how it proves the Pharisees intentionally corrupted the text. If he did so that would mean giving credence to the Septuagint so he might as well publish that translation which agrees with the Hebrew texts found at Qumran. But on what basis would he do that? It could not be based on any of the fragments of Genesis found at Qumran and to which he has no access. 

Any modern bible worth its salt has several maps in the back. They show the Exodus, the travels of Paul and the travels of Jesus, as well as the Northern and Southern Kingdoms of Israel and Judah. Will The God Culture Bible have a map of the Philippines showing that the Garden of Eden is underneath the floor of the Sulu Sea? 

Where is the Garden of Eden? Answers In Jubilees: Part 8

Will The God Culture Bible have maps showing the great ocean trench system which Tim claims are the rivers from Eden?

Timothy Jay Schwab's Rivers From Eden map

Surely The God Culture Bible will contain a map of Noah's division of the earth with its references to Fairbanks, Alaska and Bengali slang.

The cold hard fact is that Timothy Jay Schwab could never publish a Bible based on the Dead Sea Scrolls which is 100% faithful to those texts because they are fragmented and he has no access to them. If he sticks to his guiding principle that the Qumran community kept the true canon of scripture then he could absolutely not include the New Testament. The New Testament was compiled and collected by the Church. The canon of the New Testament was decided, not by authoritarian Popes as Tim claims, but through constant usage in the liturgy. Subsequently that canon was confirmed at the Council of Carthage in 397.

If Tim did include the New Testament that would be a huge blow to his stated principle that the community at Qumran kept the true canon. He would have to give a reason for the canonicity of the New Testament and he would not be able to appeal to the Church which he considers to be the Synagogue of Satan. The fact is that neither Timothy Jay Schwab nor anyone else can give a coherent reason that the New Testament is scripture without appealing to the witness of the Church. 

In short this whole business of The God Culture Bible is a nonsensical waste of time. It is also more confirmation that The God Culture is a cult and Timothy Jay Schwab is a cult leader. Every heretical sect and cult has its own scriptures. Once The God Culture Bible is published that will set a mark upon Timothy Jay Schwab and his group. They will be no different than the Mormons or the Jehovah's Witnesses or the Urantians who each have their own Bibles.

The God Culture: Dine with the Ancestors Havilah Rites of the Lakanate of Tondo

While tracing a few leads trying to find the origin of the resurgence of the Philippines is Ophir doctrine in modern times I ran across something quite odd that goes by the name of the "Dine with the Ancestors Havilah Rites of the Lakanate of Tondo." On May 12th, 2019 Timothy Jay Schwab of The God Culture took part in these rites.

The "Dine with the Ancestors Havilah Rites of the Lakanate of Tondo". As suggested by Pastor Paul Medrano, this special rite is a variation of the classic Dine with the Ancestors Ritual but this is done when the participants talks about the Lakanate of Tondo; and the Hebrew, Ophir, and the Lakanate of Lawan connections of the ancient Philippine civilization. This rite happened on May 12: the Dine with the Ancestors Havilah Rites started with the arrival welcome through a ringing of a bell in the House of Dulay Mendoza of the Lakanate of Tondo in Marikina Valley. 

Then the guests talked freely while partaking grapes kept in the ancient plates that came from the Lakan Dula household and red wine on top of an antique table, and beside an antique lamp and the bayonet of Ceferino Dulay, the 4th hereditary leader of the Dulay Clan of Marikina Valley when he was a guerilla leader during WW ll and the guests also played with friendly poodles surnamed by the Philippine Canine Club as Dulay. Then they proceeded to the House of Kapitan Moy, the founder of Marikina shoe industry, Marikina being the Shoe Capital of the Philippines, then walked across the Miraculous Shrine of Our Lady of the Abandoned, one of the ten prettiest churches in Metro Manila and host of the third longest Holy Week procession in the Philippines. Then, the guests proceeded to the secret cemetery of the church to visit the tomb of the Hebrew - blooded Juana Mendoza Cerbito and Ceferino Rivas Dulay, a descendant of Lakan Dula. Then the guests went to the Shoe Museum, an old Spanish Jail where Macario Sakay of Tondo was jailed and presently keeps the famous shoes of Imelda Marcos of Samar Leyte, and, finally back to the House of the Dulay Mendoza for a Marikina dinner of local dishes of waknatoy, everlasting, locally grown fruits, as well as prunes and nuts from the middle eastern countries -- to have the taste of Havilah. Timothy, the author of the famous Solomon's Gold, the God Culture in the You Tube announced a change of his name into Pedro. This rite is only done for Top Leaders of an organization. 

Some of the talks during the visit was that Manila Mayor Isko Moreno is from Allen, a part of Northern Samar, which according to Australian studies, a part of the Philippines which is the homeland of the Polynesians. Otley Bayer said that there are already people in the Philippines 250,000 years ago and this was confirmed by a French study which says that the Philippines has been populated by men as early as 700,000 years ago. Some old Filipino historians still have the mindset of "Filipinos are savage and it has to be discovered and cultured by anything foreign". These local historians refuse to mention that there is a civilization of Viking – like people based in the Lakanate of Lawan in Northern Samar (Samar was derived from Samaria). The Samar civilization was once headed by Datu Iberein as written by historian Henry Scott, and take note of the name -- very Jewish -- and consistent with Jewish Samar from Samaria. These people have siday (native epic) in which one of them is Bingi of Lawan, as mentioned by historian Alcina. They have the Almuraya which is an ancient ruin and they have royal burial jars -- all evidences would point that this civilization could be the biblical Ophir, the homeland of the Polynesians and Viking – like people who sent people to Tondo and different parts of the Philippines. and islands in the Pacific Ocean, including the people of Taiwan.  

https://sites.google.com/site/truelakandula/clanhouse?overridemobile=true

In May of 2019 in between stops on his RISE UP evangelical conference tour Timothy Jay Schwab and his wife participated in the secret "Dine with the Ancestors Havilah Rites of the Lakanate of Tondo."  This consists in partaking of grapes and red wine served on top of an antique table and surrounded by artifacts from the ancestors consisting of an antique lamp and WW 2 era bayonet.  It looked like this:

https://www.facebook.com/batangdula/photos/pcb.2993671647324537/2993670120658023/?type=3&theater

I don't want to be a party pooper but who participates in secret rites in front of the television? And who, when they are invited to an auspicious and secret ritualistic dinner with the ancestors, dresses like a schlub?

https://www.facebook.com/batangdula/photos/pcb.2993671647324537/2993670307324671/?type=3&theater

Did Timothy leave all his pants, polo t-shirts, and shoes back in the states? 

Is this just a regular dinner with some important or rich people? No. It's not. The Lakanate of Tondo is one of the Royal Houses of the Philippines. Sofronio Dulay, also know as Toti, is the Grand Patriarch of the Lakan Dula Clan as well as the Grand Patriarch of the Principalia Hereditary Council of the Philippines.

https://sites.google.com/site/truelakandula/royal-houses

Sofronio Dulay's CV can be read here.  It is rather extensive but when reading it things become clear real quick. He has been involved in print media and at one time worked for the Family Planning Council of the Philippines which is a subsidiary of the International Planned Parenthood Foundation. He even organized an IPPF conference in 1994. According to his biography he was a member of the Knights of Columbus and is currently a member of Opus Dei both Roman Catholic organizations. What kind of Roman Catholic works for Planed Parenthood? His biography and CV coupled with the fact that he is part of a noble house screams globalist and in fact he recently made a video advocating for world government.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRlBhFRMe9A

In this video Sofronio Dulay reads from the Globalist Manifesto and gives his thoughts on the matter. This manifesto can be found on his own website here. Added to the globalist manifesto are the Illuminati Prime Directives. The author of this page says they are not part of the original manifesto but are meant to smear the Jews. Then why add them? Because those directives are the plan for global government. They are the goals many have been working towards for over a century now. Namely population reduction. sterilization, vegetarianism, and the elimination of nationalism. In the above video Sofronio Dulay says something quite odd at 15:23.  He says: 

World government's objective is to save the world, save humanity. Don't ask who is behind me, who is orchestrating me. They are irrelevant!

Obviously someone is behind him orchestrating the show and he knows it. He doesn't want you to know it. "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!" It's a deeper rabbit hole down which to plunge involving his Alma Mater the Asian Institute of Management which was started by the Harvard business school and the Ford Foundation, one of the most unapologetically globalist foundations there is. The AIM is a school whose aim is to train globalists.

Back to the dinner ritual. After partaking of the grapes and the wine and visiting the dead Timothy was reborn.

Timothy, the author of the famous Solomon's Gold, the God Culture in the You Tube announced a change of his name into Pedro. This rite is only done for Top Leaders of an organization. 

Tim ritualistically ate grapes and drank wine on an old table surrounded by the ancestors. Then Tim, as "a Top Leader of an organization," was born again receiving the new name of Pedro. 

Think of the symbology of this secret rite. The symbology of transformation. The grapes are transformed into wine. The symbol of death and rebirth. Wine as the blood of the grape. Wine as blood of the ancestors. Drinking said blood while being surrounded by symbols of the dead ancestors.  The antique lamp with its light representing their wisdom. Both the antique plates and the bayonet being fetish objects which the spirits of the ancestors inhabit. Afterwards they go visit a secret cemetery where the dead ancestors lie buried and pay them homage. One of them even had Hebrew blood coursing through his veins while he lived. Then they go visit a museum where Imelda Marcos's shoes are on display. What about the symbol of the shoes? Figuratively the Marcos' walked all over Filipinos when they were in power. Those shoes represent the power of the ruling elite of which Sofronio Dulay is a part even though he does not want you to know that.

Their unassuming secretive patriarch of the modern times does not rule, he reigns privately with circle of personal advisers, the personal leadership style he inherited from the earlier traditional leaders of the descendancy,  a reaction from the centuries of Spanish persecutions. He might even deny his hereditary and historical role and designation; or he might point to somebody else when talking to a non descendant. Descendants who are close to the patriarch will  not point directly to him as their patriarch but if needed, they will only indirectly identify him as the one who has been very active in coordinating the present Lakanate of Tondo.

https://sites.google.com/site/truelakandula/clanhouse

As the scripture says:  

Psalm 60:8 Moab is my washpot; over Edom will I cast out my shoe: Philistia, triumph thou because of me.

Meaning Edom shall become a slavish subject just as Filipinos were slavishly subjected to the yoke of the Marcoses. The shoe is a symbol of ruling power.

After all these rituals are completed Tim is then born again taking on the new and secret name of Pedro. Why Pedro? Pedro is Spanish for Peter. The Apostle Peter was the Apostle to the circumcision or Israel.  Now Tim (Pedro) has relocated to the Philippines where he will be holding evangelistic conferences preaching to Filipinos whom he believes are part of the lost tribes of Israel.

Why is Tim (Pedro) in this house of a noble family patriarch, the house of a king as it were, partaking in occult rituals which culminate in the initiatory rite of his being born again with a new name? Such a connection would explain a lot about who Tim is, what he is doing in the Philippines, and who is backing him. Not just any foreigner comes to the Philippines and starts hobnobbing with the royal elite. It appears that it might be Pastor Paul Medrano who brought Tim to the attention of Sofrontio Dulay but I cannot say for sure. I can find no information online about him or what church he allegedly pastors.

Think of the hypocrisy here as well.  Tim (Pedro) says we have to worship on the Sabbath (Saturday) and keep the Feasts of the Lord because all else (Sunday, Easter, Christmas) are pagan. Yet this man has participated in an occult symbolic blood ritual wherein he was born again and given a new name. A ritual that is not so very different from the initiation rites of the Skull and Bones or the Freemasons.

In the recent video "What's Going On?" Tim (Pedro) reflects on the nationwide, indeed worldwide, quarantine and lockdown positing that God is forcing the whole world to take a sabbath. 

https://youtu.be/jKZVJqs7iS8

He starts off by saying at 0:58

As I look out over the Philippine landscape I see its majestic mountains of Eden and it causes me to pause and reflect on their importance. On the significance of this land of creation.

How is Tim (Pedro) able to see the mountains of Eden when there is a Cherubim with a flaming sword keeping out all comers? (Gen 3:24)  How did Tim get past that fearsome guardian and into Eden?

Next he says at 1:58

And all of a sudden a familiar sound from a neighboring house. What do Filipinos do when they are home? Well, karaoke of course.  I'm kidding. It's usually special occasions and some after consuming much alcohol but this one they didn't need alcohol for they began singing at 7 am.  Now before one thinks this is a bad thing remember the prophesy of Isaiah the Philippines will sing a new song.

This is exactly what I meant when I wrote that for Tim "Filipinos as they are cease to exist and instead become the idealized fantasies he wishes for them to be." In this case instead of being unbelievably rude by singing karaoke at 7 am it is only a reminder that one day these members of the lost tribes of Israel will be singing a new song to the Lord. What does he think when he opens his window in the morning and breathes in the smoke of a burning trash or leaf pile?

Perhaps instead of seeing and smelling a noxious pile of burning leaves he is reminded of this verse from Revelation:

And the smoke of the incense, which came with the prayers of the saints, ascended up before God out of the angel's hand. 

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Revelation-8-4/

The latter part of this video consists of Tim (Pedro) lying to his audience by telling them that Constantine changed the Sabbath day to Sunday.

https://youtu.be/jKZVJqs7iS8

It is obvious he did not read the book he is quoting from as he calls the author, Philip Schaff, a Catholic. Schaff was actually a Protestant and he wrote one of the best Church Histories out there. He would do well to read it. If only Tim (Pedro) had read the preceding paragraphs he would have been disabused of the false notion that Constantine changed the Christian day of worship from Saturday to Sunday.

The observance of Sunday originated in the time of the apostles, and ever since forms the basis of public worship, with its ennobling, sanctifying, and cheering influences, in all Christian lands. 

The Christian Sabbath is, on the one hand, the continuation and the regeneration of the Jewish Sabbath, based upon God’s resting from the creation and upon the fourth commandment of the decalogue, which, as to its substance, is not of merely national application, like the ceremonial and civil law, but of universal import and perpetual validity for mankind. It is, on the other hand, a new creation of the gospel, a memorial of the resurrection of Christ and of the work of redemption completed and divinely sealed thereby. It rests, we may say, upon the threefold basis of the original creation, the Jewish legislation, and the Christian redemption, and is rooted in the physical, the moral, and the religious wants of our nature. It has a legal and an evangelical aspect. Like the law in general, the institution of the Christian Sabbath is a wholesome restraint upon the people, and a schoolmaster to lead them to Christ. But it is also strictly evangelical: it was originally made for the benefit of man, like the family, with which it goes back beyond the fall to the paradise of innocence, as the second institution of God on earth; it was "a delight" to the pious of the old dispensation (Isa. lviii. 13), and now, under the new, it is fraught with the glorious memories and blessings of Christ’s resurrection and the outpouring of the Holy Spirit. The Christian Sabbath is the ancient Sabbath baptized with fire and the Holy Ghost, regenerated, spiritualized, and glorified. It is the connecting link of creation and redemption, of paradise lost, and paradise regained, and a pledge and preparation for the saints’ everlasting rest in heaven.

https://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/history/3_ch07.htm

He does not have to agree with the reasons that the Church has worshipped on Sunday since the time of the Apostles but he has no right to lie about the matter. Why does Tim (Pedro) continue to lie about this subject of the sabbath?  He goes on in the video to say the cross is not a Christian symbol but originates with Mithras. Cleary the man is in a sect of his own making as he advocates positions held by both the Seventh Day Adventists who are Sabbatarians and the Jehovah's Witnesses who call the cross pagan. He also has his own bizarre ideas about the "clock of creation" which he pontificates on in the first part of the video. 

I will tell you why he focuses on the sabbath so much.  It is because his whole scheme of religion (relationship he says) consists in faith in Christ plus keeping the law.

https://youtu.be/P1bOSmv711k

In the video "Lost Tribes Series: Part 4A: Grafted Into the Kingdom" Tim (Pedro) lays out on the table for all to see what he thinks salvation consists of. The gist of it is that a man must believe in Christ and keep the law. The law has not passed away says Tim (Pedro) therefore we are bound to keep the Mosaic law. He does not mention this but the Mosaic law includes commandments about sacrifices, festivals, shaving, dietary laws, menstruation and many other things of which the Apostle Peter says:

Acts 15:10: Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Acts-15-10/

The Mosaic law does not consist of just the ten commandments as a code for personal holiness. Rather it consists of hundreds of laws designed to erect a religious and civic polity for the nation of Israel.  It is a national code of law involving all circumstances of life. The Mosaic law with all its promises and curses (Deuteronomy 28) is the substance of the covenant God made with the nation of Israel. Apart from living in a society that is structured on this code, apart from being in the covenant nation of Israel there is no keeping of the law.

Tim (Pedro) is an absolute fool to think he or anyone can keep the Mosaic law. The law demands perfect obedience and neither Tim (Pedro) nor anyone else will ever manifest that obedience. Without engaging in a protracted theological discourse let me point out that in this video Tim (Pedro) spews forth his extreme ignorance of the scriptures and the plan of salvation it contains.

He is ignorant of the new covenant which differs from that made at Sinai.  Jeremiah 31: 31-34.

He is ignorant that this new covenant is made through the shed blood of Jesus Christ. Matthew 26:28.

He is ignorant of the fact that Jesus Christ is not a priest after the order of the Levites but after Melchisidec and that as a consequence of the priesthood changing the law has been changed.  Hebrews 7:11-12.

He is ignorant of that fact that Paul equates the covenant at Mt. Sinai with Hagar, who represents the flesh, and bondage.  Galatians 4:22-29. 

He is ignorant of the fact that the law is a schoolmaster who leads us to Christ. Galatians 3:24

He is ignorant of the fact that righteousness does not come through the law nor is their a synergy between the law and faith but all our righteousness comes from Christ or else he died in vain. Galatians 2:21.

He is ignorant that Jesus Christ himself abrogates the Mosaic law in the Sermon on the Mount when he says several times, "You have heard it said...But I say unto you." For example Jesus contradicts Moses by forbidding divorce except in the case of adultery and by forbidding the divorced parties to remarry. That is to say Jesus forbids divorce and remarriage which is stricter than even Moses!  (Matthew 5:32 and Matthew 19:3-9) Anyone who has divorced their spouse except for adultery or married a divorced person is in a state of lawlessness and no amount of law keeping can rectify that situation.

He is completely ignorant of the power and sovereignty of God saying at the beginning of this video that God did not cause 9/11 while in the video "What is Going On?" he refuses to say God has brought about COVID-19. The God he worships is completely caught unawares by these events whereas the Bible is very clear that God brings about all things and does whatsoever he will upon the earth.  

Amos 3:6 “Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD hath not done it?” 

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Amos-3-6/

Isaiah 45:7 “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.” 

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Isaiah-45-7/

Daniel 4:35 “And all the inhabitants of the earth are reputed as nothing: and he doeth according to his will in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth: and none can stay his hand, or say unto him, What doest thou?” 

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Daniel-4-35/

In short Tim (Pedro) is ignorant of church history, ignorant of the purpose for which Jesus Christ died and rose again, ignorant of the plan of salvation, ignorant of man's spiritual state (Jeremiah 17:9) because he thinks man is able to keep the law, ignorant of the new covenant, ignorant of the necessity of having a circumcised heart, ignorant of the need to be born again and filled with the Holy Spirit, ignorant of basic Christianity which teaches that the law is fulfilled in and by Christ, ignorant that the Gospel saves while the law condemns. As John says:

John 1:17 "For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.” 

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/John-1-17/

But then again Tim (Pedro) might not be ignorant of these things at all. Rather he might be willingly teaching these false doctrines as he says he was once a part of the church and now he rejects what the church teaches! He is out to change paradigms and "Challenge Tradition." If that is the case then he is nothing but an obstinate heretic.

Where do we even go from here?

Now that we know Tim (Pedro) has participated in an initiatory occult ritual with the Roman Catholic Patriarch of one of the royal houses of the Philippines it is time to ask who is this man? Why is he hanging out with the royal elite who promote globalism? Who is funding him and his evangelistic conferences? Who brought him here to preach his false doctrine? Who are the members of his alleged research team? How far down does the rabbit hole go with The God Culture and Timothy (Pedro) Jay Schwab?

The God Culture: Noah Landed on Mt. Everest

The God Culture is just awful.  In video after video Timothy Jay Schwab leads his listeners down a rabbit hole of lies. By the end of each video one is either deeply impressed by Tim's profuse knowledge of scriptural arcana and occult history or saddened that so many people are stupid enough to be snookered into believing anything he has to say. 

In this article I want to look at video number 5 in his Flood Series.

https://youtu.be/48-XtI0JAIs

There is so much misinformation in this video it is incredible. In this short space I cannot possibly break it down bit-by-bit and give it the proper attention and justice it deserves. For that I would have to write a book. Instead I will take a look at a few items which are either lies or just plain outrageous or maybe even both.

First it is necessary to understand Tim's cosmogony.  He believes the Earth is flat and that there were no oceans before the flood.  During the flood the great waters of the deep burst forth and the waters in the heavens rained down. The waters from the deep receded into the bowels of the earth and the waters from heaven remained forming the oceans. This is why he believes the undersea trenches are the river system of The Garden of Eden which is now submerged somewhere off the coast of the Philippines. It is also why he does not believe in plate tectonics.

6:19  For those espousing pangaea, or really Pan Gaia, an occult religious belief not science, the hydroplate theory which relies on the false science of moving plates floating on magma smashing to gather understand that at 1,000 miles per hour at the equator such chaotic motion would never lead to a separation of continents but the opposite.  It would lead to there only being one continent and it would be a mountain all the way into space likely.  Accusing Yahuah of creating such chaos is a lack of faith truly and certainly not a Biblical perspective.   

Elsewhere Tim says plate tectonics is unproven.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jAQ08tJUpY&lc=Ugyl6Q3FI3sHj2ocu8d4AaABAg

We have but we reject the unproven science of moving plates floating on magma nor liquid. If we have such, a simple scientific test would tell us there would only be 1 continent and it would be a mountain into space with the earth moving at 1000 mph at the equator. No one has ever observed such. Furthermore, Moses speaks of the ancient mountains and lasting hills meaning from before the Flood. Land didn't move, it got carved out by mega tsunamis and rapid erosion. Yahuah God Bless.

The amount of ignorance here is astounding and the person Tim is replying to points that out.  I do not intend to delve into geology as there are plenty of places on the internet that explain plate tectonics and sea floor spreading and much more.  It is certainly not an unproven science.  It is a theory that fits all the observable facts. Tim has no idea what he is talking about. He is not a geologist or a scientist of any kind. Where does he get the idea that if plate tectonics were true there would be one continent reaching into space? On what calculations is he basing that nonsense?  He does not say.

For Tim having a Biblical perspective means something different than what it means for others. Usually to have a Biblical perspective means you believe God is in control, he created the world, Christ is risen, all things work for the good, and things like that.  For Tim it means if something is not explicitly in the Bible then it's not true.

9:22  But here we place scripture above false claims and the claims of man. If it cannot be proven from scripture throw it out.

This sentence is loaded with irony as Tim makes countless false claims and even defends those claims using scripture. Over-literalism of the Bible is going to lead you down a wrong path. I cannot prove from the scripture that Timothy Jay Schwab exists. Does that mean he does not exist?  I cannot prove from scripture many things that are true such as mathematics, Chinese history, and science of all kinds. Does that mean math is false and that the Chinese have no history? No, and the idea is absurd.

Robert Terry, who Tim is replying to in the Youtube comment above, replies with the following comment:

The hydroplate theory is far superior to what you have to offer. For starters- You use a “the Bible must be right” sort of reasoning to “prove” science right or wrong. This is faulty reasoning! You will likely push more people away then convince with logic like this. Frankly, you sound like a brainwashed lunatic! Don’t get me wrong, I personally believe the Bible is right..... However, I favor a more intelligent line of reasoning: what we observe “scientifically”, lines up perfectly with what the Bible says. Therefore “proving” (a term you throw around a little to freely) the Bible correct. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jAQ08tJUpY&lc=Ugyl6Q3FI3sHj2ocu8d4AaABAg

Robert is correct.  You cannot use the bible to prove if science is right or wrong as it is not a science text book. He is also right that Tim throws the word "proving" around way too freely. Tim makes claims of all kinds and then says he has now proven this or that claim. But he hasn't proven anything except that he is too willing to jump to conclusions that are unwarranted.

15:59 Before the British had the audacity to rename the tallest mountain on earth (The nerve! I mean who thinks they have the right to rename such an icon) it was called in Sanskrit and still is today in Nepal Sagarmatha which has a meaning which just cannot be possible. Can it? It means, get this, head of the ocean or forehead of the sea or sky. What? How can that be? Forehead of the sky? Ok. Certainly. That's fine. Makes sense. But forehead or head of the ocean? Where would that originate? Well that's pretty easy as the Bible just told you twice this was the case. This was where the ark landed.

Practically all of that is a lie. Sagarmatha is not an ancient name for Mt. Everest. It is a name invented by the Nepalese government recently. At least according to Walt Unsworth who is referenced on the Mt. Everest Wikipedia page.

https://www.amazon.com/Everest-Mountaineering-History-Walt-Unsworth/dp/0898866707

Tim's source for his claims is not actually listed on his slide.  Only half of the link is given.  The full link is https://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~rwest/wikispeedia/wpcd/wp/m/Mount_Everest.htm. Why not just use the regular Wikipedia page instead of the Wiki archive at the above link? It does not make sense. Even that strange page tells us that the name Sagarmatha was invented in the 1960's!

In Nepal, the mountain is called Sagarmatha (सगरमाथा, Sanskrit for "Head of the Ocean"); this name was invented in the early 1960s (by Baburam Acharya) when the Nepalese government realized that Mount Everest had no Nepalese name. This was because the mountain was not known and named in ethnic Nepal (the Kathmandu valley and surrounding areas). The Sherpa/Tibetan name Chomolangma was not acceptable, as it would have been against the idea of unification (Nepalization) of the country. However, the ancient name for the mountain is Devgiri (in Sanskrit, it means "holy mountain") or Devadurga (the English pronounced it as deodungha in the 1800s); please refer to the Harrapan archaeology site for more on the history behind the name. In Tibetan it is Chomolungma or Qomolangma (ཇོ་མོ་གླང་མ) ("Mother of the Universe"), or in Chinese: 珠穆朗瑪峰 ( pinyin: Zhūmùlǎngmǎ Fēng) or 聖母峰 (Shèngmǔ Fēng).

Why is Tim trying to pass off Sagarmatha as being an ancient name for Mt. Everest? His own source shows that he is lying! Did he not read the whole paragraph? This is also the only place I see interpreting Sagarmatha as Head of the Ocean. One website explicitly says "sagar" does not mean ocean.

Sagarmatha is a Sanskrit word, from sagar = "sky" (not to be confused with "sea/ocean") and matha = "forehead" or "head", and is the modern Nepali name for Mount Everest. 

https://www.grida.no/resources/3031

Elsewhere, as on the Wikipedia page for Mt. Everest, the name is interpreted as "Goddess of the Sky" and Encyclopedia Britannica has "Peak of Heaven."

The Sanskrit name Sagarmatha means literally “Peak of Heaven.”

https://www.britannica.com/place/Mount-Everest

A few minutes after this Tim claims that Google maps proves that Noah landed on Mt. Everest.

18:02 So Noah did not land and stay on the very summit but it slid down. And would you look at this? This is right from Google maps from the satellite view and inset street view.  What the name of this place next to what they call the Hillary Step, which is where they stage climbs of Mt. Everest, well its none other than Arkhale! Wait a minute.  Even Google maps records to this day that the ark landed there. What!?

The Hillary Step is where they stage climbs of Mt. Everest?  No!  That would be base camp.

The Hillary Step was a nearly vertical rock face with a height of around 12 metres (39 ft) located very high on Mount Everest at approximately 8,790 metres (28,839 ft) above sea level, near the summit. It was located on the southeast ridge, halfway between the "South Summit" and the true summit, and it gave climbers the last real challenge before reaching the top of the mountain via the southeast route.

The Hillary Step was destroyed most likely during a massive earthquake that hit the region in 2015

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Step

The Hillary Step was basically near the peak of the mountain. It no longer exists. As for Arkhale it is listed as an area on Everest on Google maps. There is no information on this place as far as I can find so it's not clear what it is exactly. Tim makes way too much ado about this place. If Arkhale is a special name proving that Noah's ark landed on Mt. Everest then why is there a village in Nepal called Arkhale? This small village even has it's own Wikipedia page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkhale,_Khotang

Did he even consider this fact? Again Tim has no idea what he is talking about. But he sure sounds like he does. Rather than telling us the Sanskrit meaning of Arkhale he foolishly attempts to make this name into a Hebrew word meaning Ark Hallelujah! What a cunning linguist!

Next Tim answers questions asked by viewers.

20:01 Now did Noah need an oxygen mask on Mt. Everest? Well, no. The base camp, also known as Arkhale on Google we just showed you is actually 3,500 meters below the summit where the ark would have slid down to as the water level lowered and as you can see from the picture oxygen is not needed like it is in scaling the summit obviously. However once again this is right after the flood and the world ecosystem is not what it is today.   

According to science oxygen levels prior to the flood based on petrified sap bubbles would have been much greater.  Not only does this answer why Noah had no issue with oxygen but also good reason as to why the lifespans of Noah's ancestors were so much longer before the flood.  They had more oxygen.

Again Arkhale is NOT base camp. 

Tim does not answer the question though he thinks he does. First of all in Tim's scheme Noah is floating in a boat ABOVE Mt. Everest for a few months. That is a problem and the issue is not the amount of oxygen in the air but the fact that at higher altitudes the atmosphere gets thinner making it more difficult to breathe. Gravity draws the oxygen towards the surface so there is less oxygen the higher you ascend.

When you travel to a place above about 8,000 feet, your body starts telling you there’s something seriously wrong with the air up there. The “thin” air at high altitudes has considerably less oxygen and pressure. This is because the earth’s gravity holds the oxygen close to the surface — so much so that half of the oxygen in the atmosphere is found below 18,000 feet. 

https://scienceline.org/2015/02/why-do-you-feel-so-awful-at-high-altitudes/

Did Tim forget that Noah and all the animals had been sitting 15 cubits above Mt. Everest for several months? The source for his answer is stunning for all it's hypocrisy.

“One implication is that the atmospheric pressure of the Earth would have been much greater during the Cretaceous era, when the bubbles formed in the resin. A dense atmosphere could also explain how the ungainly pterosaur, with its stubby body and wing span of up to 11 meters, could have stayed airborne, he said. The spread of angiosperms, flowering plants, during the Cretaceous era could have caused the high oxygen levels reported by Berner and Landis, scientists said last week.” (Anderson, Ian, “Dinosaurs Breathed Air Rich in Oxygen,” New Scientist, vol. 116, 1987, p. 25.)

https://www.genesispark.com/exhibits/early-earth/atmosphere/

The Cretaceous era?  Does Tim now believe in long geologic periods of time consisting of millions of years?? Why would he quote a piece from an article based on a science he rejects as false!? That is hypocrisy. He also wrongly attributes that quote to Leah Crane's article "Earth could have more water than we thought while exoplanets have less."

21:31  How did the animals scale Mt. Everest?  Well, just like this little guy perhaps? Actually that would not be necessary at all because again the ark did not stay on the very tip of the summit as some erroneously speculate and they would have had a much easier time from the base camp or Arkhale area going down. 

As showed above Arkhale is NOT base camp so if the ark did land at Arkhale they would certainly have had to scale the mountain. Tim is ignoring the elephant in the room here.  The elephant in the ark actually. How would the elephants have walked down the mountain and to Africa? 

If you have followed this series of articles about The God Culture or actually watched their videos you should know that The God Culture does not do archaeology.  A commenter pointed this out on their Youtube page for this video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48-XtI0JAIs&lc=UgwJAgYCp764Bne8FuZ4AaABAg.8xlYfIXFSH48xnfSm-ZT_k

@Tribe of Judah shallow claim? The Turkish government thought it was confirmation enough to turn the area into a nation park so they might disagree with you. Not to mention the narrator is using what the internet? Ron wyatt actually went out and tested what he knew to be true like the bible says to do.

This person is correct.  All of Tim's "research" is based on him reading articles on the internet and putting things together like a math problem.  He has not gone into the real world to find support for his claims.  He will never show you the ruins of the palace of the Queen of Sheba. Tim actually thinks those who demand he show archeological proofs for his claims are operating within an occult paradigm.

25:33 But if Noah and his sons landed on Mt. Everest can we find additional support that they actually settled there? Hm? We can find support. Let's go for it. Which frankly this far back is rather miraculous when you think about it given the circumstances. These are extremely ancient and to think they left archaeology to find may not be so simple and to hold one to that standard as a must is really an occult paradigm that assumes that we must find great architecture in order to prove recorded history especially in an era not known for great architecture largely.

Right here Tim disavows archaeology.  He does not need it and to demand such proof from him is evil. That is ridiculous! He will also falsely go on to say this:

41:50 And finally though we could go on and on the ark has never been found nor unearthed nor one ounce of archaeology ever done to prove it sits in any form on top of that mountain in Turkey.  

That is a very stupid thing to say. Sure the ark has never been found but plenty of people including Ron Wyatt have done extensive archeological excavations in Turkey to look for the ark. To this day such research continues. Just a few weeks ago Forbidden History released an episode about the search for Noah's Ark. Tim does not have to agree with the research but to say such research has never occurred is not true. It is only Tim who is making great claims who has done ZERO archeological research.

What about Ararat? What about the alleged finds in Turkey? Tim has an answer for that too.

31:41 Egypt is more likely a Nephilim community in those days, not human. Nephilim may have proceeded them in Mesopotamia as well as they certainly lived there and frankly if there was a ship found on Mt. Ararat in Turkey, or whatever it used to be called when it had a real name not a fake one that was assigned to it that is even wrong, it is far more likely a Nephilim vessel carrying giants over the flood. See they survived somehow. And remember they do not have the breath of life and all with the breath of life perished during the flood at least of those not on the ark. Nephilim do not have the breath of life. 

I do not even know how to respond to that. It's so bizarre and stupid and contrary to the scriptures which say the flood killed all life. Marine life excepted of course. But according to Tim the Nephilim built an ark and survived the flood founding Egypt and Mesopotamia and their boat is what has been mistaken for Noah's! The appropriate response is a hearty belly busting laugh.

This will bring us to the last part of the review and that is Timothy's comments about Josephus.

43:08 Mt. Ararat in Turkey is the wrong mountain. Period. But there did this originate?  In all fairness to mourn scholars not them, they didn't make this up, this comes from Joesphus. An occult legend in fact which he cites. But come on scholars. Test things at least a little.  Don't accept the word of a self admitted Pharisee over the Bible quoting occult legend. Test it. Now we will. 

In Antiquities of the Jews Flavius Josephus propagates this myth based on occult pagan legend and not scripture. Here he quotes whom he even admits to be a Chaldean or better termed magician or sorcerer an enemy of the prophets, the writers of the Bible. So not a likely source to pin doctrine.   

Berosus the Chaldean says, this is Josephus' writing, It is said there is still some part of the ship in Armenia at the mountain of the Cordyaeans (That's Mt. Judi or Mt. Ararat same thing) and that some people carry of pieces of the bitumen which they take away and use chiefly as amulets for the averting of mischiefs or evil spirits. 

What a nice story. Ok so bad enough you quote an occult high priest of satanism basically but you then apply his magic amulet lore? Way to go Joe! You really screwed that one up because the Bible says you are wrong.  

Again this is just ridiculous! Has Tmothy actually read Josephus? It seem the answer is no. Did he even read or understand the quote that is on his slide? He certainty did not read the whole thing in the video! He does not even cite it correctly!  It's not chapter 3 verses 5 and 6! It's Book 1, Chpater 3, SECTIONS 5 and 6.  Those are long paragraphs. Let me cite them for you. All of the quotes will come from Gutenberg.

First section 5.

5. When God gave the signal, and it began to rain, the water poured down forty entire days, till it became fifteen cubits higher than the earth; which was the reason why there was no greater number preserved, since they had no place to fly to. When the rain ceased, the water did but just begin to abate after one hundred and fifty days, [that is, on the seventeenth day of the seventh month,] it then ceasing to subside for a little while. After this, the ark rested on the top of a certain mountain in Armenia; which, when Noah understood, he opened it; and seeing a small piece of land about it, he continued quiet, and conceived some cheerful hopes of deliverance. But a few days afterward, when the water was decreased to a greater degree, he sent out a raven, as desirous to learn whether any other part of the earth were left dry by the water, and whether he might go out of the ark with safety; but the raven, finding all the land still overflowed, returned to Noah again. And after seven days he sent out a dove, to know the state of the ground; which came back to him covered with mud, and bringing an olive branch: hereby Noah learned that the earth was become clear of the flood. So after he had staid seven more days, he sent the living creatures out of the ark; and both he and his family went out, when he also sacrificed to God, and feasted with his companions. However, the Armenians call this place, [GREEK] The Place of Descent; for the ark being saved in that place, its remains are shown there by the inhabitants to this day.

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2848/2848-h/2848-h.htm#link2HCH0003

That is Josephus' very own testimony about Noah's ark and the flood. It is after this that he cites other barbarian historians to prove that the flood is attested to by the whole world! This intent is shown clearly in sections 6 and 9.

6. Now all the writers of barbarian histories make mention of this flood, and of this ark; among whom is Berosus the Chaldean. For when he is describing the circumstances of the flood, he goes on thus: "It is said there is still some part of this ship in Armenia, at the mountain of the Cordyaeans; and that some people carry off pieces of the bitumen, which they take away, and use chiefly as amulets for the averting of mischiefs." Hieronymus the Egyptian also, who wrote the Phoenician Antiquities, and Mnaseas, and a great many more, make mention of the same. Nay, Nicolaus of Damascus, in his ninety-sixth book, hath a particular relation about them; where he speaks thus: "There is a great mountain in Armenia, over Minyas, called Baris, upon which it is reported that many who fled at the time of the Deluge were saved; and that one who was carried in an ark came on shore upon the top of it; and that the remains of the timber were a great while preserved. This might be the man about whom Moses the legislator of the Jews wrote." 

9. Now when Noah had lived three hundred and fifty years after the Flood, and that all that time happily, he died, having lived the number of nine hundred and fifty years. But let no one, upon comparing the lives of the ancients with our lives, and with the few years which we now live, think that what we have said of them is false; or make the shortness of our lives at present an argument, that neither did they attain to so long a duration of life, for those ancients were beloved of God, and [lately] made by God himself; and because their food was then fitter for the prolongation of life, might well live so great a number of years: and besides, God afforded them a longer time of life on account of their virtue, and the good use they made of it in astronomical and geometrical discoveries, which would not have afforded the time of foretelling [the periods of the stars] unless they had lived six hundred years; for the great year is completed in that interval. Now I have for witnesses to what I have said, all those that have written Antiquities, both among the Greeks and barbarians; for even Manetho, who wrote the Egyptian History, and Berosus, who collected the Chaldean Monuments, and Mochus, and Hestieus, and, besides these, Hieronymus the Egyptian, and those who composed the Phoenician History, agree to what I here say: Hesiod also, and Hecatseus, Hellanicus, and Acusilaus; and, besides these, Ephorus and Nicolaus relate that the ancients lived a thousand years. But as to these matters, let every one look upon them as he thinks fit.

Josephus is not quoting Berosus as if he is telling the truth in all things.  In fact he cites several authors and his intent is to show that the story of Noah is universally attested to! But does Tim tell us that? NO!! Tim's intent is to malign Josephus as he does elsewhere in the Psalm 83 war videos for instance. Josephus makes one more reference to Noah's ark in the last book of the Antiquities. From Book 20 chapter 2, section 2:

2. But when Monobazus was grown old, and saw that he had but a little time to live, he had a mind to come to the sight of his son before he died. So he sent for him, and embraced him after the most affectionate manner, and bestowed on him the country called Carra; it was a soil that bare amomum in great plenty: there are also in it the remains of that ark, wherein it is related that Noah escaped the deluge, and where they are still shown to such as are desirous to see them.

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2848/2848-h/2848-h.htm#link202HCH0002

Carra is today known as Harran, Turkey. Josephus and all of tradition is very clear that the ark landed in Turkey! As the Bible says the mountains of Ararat.  Not Mt. Everest.  There are NO traditions of Noah in Nepal.  That is very significant and Tim ignores that except to dismiss it with his Nephilim doctrine.

This article has run on long enough so it is time to end. I am sorry I cannot deal with all the lies in this video but what I have written is enough. I do have one more thing to write about. Did you ever wonder what color Noah was?  Tim knows!

https://youtu.be/jLNDoWunIsk

1:51 Now this is a quick, brief side note. Before completely diving in notice we use a photo of an albino for Noah. That's not a white dude, he's albino. Now why would we do this?  See Noah was not white but a milky white similar to that skin tone of the Nephilim with blue glowing eyes according to the Book of Enoch and Genesis Apocryphon. Noah's father Lamech was concerned by the appearance of his son because he looked smilier to a Nephilim. Now he was no Nephilim. There is no tie there and that's all proven out very well.  Lamech goes to Methuselah who then finds Enoch in the Garden of Eden in this same place the same land we've covered, Parvaim is the language used in Genesis Apocryphon or Sefar, Sefarvaim same word in Hebrew. Known as Havilah in Genesis 2. This is why we depict Noah as an albino. 

Now don't go and look up the vision challenges and other health issues of albinos and say "oh that means Noah had..." no. Those are impertinent. Noah was not that type of albino. He was special because through him all races would be retained and we believe this is how. This is why we see overwhelming evidence from history that Ham, at least his peoples, were black. Shem was dark skinned or medium brown or red. And we will discuss that in the next video. And Japheth was white generally if nothing else. Many try to pull that together but ignore Noah himself may have actually been the one carrying all the genes of what we call races today. Though there is actually only one race. It's called the human race and that's all we actually have.  Everything else is manufactured.

Blue glowing eyes? Are you telling me that Noah was a Fremen? Was he the Kwisatz Haderach?

On a serious note, if this can be called serious, Tim's picture of Noah does not even match the description in the Book of Enoch.

CHAP. 106.—And after some days, my son Methuselah took a wife for his son Lamech, and she became pregnant by him, and gave birth to a son. 

2. His body was white as snow and red as the bloom of a rose, and the hair of his head was white as wool, and his eyes beautiful; and when he opened his eyes, they illuminated the whole house like the sun, and the whole house became exceedingly light. 

3. And as he was taken from the hand of the midwife, he opened his mouth, and conversed with the Lord of justice. 

4. And his father Lamech was afraid of him, and fled, and came to his father Methuselah.  

5. And he said to him: “I have begotten a singular son, unlike a man, but similar to the children of the angels of heaven, and his creation is different, and not like ours, and his eyes are like the feet [i.e. rays] of the sun, his face glorious. 

6. And it seems to me he is not from me, but from the angels; and I fear that wonderful things will happen in his days over the earth. 

7. And now, my father, I am here petitioning and asking of thee that thou shouldst go to Enoch, our father, and hear of him the truth, for he has his dwelling-place with the angels.” 

8. And when Methuselah had heard the words of his son, he came to me, at the ends of the earth, for he had heard that I was there, and cried aloud, and I heard his voice and came to him. And I said to him: “Behold, here I am, my son, because thou hast come to me.” 

9. And he answered and said to me: “I have come to thee concerning a great thing, and concerning a disturbing vision it is that I have approached. 

10. And now, my father, hear me, for there has been born to my son Lamech a son, whose similarity and kind is not like the kind of men; his color is whiter than snow, and redder than the bloom of a rose, and the hair of his head is whiter than white wool, and his eyes like the feet [i.e. rays] of the sun; and he opened his eyes, and they illuminated the whole house. 

11. And when he was taken from the hands of the midwife, he opened his mouth, and blessed the Lord of heaven. 

12. And his father Lamech was afraid, and fled to me, and did not believe that he was from him, but that his similarity was from the angels of heaven; and behold I have come to thee that thou shouldst teach me justice [i.e. the truth].” 

https://www.holybooks.com/wp-content/uploads/The-book-of-Enoch.pdf

According to Enoch the eyes of Noah are not blue and glowing like a spice eater but bright like the rays of the sun. The R.H. Charles translation even says his hair was long. Tim can't even get that right!