Wednesday, February 8, 2023

The God Culture: Does Timothy Jay Schwab Have a Worker's Visa?

Does Timothy Jay Schwab have a worker's visa which would allow him to sell his books online in the Philippines? Apparently he needs one to sell books via Shopee and through his website Ophir Institute. Take the case of vlogger Penelope Pop.

https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1391613/vlogger-penelope-pop-faces-deportation-over-immigration-rules-breach

Vlogger and social media influencer “Penelope Pop” is facing a deportation case for allegedly performing “gainful activity” without the necessary permit and visa.

In a charge sheet made public on Wednesday, Special Prosecutor Emmanuel Anthony Vera Jr. accused the internet celebrity of engaging in the online retail trade of lifestyle products such as notebooks, bags, and toiletries via www.theeveryday.ph without the required alien employment permit. Vera said Wang holds a special investor resident visa.

Penelope Pop is also known as Winnie Wong while her real name is Wang Yun-I/Yun-I Wang.

According to Vera, Wang’s involvement in the online retail business is a violation of the Commonwealth Act or the Philippine Immigration Act, which controls and regulates the immigration of foreign nationals in the country.

Bureau of Immigration (BI) Deputy Commissioner Tobias Javier has also ordered the inclusion of Wang in the immigration watchlist with remarks “Charged: engaging in gainful activity without a visa/permit.”

Foreigners cannot be involved in online retail without the necessary "alien employment permit." Does Tim have such a permit that would allow him to offer his books at a discount rate through his website Ophir Institute and Shopee?



This issue is actually a little complicated. First of all Tim is selling books he has written through his website Ophir Institute. Second of all we know that it is HIS website and business because he admits in his biography that he and his wife founded the Ophir Institute together. 


https://www.thegodculture.com/our-founder

Timothy Jay Schwab, with his Filipina wife Anna, is the author of the books The Search for King Solomon's Treasure: The Lost Isles of Gold and the Garden of Eden, Instruction Edition: The Search for King Solomon's Treasure, and Ophir Philippines Coffee Table Book, all supported by a 300-page SOURCEBOOK of very credible sources no one can disprove. They have founded the Ophir Institute in the Philippines to restore this knowledge. 

That information is not to be found on the Ophir Institute's "about" page. According to that page Tim and Anna are only partnering with the Ophir Institute.

Therefore, the Ophir Institute has proudly partnered with author, researcher, singer, former minister, and successful publisher Timothy Schwab and his wife, Anna Zamoranos-Schwab, a Filipina, who lead a team of researchers who tackled this topic. They published their findings on YouTube first with over 10 million views and now, even deeper research is available in book and eBook form. As of recent, this list of publishings includes, The Search for King Solomon's Treasure, INSTRUCTIONAL EDITION: The Search for King Solomon's Treasure, Ophir Philippines Coffee Table Book, and The Book of Jubilees: The Torah Calendar. 

Though we are a group, these authors' writings largely resemble the core of our mission to educate Filipinos about our lost history.

https://www.ophirinstitute.com/bio

Normally one would call this a lie. But in this instance it is actually a shrewd business move. Now Tim is only tangentially connected to the Ophir Institute as a partner. They are using his writings as their core mission and they are selling those same writings. He and his wife Anna are merely a disinterested third party. Of course one will have to ignore that little bit about he and his wife founding the Ophir Institute which is a part of the biography he has posted across several pages including Amazon.

Part of the shrewdness of this move is Anna using the surname Schwab in both of those biographies. At the bottom of each page we read the following:

© 2020 by Ophir Institute. DTI Registered as Ophir Publishing.

Searching for that registration we find this:

https://bnrs.dti.gov.ph/search?keyword=ophir+publishing&criteria=exact&sort_by=business_name&sort_order=asc

The Ophir Institute is registered as Ophir Publishing and is owned by one Anna Rose Gacayan Zamoranos. This person is not a Schwab. Officially there is no connection to Timothy Schwab or Anna Schwab in the registration. 

However it should be noted that Ophirinsititue.com is registered in Florida, USA.

https://ph.godaddy.com/whois/results.aspx?domain=ophirinstitute.com

It is also hosted on the same server as TheGodCulture.com which is most definitely registered to Timothy Schwab from Florida, USA

Name Server: NS10.WIXDNS.NET

Why is a website which is registered to Timothy Schwab in Florida, USA registered as a business in the Philippines to a woman apparently unrelated to him?

From this we can draw two conclusions.

1. Timothy Jay Schwab does not need a worker's visa because he is not involved in any gainful activity in the Philippines via the internet because he does not own the company selling his books, Ophir publishing. Someone else does. The owner is not a Schwab and appears to have no connections to Timothy though her name is suspiciously similar to the name of the divorcee he married. 

2. Because the owner of Ophir Publishing is not a Schwab it cannot be said with any certainty that Tim, as the brains behind both the God Culture and the Ophir Institute and the author of several books being sold by the Ophir Institute, is conspiring with his wife to circumvent Philippine law on a technicality so he can sell his books without having to procure the proper visa.

Of course if both of those conclusions are true then we must also conclude that Tim is not making any money from selling his books online in the Philippines. Is that a realistic conclusion? More importantly why is there all this chicanery as regards who owns what? We see have seen this same nonsense in his trademark registrations where ALL of his God Culture related materials are registered to an address in Florida.

https://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2021/08/the-god-culture-past-and-future-projects.html

But Tim has not lived in Florida since at least 2019. So, why is he registering everything to Angie Myers in Boca Raton, Florida? Who is this lady? She is Tim's former employee. See the link under the picture for more information. 

I suppose it all makes sense though. Tim is dishonest in his books and videos telling flat out lies about Philippine history, ancient maps, the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Bible Canon, and the divinity of the Holy Spirit among so many other things. It would only be consistent for Timothy Jay Schwab of The God Culture to not be above board in his business practices.  

Thursday, February 2, 2023

The God Culture: Valid, Credible Archaeology That the Philippines is Ophir, The Garden of Eden, etc.?

Timothy Jay Schwab of The God Culture has issued a direct response to a video I made about him titled The God Culture Admits There is No Archeological Evidence for Their Claims About the Philippines. That video was based on two interviews Tim did with Zen Garcia and Jon Pounders. Tim was asked by both of them for archeological evidence for his claims and he was unable to offer any. In this rebuttal video Tim tells us exactly what kind of archaeology we are to look for in order to locate Ophir, the land of gold. 

Philippines Valid, Credible Archeology: Isle of Gold and Garden of Eden. Solomon's Gold Series 16H

Tim begins this video by stating I falsely claimed he said there was no archaeology to prove his claims about the Philippines being Ophir. 

0:55 Isn't there archeology that proves the Philippines is ophir? Well, we certainly have seen some somewhere, gee, I don't know, uh, well, we've seen it in Solomon's Gold Series. Oh how about that. Yet again we were falsely accused of saying something in an interview that while we didn't say.

Now it is perfectly true that in neither of the interviews he gave did Tim say the exact words, "There is no archaeology to prove my claims." But neither did he offer archaeological proof for his claims when asked by the hosts to provide it. Tim is also on record in his book The Search for King Solomon's Treasure, and in this new video as we shall see, claiming there is no archaeology in the Philippines to prove it is Ophir. 


The Search for King Solomon's Treasure pgs. 128-129

Many seek this architecture in demand to prove this narrative and they are stuck in a false paradigm. There is none to be expected nor has any other nation on earth produced such nor will they.

Ancient Ophir is never described as having temples at all whether alone ones of gold, it is never recored to have great infrastructure in any sense just a mega-abundance of resources. The humble lifestyle of the Filipino even fits the oath of a Rechabite as Farrisol said.
What is meant by archaeology? A number of things including but not limited to artifacts such as inscriptions, pottery, and ruins. 
Archaeology or archeology is the study of human activity through the recovery and analysis of material culture. The archaeological record consists of artifactsarchitecturebiofacts or ecofacts, sites, and cultural landscapes.

However, it appears that Tim is hyper-focused on the ruins of cities both in his book and in this video.
2:50 Well, this is the real question that numerous academics and scholars just dismiss, uh, this because well they require, and this is typical in such disciplines, they require us to find a city with a street sign that says Ophir of course and if you don't you can't prove it's Ophir right? I mean talk about ignorance.
What's ignorant is everything about what Tim says. Who exactly is looking for a city with a street sign that says "Ophir?" Sure, that's hyperbole on Tim's part, hopefully, but there is more to archaeology than the ruins of ancient cities. Tim is purposely limiting himself here knowing full well there are no ruins of ancient cites in the Philippines on the level of Angkor Wat, Chichen Itza, Persepolis, or Nineveh. 

According to Tim this kind of evidence, the ruins of ancient cities, is not to be found in the Philippines or anywhere else Ophir might be because the Bible, when describing Ophir, never mentions cities or architecture. 

7:12 How many times does any biblical or historical reference ever define Ophir as having great architecture or any architecture for that matter at all? Is architecture even a note or a side note in any of these narratives? Yes, that is what they mean when they say archeology typically by the way. They want ancient civilizations. They ignore the archeology of gold but just want civilizations of who? Of Cain. The answer is zilch, nada. Here they are on screen all of the references that say there's great architecture in Ophir and the Garden of Eden 

This is a strawman argument. There is actually NO description of the land of Ophir or its inhabitants whatsoever! Does that mean there are no people in Ophir? Following Tim's logic that would be the case. The Bible does not even call Ophir, or any land for that matter, the land of gold.  All we get is a list of resources brought back from Ophir and these same resources can be found in India as even Tim admits.

The only other coherent claim as far as resources are concerned is India yet it’s own history says it had a source of ancient gold and silver, isles to the East thus none of these make any sense except the Philippines. 

 Every resource of Solomon tests as native to the Philippines and all other claims fail in this chapter except India whose claim already failed the test of it’s own history. 

Solomon's Treasure, pgs. 110 and 115

Is Tim unaware that India is said to be loaded with gold? Herodotus in book 3 sections 102-105 relates how the Indians would gather the gold in their country. India's source of gold was itself. Even Josephus says Ophir is part of India.
4. Moreover the King built many ships in the Egyptian bay of the Red Sea; in a certain place called Ezion-geber. It is now called Berenice; and is not far from the city Eloth. This countrey belonged formerly to the Jews; and became useful for shipping, from the donations of Hiram King of Tyre. For he sent a sufficient number of men thither for pilots, and such as were skilfull in navigation: to whom Solomon gave this command, that they should go along with his own stewards to the land that was of old called Ophir, but now the Aurea Chersonesus: which belongs to India: to fetch him gold. And when they had gathered four hundred talents together, they returned to the King again.

According to Timothy Jay Schwab the only true measure, for finding Ophir, the land of gold, is...gold!

6:21 I mean think about it if you had never heard of this and someone asked you how do you find the land of gold would not your first answer be gold itself first in history in archeology etc.? Well of course it would.

27:30 The question for the land of gold is who has the most gold in the ground now.

38:09 But we don't need this. We don't need it to show on mining gold reports for production. The report that matters is untapped gold in the ground now.

41:32 I mean you don't get more valid than Antonio Pigafetta, uh, and he's really he's the only eyewitness uh to what the Philippines was when the Spanish came. Uh, he came with Magellan and he was his historian and he wrote this stuff so, uh, this is fact folks. In the island belonging to the king who came to the ship, this is the king of Butuan, there are mines of gold which they find in pieces as big as a walnut or an egg, a chicken's egg, a nugget of gold that's pretty big by seeking in the ground. That's not talking about massive equipment to mine gold deep which the Philippines didn't have and shouldn't have yet it was the land of gold. How is that? Because the gold was far easier to get to it was sitting on the ground it was close to the surface and it was in the shallows of the streams and rivers. Seeking in the ground does not require massive mining equipment so to look for it is rather ridiculous is it not? These are alluvial deposits that is the key here and this is huge valid credible archeology. What?  

Yes this is archeology of gold by the king of Butuan who handed it to Magellan. There you go. As a gift. That's what this is. So yes there is valid archeology of the right kind of archeology in the Philippines indeed.

There you have it. What should we be looking for when it comes to finding Ophir? According to Timothy Jay Schwab the ONLY valid archaeology of the right kind to find the land of Ophir is to look for the amount of gold currently sitting under the ground. Is he so bereft of sense as to not realize he is talking about GEOLOGY and not archaeology? How exactly does the amount of gold currently sitting UNDER THE GROUND indicate that said land is Ophir? Tim never says.

The Bible records TONS of gold being brought to Jerusalem from Ophir. That indicates there would not be much left in the ground. The fact that there is so much gold currently untapped in the Philippines ought to give Tim pause. So should the fact that Pigafetta records natives told him that they did not have the iron to dig out the gold!

They showed me certain valleys, making signs that there was more gold there than hairs on the head, but that as they had not iron to dig it out, it required great labour to acquire it, and which they did not choose to undergo

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_First_Voyage_Round_the_World/Pigafetta%27s_Account_of_Magellan%27s_Voyage

If they did not have the iron to dig out the gold in 1521 why should we think they had that technology during the time of Solomon? Tim's solution is that they did not and all the gold brought back from the Philippines to Israel was found by panning streams and picking it up off the ground! Alluvial deposits are what Tim claims is key and is the only valid archaeology. 

These are alluvial deposits that is the key here and this is huge valid credible archeology. 

Are we really to believe that BILLIONS of dollars, TONS of gold, was panned from rivers or picked up from the ground and not MINED from within the earth? It is not believable in the slightest. Where are the ancient gold mines in the Philippines? Tim cannot produce them. Nor can he point to any history of gold mining in the Philippines which would produce the vast quantities brought back from Ophir because, as he so conveniently notes, alluvial mining does not leave an archeological trace!

21:12 Should we really have to explain this to academia and scholars? I mean evidently we do but we shouldn't have to. Think. A technique requiring little capital investment in equipment and no specialist technology but unfortunately leaving, what's that word, NO not even a little, none, discernible archaeological signature so why are you looking for something that can't even be there? Wow. We all know what none means right?

There you have it! According to TIM there is NO ARCHEOLOGICAL evidence that ancient Filipinos were mining gold, let alone shipping it to Israel, and thus NO ARCHEOLOGICAL evidence for his claims that the Philippines is Ophir. His only archeological proof offers no archeological proof! Outstanding. 

It's not as if there isn't an abundance of archeological evidence which tells us about the ancient Philippines. Tim simply chooses to ignore it all and points only to gold because no archeological find will back up his claims. Are we really to believe that there was an ancient Hebrew civilization in the Philippines and no remains were left behind? Are we really to believe that the Biblical kingdom of Sheba was in the Philippines and there is not a trace of it to be found? Are we really supposed to believe that the Philippines engaged in trade with Greece and Israel for a thousand years by sailing around Africa and not a single witness to that trade route remains? According to Tim we are and that is utter folly. More than that it is madness and stupidity.  What physical evidence exists that proves there was any great kingdom in the Philippines which united all these islands be it Ophir or Tarshish? There is none. Tim can produce NONE except to say "look at the gold." 

That is not archaeology that is GEOLOGY!!  The difference is vast. Geology is all about rocks and minerals. Archaeology is all about the remains of civilizations. It is archaeology and not geology that is wanting in Tim's scheme. Therefore Timothy Jay Schwab is admitting that there is no archeological evidence the Philippines is Ophir when he points to gold under the ground as valid and credible archaeology to back up his claims.

Saturday, January 7, 2023

The God Culture: Did the Ancient Greeks Circumnavigate Africa to Trade With the Philippines?

One of the most outrageous and ridiculous claims made by Timothy Jay Schwab of The God Culture is that there was a regular and robust trade between the Philippines with Greece and Israel via circumnavigating Africa from the time of David to just after the time Jesus Christ was born. When asked for proof of this claim Tim was unable to give any yet he still included it in his book The Search For Solomon's Treasure. Fast forward two years and now Tim has produced a 6 part video series offering "proof" that ancient mariners did indeed circumnavigate Africa. Will this information be incorporated into any future editions of his book?

Let's take a look at all six videos and see if Tim accomplishes the impossible and proves that ancient Greeks, Israelites, and Filipinos were engaged in a network of trade by circumnavigating Africa.

The first video is evidence from the Bible. 

Did The Ancients Sail Around Africa? Bible Evidence. Solomon's Gold Series 16A

If you are expecting Tim to produce a Bible passage describing a journey around Africa you will be forgiven for being mistaken. This video presumes two things. First of all it presumes that the Biblical location of Tarshish is the Philippines. Tim thinks he has proven this but he has not and I have a three part series of articles breaking down his alleged proofs which do not add up. See parts 12, and 3 for detailed information refuting that claim. Everything the Bible says indicates Tarshish must have been located in the Mediterranean basin. The existence of ancient tin ingots dating to the 13th-12th centuries BC, tin was said to have been brought back from Tarshish, being found in Israel which can be traced to Britain and not the Philippines is just one proof among many that Tarshish is not the Philippines.

The second thing this video presumes is that there was a robust trade between Israel and the Philippines (Tarshish) by the long way around Africa. Tim begins by affirming the conclusion before he has even proven it! His reasoning is that the Philippines is Tarshish, the port on the Red Sea at Eziongeber was busted, therefore the only way to Tarshish/Philippines by ship was to circumnavigate Africa.

2:52 This first video will set foundations specifically regarding biblical accounts where the Bible says ancients circumnavigated, they sailed around Africa as fact. The Bible is fact you know. If you don't believe that, well, don't call yourself a Bible scholar, uh, you know or a believer of the Bible. And yes it most definitely does no doubt say that. Uh, that will be our foundation.

Tim will go on to admit that the Bible does not specifically say that anyone circumnavigated Africa. His claim is based wholly on inference and not direct evidence. 
17:58 Does the Bible come out and say it? You know the Bible doesn't come out and say a lot of things but when you see the beginning of the narrative and the end of the narrative it's obvious what happened.
Based on the fact that the Red Sea port was destroyed Tim infers that the only way to Tarshish was by circumnavigating Africa.
30:23 Jonah tells us the ships of Tarshish from the land of Tarshish, not the ones from Israel, some get confused there, the original ones, the land itself in the Far East were still running. And guess what? They were circumnavigating Africa which his narrative is extremely clear leaving no room for anything else. Hmm. This is interesting. And again Tarshish was Greek and his descendants would be of Greek descent whether they lived in Greece or not.

In part three we restore Jonah's actual Journey according to the Bible account which almost every scholar and even pastor at that level has wrong. They just teach it wrong because they don't know and they're taught inaccurate geography. They just don't know what they're talking about.
First, they forgot the Red Sea port was toast and that's a huge forget. It's gone and all the ships as well so the only option was to circumnavigate Africa into the Atlantic into the Mediterranean and then Jonah says, this is history and geography right there in the Bible, says the ships going to Tarshish were right there in Joppa Israel. That's on the coast of Israel on the Mediterranean not on the Red Sea. Somehow they got around there but Jonah says the ship was in 800 BC so it was. And how exactly can we miss nor dismiss that? Willing ignorance of course. 
So, here we have history, yes history, that in 800 BC the ships of Tarshish, the Greek ships yes from the Greek colony over in the Philippines, were able to show up in Joppa Israel on the Mediterranean. How about that? There was no Suez Canal yet and the Red Sea port was out of commission. They circumnavigated Africa it was the only option and it's documented right here in 800 BC.

The Greek colony in the Philippines?? Don't expect to hear any more about that in this video or in any other video. Suffice to say there is no evidence of an Ancient Greek presence in the Philippines. Some armor alleged to be Ancient Greek was found in Mindanao but that claim does not hold up. I have written about that elsewhere.


One of Tim's main sources for all his claims about the Philippines being Ophir is the Periplus of the Erythean Sea which details ports of call and shipping routes going towards India. Is there such a source for the southern route around Africa? Of course not and Tim is at least honest enough to admit that but hardheaded enough to say "we don't need it" and asking for such a thing is illiterate.
38:39 Now, do we have the details where it says we went to this coordinate and we passed this coordinate and we passed that coordinate? Well, no we don't but we don't need it. This is ancient history folks. I mean it is absolutely illiterate for Academia to place such constraints on ancient history. Yes, today we'd have CCTV footage, right? Uh, we have lots of ways that we could prove things out and, uh, you know there maybe even GPS data, uh, you know. We have lots of ways we didn't have any of that back then so to try to take that Paradigm and put it on these ancient factual historic accounts is stupidity.
According to Tim the Periplus of the Erythean is a great resource about the ancient world but asking for the same thing concerning the circumnavigating of Africa, a guide to ports of call and trade routes, is stupid and illiterate and he does not need it. All he needs is the Bible.
40:31 And also let us not forget circumnavigating Africa, again, is no impediment to the Bible paradigm whatsoever. It's only Academia that made up such a thinking, right? I mean it's, you talk about scoffing. The very nonsensical thought that "well man couldn't circumnavigate Africa."
Which academics say ancient sailors could absolutely NOT circumnavigate Africa? Tim cites no one to back up this claim. It's just another opportunity for him to dump on scholars while puffing up himself. Tim does not cite a single academic or scholar in any of these videos yet he rails on them as if he knows what their opinions are. This is the height of hubris and ignorance. Once again magazine publisher and Christian rock singer Timothy Jay Schwab knows more than those who have devoted their lives to studying the ancient world. This schtick is getting old.

This so-called Biblical evidence is really of no weight here because it is reliant on Tim's faulty interpretation of the location of Tarshish being the Philippines. It also assumes the conclusion without actually proving it. What we are looking for here is proof of a robust and regular trade route between the Philippines and Greece and Israel. If it existed then there should be evidence of it and not just scraps found here and there in the Bible or elsewhere which need to be glued together to see the whole picture. It is simply inconceivable that the Greeks had trade route maps of India and none of Africa if they did indeed circumnavigate Africa. Asking for that kind of evidence is not illiterate seeing as such evidence exists for the trade routes to India. 

The second video deals mostly with the writings of Herodotus and Strabo which contain the limit of our knowledge concerning ancient trips around Africa.

Did The Ancient Greeks Sail Around Africa? To Ophir, Philippines? Solomon's Gold Series 16B 

Right off the bat Tim lowers the bar. Now instead of seeking to prove that ancient mariners sailed around Africa and engaged in a robust trade with the Philippines Tim is only seeking to prove whether circumnavigating Africa was POSSIBLE.

0:55 Did the ancient Greeks and others circumnavigate sail around the continent of Africa from the Mediterranean Sea into the Atlantic and Around the Horn of Africa all the way into the Indian Ocean? Was that possible?

But that is not the question. Contrary to what Tim says the testimony of Herodotus that the Phoenicians circumnavigated Africa is not contested by modern academics. However, while Herodotus says he did not believe the story Tim says that Herodotus only did not believe the part concerning the sun and that the story's inclusion is proof that Herodotus believed the story was true in toto. 

14:56 "There they said what some may believe though I do not." What doesn't he believe? Well, he's about to tell you but he didn't say he didn't believe the rest of what he said, did he? No that is illiterate to read it that way. "That in sailing around Libya they had the sun on their right hand." Well where were they? Well, they're down at the tip of Africa something he knows nothing about.

Hold the phone! If there was regular commerce between Greece and the Philippines by circumnavigating Africa then why would Herodotus know NOTHING about the tip of South Africa or that the sun changes positions when one sails around it? By the time he is writing these should be common facts if the trade route between Greece and the Philippines actually existed. This testimony undercuts Tim's claims and he does not even realize it. Herodotus did not just disbelieve what the Phoenicians said about the sun, he did not believe their journey was even possible because the Greeks did not believe the Indian and Atlantic Oceans merged! This is clearly seen in Ptolemy's world map which shows a landlocked Indian Ocean. 

Tim goes on to say that Herodotus would not have included this story if it were not actual history. 

23:08 Herodotus would not have included this in his history which is massive and very extensive, uh, if it wasn't history.
Has Tim even read Herodotus? Are there really fox-sized ants in India which mine gold? 
Here, in this desert, there live amid the sand great ants, in size somewhat less than dogs, but bigger than foxes. The Persian king has a number of them, which have been caught by the hunters in the land whereof we are speaking. Those ants make their dwellings under ground, and like the Greek ants, which they very much resemble in shape, throw up sand heaps as they burrow. Now the sand which they throw up is full of gold.
https://www.livius.org/sources/content/herodotus/the-gold-digging-ants/
The point is not everything Herodotus includes in his History is actually true or was believed by him to be true. In fact there are several times when he relates a story and says he does not believe it. That Tim could say something so stupid as Herodotus would not have included this story if it were not actual history or was believed by him to be true just goes to show he has not actually read Herodotus. But Tim does not actually care what Herodotus has to say because the alleged proofs from the Bible, which Herodotus ignores, are more than sufficient.
6:02 However, let's be clear Herodotus was the opposite of a Bible believer and the Bible already told us Tarshish the Greek circumnavigated Africa carrying Ophir and brothers to the Philippines. It also tells us Jonah hopped on a ship making the same Journey and circumnavigated Africa into the Indian Ocean as Tarshish is east of the Persian Gulf.
The possibility of the Phoenicians circumnavigating Africa is not debated by anyone these days. That singular journey is also not proof of a robust trade route between the Philippines and Greece and Israel. That is what needs proving. It cannot be proved and that is why Tim has lowered the bar to proving the trip was merely possible. Tim even admits that Herodotus knew nothing of the tip of South Africa which is patently ludicrous if there was a robust trade route that way concerning Greece. 

Tim's second witness is Strabo but Strabo's testimony proves beyond a doubt that if circumnavigating Africa  happened at all it was a rare event. Strabo tells us about Eudoxus who found part of a Phoenician ship in Ethiopia.
38:39 From this Eudoxus drew the conclusion that it was possible to circumnavigate Libya which is Africa, right? Uh, and that's what matters here.
He drew the conclusion that the circumnavigating Africa was possible? If there was robust trade between the Philippines and Greece and Israel by sailing around Africa then the route would be well known and there would be concrete proof of its existence of which Eudoxus would have been well aware. Remarkably in his quest to prove that Greeks were sailing around Africa to the Philippines Tim only gives his audience hints the Greeks thought doing so was POSSIBLE but was actually done by others long before them not that they did so on a regular basis. 

This video ends with an appeal to Sinbad the Sailor. 
46:03 Oh, Sinbad the famous sailor was in the Philippines likely. Who would have known?
Indeed who would have known? Sinbad the Sailor never existed! He is a made up figure in the 1,001 Arabian Nights. Appealing to fictional characters is part of Tim's proof that ancient mariners were circumnavigating Africa on a regular basis to trade with the Philippines. How ludicrous is that?

It's not surprising that in this second video Tim lowered the bar to only proving the POSSIBILITY that ancient mariners circumnavigated Africa. The fact is none of the stories he cites, including that of Herodotus, can actually be proven to have ever taken place.

Up to today the historicity of none of these reported circumnavigations has ever been proved, and it probably never willIf they took place they certainly did not result in any understanding about the extent and course of Africa's coasts. None of these sailors left a route description such as the (sketchy) one of Hanno. Of the circumnavigation by Necho's Phoenicians we only know what Herodotus tells us (4.42): that the Phoenicians entered the ocean from the Red Sea, put in every autumn on the African coast to sow and harvest, reached the Pillars of Hercules in the third year and, what Herodotus does not believe, that they had the sun on their right—in the north—when they sailed around the southern end of Africa. The reason why Herodotus could not accept this statement about the position of the sun at midday was not because he thought it impossible that the sun could ever be seen in the north anywhere in the world. In Herodotus' time the changes in the position of the sun when one travelled south were well known. Herodotus had visited Elephantine (2.29) near the tropic of Cancer, where the sun is almost overhead during the summer solstice and south of which the shadows sometimes fall 'the wrong way'. His disbelief of the Phoenicians' statement is therefore not a result of primitive incredulity, but stems from the fact that he, like Strabo, could not believe that Africa stretched over the equator into the southern hemisphere.

https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/AJA03031896_926

Trotting out the same old stories everyone knows about alleged circumnavigations of Africa does not prove they happened nor does anything in this video prove that a robust trade via Africa between Greece and the Philippines existed. Quite frankly this video is a total failure.

Having given all the extant historical testimony to ancient voyages circumnavigating Africa and failing to prove there was a robust trade between the Philippines and Greece and Israel by circumnavigating Africa Tim moves on in the next two videos to discussing Greek and Roman maps.

The 1st Century Mapping Mindset. Greece to Ophir, Philippines? Solomon's Gold Series 16C

I have written elsewhere at length about these maps showing how Tim misuses them and does not understand them rightly. There is absolutely nothing new here but there are a few things Tim says which pertain to the alleged circumnavigation of Africa by the Greeks to trade with the Philippines which must be noted.

36:55 Now we have the end point and we have the full mapping. Uh, can we not draw the lines ourselves or did they have to do that for us too to show that they circumnavigated Africa in order to get from Greece to the Philippines? Duh. I mean do you really need to do that?
52:44 So Mela's talking about a route that the Greeks navigated. Yes, circumnavigating Africa for certain. That's what this is showing. This map documents that the Greeks circumnavigated Africa. Period. Even if you don't agree that those islands are the Philippines, which you really can't disagree with it, but even if you do you still have to conclude that the Greeks circumnavigated Africa. Done. I mean there wasn't even a canal built until 200 BC. Hello!? They were running this route from 800 to 150 BC. So duh. Now imagine that uh the 43 A.D mapping covers that whole era in fact. Now, that's evidence and it's indisputable evidence and again it proves that they circumnavigated Africa indeed successfully they brought back gold from Chryse. 

The map in question which Tim claims proves the Greeks circumnavigated Africa is that of Pomponius Mela. Notice how all of Sub-Saharan Africa is missing yet according to Tim this proves the Greeks were circumnavigating Africa. Apparently they forgot to make notes about the southern part of Africa.

What is of particular interest here is that Tim claims the Greeks "were running this route from 800 to 150 BC." That is an astounding claim seeing as there is abosolutley no evidence such is the case. Not in maps, not in histories, not in anything. Tim's reason for this lack of evidence is a simple ad hoc solution. The route around Africa was super-duper top secret and the Greeks told no one about it. 

29:45 The Greeks knew, uh, they knew how to sail to Chryse Ophir. They knew exactly where it was but why would the Greeks share their location for their land of gold so publicly while they're still going there? Hmm?? Think about that. The answer is easy. They wouldn't broadcast that. Oh, hello world here's where we go to get our gold. Oh, wait a minute you're all going there too? Oh I, I didn't mean for you to go I was just letting you know because I didn't think anybody would follow the route. Duh!

Except in the second video Tim gave testimony that this route was taken by the Phoenicians among others. But even if this were the case, that the Greeks refused to share their top secret trade route, surely there would be physical evidence that this route took place. There would be Ancient Greek artifacts up and down the West African coast. There might even be a reference to the route in a document kept hidden  which has been preserved to our times much like the Dead Sea Scrolls. 

Tim claimed in the first video that Philippine (Tarshish) ships were regularly sailing around Africa to Israel and Greece so surely there would be evidence of Philippine artifacts in West Africa as well as North Africa, Greece and Israel. And with the route being sailed by Filipinos, Greeks, and Phoenicians surely someone wrote it down or made note of it somewhere. After all this is 700 years of alleged history according to Tim. It would be rather unusual that there would be no evidence at all of its existence after 700 years and Tim claims the route was being plied as late as 4 BC when the three Magi set sail from the Philippines to visit Jesus. But there is no such evidence of any kind that the Greeks or anyone else was circumnavigating Africa on a regular basis to trade with the Philippines for 700 years or more. It's all based on an argument from silence and from a wrong interpretation of Greek and Roman maps. 

Video E deals with maps used by Magellan and Columbus and is loaded with more of the same errors I have refuted elsewhere. Read my article, The God Culture: The Philippines is the Land Before Time, for a rebuttal of Tim's claim that the Cattigara of Ptolemy is in Samar in the Philippines and is attested so by Antonio Pigafetta as well as his interpretation of Martin Behaim's map. See my article The God Culture: Lequios and Lucoes Are Not the Same People Group for a rebuttal to his claims that Fernando Pinto was shipwrecked in the Lequois islands and gave coordinates that place it in Luzon. For a rebuttal to his ignorant remarks about Samuel Purchas read my article The God Culture: Samuel Purchas On Ophir, Tarshish, and The Philippines.  Take note that at no time has Tim ever dealt with the facts I present in those articles but he persists in his ignorance. 

All of these videos dealing with maps are more of the same nonsense showcasing Tim has no idea what he is talking about. There is nothing new here and there is certainly nothing proving that there was a robust trade between the Philippines and Greece which lasted between 800 and 150 BC and even as late as 4 BC according to Tim's claims about the Filipino Magi visiting Baby Jesus. Remember, that the Greeks circumnavigated Africa to trade with the Philippines on a regular basis for 700 years is what Tim is attempting to prove here. Yet for three videos he has gone wildly off course to discuss wholly irrelevant matters about maps which he has already addressed at length elsewhere. 

In the sixth and final video in this series Tim takes his audience back to the past once more to offer up proof that the Greeks circumnavigated Africa on a regular basis to trade with the Philippines in 800 BC. His proof consists not of history but of myth. 

Greek Oceanus World River and Rivers From Eden lead to the Philippines? Solomon's Gold Series 16F

This video is astounding in its ridiculousness. The gist of it is Tim claims the Greek myth of a river encircling the world, Oceanus, proves both that his bonkers Rivers From Eden theory is correct and that the Greeks circumnavigated Africa. He concludes this preposterous presentation with the following comments:

1:01:30 "At the edge of Oceanus Where God like Jason went." So, Jason and the Argonauts is a story that goes geographically at some point as far as the Philippines which means they circumnavigated Africa because they left from Greece and they didn't fly helicopters. Yes, the Greeks knew where it was and they traveled circumnavigating Africa to get there from very ancient times. And what it was indeed. I mean they knew. The Greeks knew where it was and what it was. Jason went to the land of gold in the Philippines where the sun rises and Oceanus ends. Boom! This ic clear.

1:13:30 Titans/Giants destroyed by the great Deluge of Oceanus when The Fountains of the great deep from within it exploded, the origin of the flood. It is just as the rivers from Eden. It's associated with a snake. You mean the Garden of Eden? Yeah that one. It's known for the White Rock or Lukas, uh, Ilocanos anyone? Maybe. Even the Atis mentioned could be very well the tribe from the Philippines likely. Ends in the land of gold and Garden of Eden Philippines firmly. From Africa goes to the Far East where Prometheus, Gadreel, stole knowledge of Good and Evil giving it to the man while that happened in the Garden of Eden. 

It all fits. It all ties and they had to circumnavigate Africa all these many times, okay? These characters, especially in the Odyssey and The Iliad, they're going there for physically in their ships even Jason and the Argonauts went to the Philippines. That's what it says.

Got it? Tim's proof that the Greeks were circumnavigating Africa is his interpretation of Greek mythology through the lens of his erroneous teaching of Biblical and Philippine history and the Book of Enoch. Jason and the Argonauts sailed to the Philippines therefore there was a robust trade between the Philippines and Greece and Israel for 800 or more years. That is ridiculous and is no proof at all. 

Tim's Rivers from Eden theory is that the world was created without an ocean and what we now know as ocean trenches are the Rivers From Eden. The flood came and buried them along with the Garden of Eden which is now situated under miles of mud beneath the Sulu Sea with Enoch and Elijah as its lone inhabitants. I have dismantled this silly theory elsewhere in my article The God Culture: The Rivers From Eden Are Not Ocean Trenches or watch my video The God Culture's Rivers From Eden Theory Proven to be False.

This video is too chock full of nonsense to deal with in-depth here and there is no need to trudge through it. The bottom line is that neither in this video nor in any of the previous 5 videos does Tim offer any evidence that there was a robust trade between the Philippines and Greece and Israel for well over 800 years by circumnavigating Africa. The only real historical proofs he offers are in video 2 and boil down to a few historical instances where the voyage was made by a few men and everyone telling the tale thought it either not believable or quite remarkable but certainly not something ordinary. But the singular journey of the Phoenicians does not equate to a robust trade between the Philippines and Greece and Israel by  circumnavigating Africa lasting over 800 years. That 800 year history of trade is what Tim needs to prove. He has failed miserably in that endeavor.

Tim offers ZERO archeological evidence for his claims but instead goes off on wild and obfuscating tangets about maps and myths. But who needs archaeology? Ignorant agitators. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52c7XnuHDLQ&lc=Ugz_krXUKIbjerTxqc94AaABAg
Rich G****n: These agitators are looking archeology evidence simply ignoramus. All videos in TGCs research are super easy to learn. Yah bless!

The God Culture: Yah Bless. 

If you are interested in the real history of the circumnavigation of Africa by ancient explorers read the following:

The Ancient Explorers, pgs 86-106

One final thing here and that is Tim's dismissal of my work. I am mentioned several times in this series. Here is one glaring instance.

47:28 If an academic wants to come at us you better do much more than ridicule because we prove your paradigm stupid on this topic many times over even in this video. When you learn how to read a map, and how to read period, then try to come at us. Go ahead. But if you haven't reviewed our position you will be muted every time. Our channel our rules. No debate in ignorance. We're not wasting our time with such. Otherwise every single enemy, especially the racist blogger who hates everything Filipino and should be in jail, though likely still will, looks like a fool here, especially his 60 plus illiterate blogs all proven stupid.
That is all a lie. Tim has not proven any of what I have written to be wrong or stupid. In fact he never deals with the issues I bring up except to dismiss me with ridicule and threaten me with jail time. He does to me exactly what he accuses his detractors of doing to him. But I say unto Timothy Jay Schwab if you want to come at me you better do much more than ridicule because I have proven your paradigm stupid on this topic many times over even in these videos.

Thursday, December 1, 2022

The God Culture: Who is Hashem?

Timothy Jay Schwab of The God Culture is a hypocrite through and through. Not just a simple hypocrite but an out and out liar. I have claimed that many times and shown several examples. Here are two more. In a recent video about the name Hashem, which the Jews use when addressing God, Tim shows us a live chat he did with a Rabbi on a Jewish website while pretending to be a Messianic Jew in order to get the Rabbi to admit to Tim's thesis. In fact he touts this on the title card!

Who Is Hashem? Not YHWH!!! The Name of God Series: Part 14

A Rabbi's written response admitting this word in Gen. 6:4 is Hashem, the title for their god!

Let's take a look at this exchange between Tim and the Rabbi.

Who Is Hashem? Not YHWH!!! The Name of God Series: Part 14

42:22 So, we gave Aish a chance to explain and in chat Rabbi Keyak responded. Now, he was fine, uh, not mean at all, not confrontational nor were we. Uh, we just asked some questions and he answered and in all fairness he did answer. Though, he usually answered in Talmudic style of course with a question. So, answer a question with a question. But we asked him about Genesis 6:4 and told him it appears Hashem is the origin of the Nephilim, the father of it. Hmm. He answers with a question of course. "Well, what exactly are you asking about the Giants?" Our question was very clear was it not? I mean you can read it there on screen. We framed it even clearer again and repeat it. To that he wanted to know what translation we were using. Okay so we told him we are using the Masoretic text not a translation and the Hebrew says the Giants were the men of Hashem though it is translated renowned in error. Now, of course that's from the KJV. He essentially agreed that's wrong, renown is wrong, asking where we got the word renown in fact and of course we told him the KJV. Uh, we gave him an out though saying well this means the Giants would have come from Hashem which cannot be true, can it? Uh, oh this is good look at his response. 

The rabbi then admits this is the word Hashem, which it is we showed you Genesis 4 is Men Of Hashem. That's what he's saying too. Uh he's not being dishonest in that at all. Uh, of course with a question, uh, "Why wouldn't the Giants come from Hashem?" Again he doesn't have a problem with that. In other words he has no issue because he doesn't believe the sons of God or Benha Elohim are angels. Now, he says they don't translate it that way which is as wrong as a Rabbi can be but no surprise and we know this we've covered this uh in many videos. Uh ,we'll show you some videos at the end where we prove this out. He distances himself from the Christian perspective of course and then we mention Enoch. Oh now he dismisses it immediately. "We did not canonize Enoch." Indeed they did not. That's true. It's not in the Pharisee Canon of Josephus which is what the modern Jewish Canon is and the Churches are following that Pharisee Canon largely in ignoring the original Bible Canon kept by the biblically ordained sons of Zadok who were exiled to Qumran, Bethabara where Yahusua was baptized, where John the Baptist the son of Zadok operated and we found their Library there which is Bible Canon. 

This Rabbi was respectful and the conversation was fine but revealing indeed and that's what we were looking for as he admits it appears that our first passage in Genesis 6:4 most certainly says the Nephilim Giants are the men of Hashem. He affirmed we're reading the Hebrew correctly there. Of course we know we are because it's direct. Hashem is the word used. The name he calls his God but he's okay with that understand that. Are you? See, we aren't. We could have pressed further but he would have figured out we probably weren't good friends. So, anyway we'll leave this at that

There is quite a lot of projection going on here. Tim says this Rabbi was not confrontational as if he was expecting him to be so. He also says he could have pressed further but he did not because the Rabbi would have figured out it was all a ruse. If the situation was reversed Tim would have immediately called the Rabbi a communist agitator and blocked him. And answering a question with a question is NOT Talmudic, it's the Socratic Method and is an invaluable part of learning to think critically something Tim does not know how to do. 

What is the Socratic Method? Developed by the Greek philosopher, Socrates, the Socratic Method is a dialogue between teacher and students, instigated by the continual probing questions of the teacher, in a concerted effort to explore the underlying beliefs that shape the students views and opinions.

https://tilt.colostate.edu/the-socratic-method/

Take a look at how Tim dishonestly presented himself in this chat. 


Aish Fan:  I am confused about something. Looking at Gen. 6:4, the giants were the 'men of renown" or men of Hashem in the Hebrew. Is this not the same God we invoke when trying to replace YHWH with Hashem? Why would we do that?

Rabb Keyak: What exactly are you asking about the giants? 

Aish Fan: It says they were the "men of renown." The word renown in Hebrew is "Hashem." I have someone telling me that I am invoking the wrong God when using Hashem. How do I answer this. 

They continue to tell me Hashem is never found in Torah as a name or title for G-d. 

We?? Tim attempts to pass himself off as a Jew! How ridiculous. Further in the conversation Tim attempts to pass himself off as a Messianic Jew!

I am Messianic....

This whole video is a ridiculous and dishonest attempt to prove that the Nephilim were men of Hashem meaning men who came from the god Hashem or Ashima. That is all bunk. The Hebrew does not say they were men of Hashem. The phrase is "ish Shem." It's two words. "Ish" meaning men and "Shem" meaning renown. 

Inspired by Tim I had a live chat with this very same Rabbi Keyak and he explained to me that the proper name Hashem is not to be found in this text.


Me: But when Hashem is used that is a proper name is it not? Are you saying that in both Genesis 6:4 and Numbers 16:2 this very same exact proper name which is used to address God is in the text?

Rabbi Keyak: No, but it refers to the same Hashem

Me: Ok yes I understand that. I understand there is a milliniea long debate about the identity of the Nefilim but I am not asking about them. I am asking about that very last phrase. Is it Hashem as in the name used when praying to God or is it a phrase with a different meaning?

Rabbi Keyak: Yes, anshei Sheim, for more about that you can look at Yoma 67b

Anshei Sheim is not Hashem

these were people

There you go. It is not Hashem but "anshei Sheim." Lest Tim cavil here the word "anshei" means men the same as "ish." 

The bottom line is Hashem as a proper name is NOT in the text of Genesis 6:4. If he had taken the time to actually ask questions instead of doing some kind of hit and run to get a soundbite then perhaps Tim would have learned that. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKwv8fNopIo&lc=Ugzvas2XpkPA_XCTWIx4AaABAg

Jax: My translation from the Cepher says men of the name in English. Thanks Dr.P. Glad y'all are addressing this too. Yah Bless

The God Culture: Good to see they got that right except Hashem is a name and they should have left it rather than just using another interpretation in our opinion. Yah Bless.

Not only is the proper name Hashem not to be found in Genesis 6:4 but that is not the meaning of the text. The text is not saying the Nephilim came from anyone but they they were noteworthy or famous men. The phrase translated "men of renown" is found elsewhere in the scriptures translated in the same manner as it is in Genesis 6:4. 

Numbers 16:2 And they rose up before Moses, with certain of the children of Israel, two hundred and fifty princes of the assembly, famous in the congregation, men of renown:

Funny that Tim ignores that verse. The entire video is built on Tim's imagination. 

The second lie is also found in this video:

1:00:27 We have issues with Facebook fairly regularly. In fact we were banned recently from using our own channel. Very nice.

If you listen to Tim enough you get a sense that he is being actively persecuted by Facebook and Youtube for his beliefs. But that is not the case. In a speech given on November 27th Tim divulged the exact reason Facebook recently "banned" him.

https://www.facebook.com/sabbathbc.congregation/videos/696650595063441

0:14 We recently, uh, heightened our security and when we heighten our security do you know Facebook banned us again?  Just because we heightened our security and they can't tell exactly where we're located. Well, it's none of their business where we're located. They think we're in South Africa and India and it's bouncing all over the world which is a wonderful thing but at the same time it's also caused issues

Is Timothy Jay Schwab so stupid as to not know that Facebook has protocols in place to detect suspicious activity? If Facebook cannot get a lock on your true location alarm bells are going to go off. If one day your IP address is in South Africa and the next day it's in India that will get their attention. From the sound of it Tim is using a VPN and that will definitely cause trouble for anyone using Facebook.

The reason Facebook sometimes blocks accounts using VPN is because it also keep lists of IP address ranges that are for know for VPN usage. Facebook checks your IP address every time you log in. It's one of the ways they confirm that you really are who you say you are. Another reason Facebook is so stringent about security is because a percentage of their accounts are always under attack by hackers. When you sign into your account using VPN, your IP address suddenly may not fall into the range Facebook has associated with your location. Facebook often treats this scenario as though someone's trying to hack your account.

https://securevpn.com/learn_more/How_To_Remove_a_Facebook_Account_Block_Caused_By_Using_VPN

The cold hard fact is Facebook does not care if Timothy Jay Schwab teaches about the Sabbath or the Philippines being the Garden of Eden. But they do care if he is exhibiting the behavior of a hacker. 

The God Culture: The Book That Changed The World

If there is one thing that can be said about Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture it is that he is a prideful and self-important man. T...