Sunday, October 19, 2025

The God Culture: There Is No Resurrection

Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture has a new video in which he thinks he is correcting the misunderstanding of Revelation chapter 20. The alleged misunderstanding is that there is no second resurrection or resurrection for the wicked despite the Bible saying that very thing in at least three verses. This video is based on an article Tim published in September 2025. That article will be discussed first and then whatever is to be noted from the video shall be commented upon. 

https://thegodculturephilippines.com/first-resurrection-vs.-second-death-a-clear-teaching-guide/

First Resurrection vs. Second Death: A Clear Teaching Guide 

Understanding Revelation 20 in Context 

📖 Two Distinct Groups in Revelation 20 

2 Distinct Groups 

🛡️ Believers 

  • Those in Messiah; martyrs who refused the beast

  • Partake in the First Resurrection and reign with Messiah. No Second Resurrection is mentioned. 

⚖️Unbelievers 

  • The rest of the dead (those outside the Book of Life) 

  • Remain dead until Judgment, then face the Second DeathDisappear before the 1,000 years. 

📚 Key Terms Defined 

Term                                                   Meaning                                      Who It Applies To 
First Resurrection (Rev. 20:5–6): Resurrection to eternal life and reigning with Messiah – Believers only 
Second Death (Rev. 20:14–15): Final, spiritual destruction in the lake of fire – Unbelievers only

The bolded section gives away Tim's major assumption. As I have shown in multiple reviews on this blog Tim teaches annihilationism. That is the doctrine the wicked will not suffer eternal punishment in hell but will be annihilated and no longer exist. The Bible absolutely does not teach that doctrine. It does in fact teach a resurrection to life and a resurrection to damnation. Both states are eternal.

Daniel 12:1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.

2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. 

John 5:28 Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,

29 And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.

Never forget the foundational principle that scripture interprets scripture. Simply because Revelation 20 does not have the exact phrase "Second resurrection" is no reason to discard that teaching because Jesus himself clearly taught it. 

🧠 What Revelation 20 Doesn't Say 

  • ❌ There is no such thing as a “Second Resurrection”. Second Death is not for believers and is not such.

    ❌ Sinners are not resurrected to reign. The do not live again thru the 1,000 years either because they were consumed on 1 day in scripture on the Day of Judgment. 

❌ Messiah does not only reign for 1,000 years — His reign is eternal (Rev. 11:15). The 1,000 years is the bondage period for Satan and a Sabbath repose for believers. There is no such thing as a “Millennial Reign” as he rules forever from the Day of Judgment.

There are a lot of wrong assumptions in this section. First of all Tim is limiting resurrection to meaning reigning. The resurrected saints will reign with Christ. He then says that the wicked will be "consumed on 1 day in scripture on the Day of Judgement."  This is wrong. They are cast into the Lake of Fire. Tim stops at verse 9

And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.

And neglects verses 11-15 which clearly say the wicked will be cast into the lake of fire.

11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.

12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.

14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.

15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

And what happens in the lake of fire? The wicked are tormented forever and ever.

Here is Tim's timeline of events in Revelation 20.

🧾 Revelation 20 Timeline Simplified 

1 Martyrs resurrected — First Resurrection Rev. 20:4–5 
2 Reign with Messiah — 1,000-year rest Rev. 20:4, 6 
3 Satan released briefly, judged and gone Rev. 20:7–10 
4 Final Judgment of the wicked Rev. 20:11–15 
Second Death for the wicked Rev. 20:14–15

The real timeline is this: 

  1. Satan is bound – 1,000 years begin

  2. Martyrs reign with Christ – First resurrection

  3. Satan is loosed – Gathers nations for rebellion

  4. Final battle – God destroys the enemies

  5. Satan is cast into the lake of fire

  6. Final judgment – All dead judged; Book of Life opened

  7. Death and Hell cast into the lake of fire

  8. Anyone not in the Book of Life is cast into the lake of fire

Tim is missing a lot of steps here. Most crucially Tim is missing the last step in the timeline which is the wicked are cast into the lake of fire. They are not annihilated. 

Next, Tim goes through a lot of Bible verses as well as verses from apocryphal texts to prove his point. Here is his conclusion.

🔥 Conclusion: There Is One Day of Judgment — Not Many 

  • There is one First Resurrection (for the righteous) 
  • There is one Day of Judgment (for all) 
  • There is no “second resurrection” 
  • There is a Second Death — for the ungodly, after judgment occurring at the same time 

👉 This harmonizes Yahusha’s words, the prophets, apostolic writings, and respected Hebrew apocalyptic texts. This is the manner in which Biblical exegesis should be executed attempting to reconcile the scriptures rather than a sound bite out of context.

Tim is correct that "Biblical exegesis should be executed attempting to reconcile the scriptures." Where he goes wrong is bringing in apocryphal books like Enoch and Jubilees to bolster his false assumptions. Again, that false assumption is the wicked will be annihilated rather than spend eternity in the lake of fire. 

Now, let's examine the video and see if it contains anything worth mentioning. 

The First Resurrection & The Second Death: Revelation 20 Fully Explained | The God Culture

There are in fact two things to mention from this video. The first is alleged nefarious textual additions by scholars.  This is a standard canard from magazine publisher, non-bible scholar, and admitted non-linguist (we are not linguists nor do we care to be) Timothy Jay Schwab.

15:01 Now, many English Bibles add the word again, lived not again, but it's not there. The Greek verb "anazao" appears only once in the sentence not twice and this is doctrinal insertion into the translation which really is never necessary, uh, and a poor practice for a translator.

This is reference to verse 5 of chapter 20:

But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

It's interesting that in this video Tim does not provide a slide proving his case from the Greek as he has done in the past. Instead, it's AI slop all they way through. A look at the Greek disproves Tim's claim that the word "anazao" does not appear twice in the verse. It most certainly does. 

https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/rev/20/1/t_conc_1187005

At least it appears that way. What the translators have done is broken up the word "anazao", G326, which is a compound word composed of G303 and G2198. The word literally means again live or live again. Here it is in Romans 14:9 translated as revived.
For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that he might be Lord both of the dead and living.
A literal translation of the Greek of Revelation 20:5 is as follows: 
The rest of the dead not lived again until shall have been completed the thousand years. This the resurrection first. 

Hopefully it can be seen why words are "added" to the text and word order is changed when translated into English. It is for better comprehension. Note that there are arrows on the page. These indicate several things which can be read about here 

Blueletter Bible has two words here, both Strong's G326, while elsewhere, such as at Bible Hub there is one word which is G2198. The problem here is the Textus Receptus only has "ἀνἔζησαν" , G326, while other Greek texts have "ἔζησαν", G2198, which is a different word. The first word means "lived again" while the second one "lived they." As I noted G326 has been broken apart into "lived not again" for a clearer translation. This verse in several parallels can be read here. While the exact phrasing is not the same for each Greek text, the meaning remains the same. It all depends on what Greek text is being used and since Tim is, as far as I know, a KJV guy, he should be going along with the Textus Receptus which has G326, "lived again."

What should be especially noted here is that using Strong's and other online Bible tools will not make one a sort of Hebrew and Greek expert as Tim claims. 

“Today, a regular person can go to resources like Blue Letter Bible and become a sort of Hebrew expert legitimately.”   

There are a lot of nuances which need to be sussed out and which cannot be learned without proper training. 

This verse simply means the wicked did not live again until after the 1,000 years. That is how the verse has been translated in other versions. 

New International Version
(The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended.) This is the first resurrection.

New Living Translation
This is the first resurrection. (The rest of the dead did not come back to life until the thousand years had ended.)

English Standard Version
The rest of the dead did not come to life until the thousand years were ended. This is the first resurrection.

Berean Standard Bible
The rest of the dead did not come back to life until the thousand years were complete. This is the first resurrection.

Berean Literal Bible
The rest of the dead did not live again until the thousand years shall have been completed. This is the first resurrection.

King James Bible
But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

New King James Version
But the rest of the dead did not live again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

https://biblehub.com/revelation/20-5.htm

As ever, Tim's linguistic argument can and should be outright dismissed. The word "again" appears  in the text and to say otherwise is to lie.

The other place worth mentioning is what Tim says about resurrection bodies. This ties into his annihilistic assumptions. You see, the physical bodies of believers will not be raised.  

18:40 In Hebrews 9:27 is very clear that men die once and then comes judgment. Some have asked about Enoch for instance and Elijah who remain alive according to all of scripture, especially Hebrews is very clear about that. Um, you know, the the thing is is that they're still going to die, right? But they're going to die. Their bodies are going to shed their bodies. Their spirits are going to meet Yahusha in the air. And that's the way that it works. And then comes judgment, which they will fare very well, of course. However, they will die. All men die. And there's nothing there that says otherwise. 

Now, this is very telling because if all men die once, well, there cannot be this resurrection of bodies on the day of judgment. See, that that is really misunderstood because really, you know, your body would be resurrected only to die again when you receive your new uh heavenly body, which is the way that it works. Uh we don't need the old one. It's supposed to return to dust. It says that since Adam, I mean, we know that through scripture throughout, uh, that we return to dust, uh, our bodies and our spirit lives on, awaiting the one and only day of judgment in all of scripture.

There are two errors here. One is that Enoch and Elijah, who were both translated into heaven, will return to earth, die and receive spiritual bodies. I have covered this before and you can read about it here. The second error is the denial that our physical bodies will rise. Take note that Tim does not even begin to describe what a heavenly body is. Is it something ethereal and non-corporeal?

The fact is the Bible does say our physical bodies will rise. Jesus Christ is our example and he rose with the same body he laid down. That same body is now in heaven and will remain for all eternity. This is the principle Paul is referring to in 1 Corinthians 15.

42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption:

43 It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power:

44 It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.

45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.

46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.

47 The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.

48 As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly.

49 And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.

50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.

51 Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed,

52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.

53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.

Our physical bodies shall be raised and transformed but they will be the same physical bodies we had in this life. That is what resurrection means. Tim's explanation for this resurrection, which is not in this video or article, is the doctrine of soul sleep. When a man dies his spirit goes to sleep in one of three chambers inside the earth. 

41:50 He places them in His chambers. That's where He set aside space for such in 3 categories we know from Enoch. They are not evil, yes there is one for sinners, but the chamber is not evil. It's not hell. Within the earth. Enoch said that there are 3. 1 for righteous, 1 for sinners, and 1 for martyrs who still cry out and He hears them. 

This is totally wrong because, as Paul notes, to be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord. The spirit is alive and does not need resurrecting.

Being given a new heavenly body is not a resurrection, it is an act of new creation. In essence Tim is denying the resurrection when he says our original bodies will not rise. This is anti-christian heresy beyond the pale of anything even remotely Biblical.

Even Job affirmed the resurrection:

Job 19:25 For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth:

26 And though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God:

27 Whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold, and not another; though my reins be consumed within me.

Job says in no uncertain terms he will see God in his flesh. That is the very same flesh which worms had destroyed after his death. 

This is a brief examination of Tim's latest video concerning Revelation 20. He says he published it because the Feast of Tabernacles is upcoming and the resurrection is foreshadowed by the Feast of Tabernacles. This is false as well because it really foreshadows the incarnation. You can read about that here. The fact is Tim teaches the heretical doctrine of annihilationism and ultimately denies there is any resurrection when he says our bodies will not rise. All in all it's another brick in the wall of bad theology being built by Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture. 

Thursday, September 18, 2025

The God Culture: The Book That Changed The World

If there is one thing that can be said about Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture it is that he is a prideful and self-important man. That's actually two things but they go hand-in-hand. The pride and self-importance come through in every single video he makes. Only Tim the magazine publisher has uncovered the hidden Biblical and historical truths concerning the importance of the Philippines to Bible prophecy. All the scholars who have spent their lives in Biblical studies have completely missed the plot. Tim actually believes the book he wrote, The Search For King Solomon's Treasure, has changed the world. 


How exactly has this book changed the world? I'm going to go out on a limb and say it hasn't changed the world one iota. It hasn't sold millions of copies and it hasn't been noticed en masse around the world. This book is very niche. The Search For King Solomon's Treasure is one of the worst books of revisionist history ever written. Every single page is brimming full of errors. There are numerous articles on this blog exposing them. Yet, Tim has been including this image at the end of his recent videos which are mostly AI generated.

Take a look at these images from Tim's recent videos.

📜 Return of the Lequios: Uncovering the Lost Identity of Pre-Colonial Filipinos 🇵🇭

175 Leagues to Truth: The Real Lequios Was Never Ryukyu. Return of the Lequios Part 2

Was Fernao Mendes Pinto shipwrecked in Ryukyu? Or has history been misidentified? Finding Pinto 4

What are these images? Why is there a picture of a Black Lives Matter Protest? Why is there a guy dressed like discount Alice Cooper making hand gestures? Why does Tim have a misspelled AI picture of an AI picture he already has which is spelled correctly? Yeah, sure, this one is a moving image but that's no excuse. These images and others show Tim's deliberate lack of care in crafting his newer videos. For the most part they are all rehashes of articles he published between April and June of this year and which I have already eviscerated. 

Tim was supposed to give an interview with Zen Garcia and Lisa George on September 11th, but he failed to appear. Care to guess why?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUkEPLEnSa0&lc=Ugz45XOHoiSwYIp-0yN4AaABAg

@Dreblueskies: Love when you have Tim on!!! Yay 😀 Oh no I am an hour and 8 minutes in and no Tim? So confused by the title.

@lisageorge2025: Sorry about that, Tim’s wifi shut down 15 min before the show and no matter what he tried he couldn’t reboot. He is heavily censored by the beast system…

@Dreblueskies: @lisageorge2025 Oh that is too bad. They don’t want you two speaking and sharing truth. I’m on to your next video, loving that you have both channels. 😊

Of course it's not the bad WiFi in the Philippines. It's the Beast System censoring him!! How ridiculous can one be? Everyone has WiFi problems in the Philippines. One time mine was out for half a day because a wire was snagged on the other side of town! If one is unlucky enough to have an unannounced power outage well, tough luck buddy. It happens all the time. 

Speaking of the Beast System it appears the evil Apple Corporation has defeated The God Culture.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTVeYQ8j97A&lc=Ugwq1RH31nG_RM3Xbj14AaABAg

@BabaDayk: Hope you can able to develop an app with a small amount of subscription so we can able to study all of the evidence that you have in one app and it would be very accessible any where in the world

@TheGodCulture: We tried for over 8 months and Apple blocked it. Yah Bless.

@BabaDayk: @TheGodCulture how about in android since most of the Filipinos are using android phones 

Why exactly did Apple block it? Because they don't want the truth out about Filipinos being Ophirians of course. There is NO other reason. But what about Google? Did the Playstore block it? It's so sad to see Timothy give up. It's like that time his magazine declared bankruptcy all over again. 

Timothy says he never gives up especially when it comes to finishing video series he has left hanging for years.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iyecqG0O0o&lc=UgxI-uW2DS0fOLo75qd4AaABAg

@GRAHAMHARRISOFFICIAL: What happened with the apocrypha test series? Seems like it sorta just ended after tobit

@TheGodCulture: Nope, never ended and will continue as always. We have never not completed a series and there are many. We will get back to it in time. Yah Bless. 

A guy asks when he will finish the apocrypha test series. Tim says he will get back to that series and many others eventually. That includes: the apocrypha test series, the restoring creation series, the New Moon series, the Garden of Eden Maps series, and the tithe series. There are more such as the Revelation of the Magi and Trinity series which Tim has said are forthcoming but he has yet to begin them. It's not true Tim has never finished a series. For his 100 clues series Tim gave up after Clue #52 and started placing videos in that series which had nothing to do with it. 

So far this year Tim has published 60 videos. Remove the duplicates and that's 49. Remove the non-English videos and his wife's videos and that's 39. Videos 5-13 of the Solomon's Gold LIVE Series was put together in 2024 when Tim was in Davao so that leaves 27 videos. Four of those videos are touting AI reviews and are less than 3 minutes which brings the count down to 24 videos. And what is the content of those videos? They are low effort AI slop with about ten minutes of commercials for his books at the end. 

He did spend a good three months writing ridiculous articles on his new blog which indicates some effort in the writing department. Much of that material has been made into videos and some of it will probably find its way into a book. He has claimed that he is chatting with real actual scholars about his research but it's not clear how much time that has taken or what fruit it will bear. 

The point is, ever since July 2024 when Tim travelled to Davao he has been mostly silent. He has not put out the kinds of videos which made him popular. Between April 25th and December 6th, 2024 Tim published zero videos of worth. He published clips from the Davao conferences and his wife Anna published 13 videos all in Ilocano but that's it. And he wants to complain that his YouTube stats are down and he is being purposefully throttled? It's his own fault for being so sloppy and not publishing the same kind of high-quality videos on occult and arcane subjects tangentially related to the Bible which got him 169,000 subscribers. Perhaps things will change. It could be Tim is a sleeping tiger waiting to pounce once more. Maybe we will soon see the resurrection of Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God culture. 

Monday, September 1, 2025

The God Culture: 100 Lies About the Philippines: Lie #49: Malacañang Is a Hebrew Word

Welcome back to 100 lies The God Culture Teaches about the Philippines. Today's lie concerns Timothy Jay Schwab's claim Malacañang is a Hebrew word. As we shall see that is just a lie. 


Tim makes this claim in his videos. 


Lost Tribes Series Part 2G: The Landing of the 2nd Exodus In Ophir, Philippines

32:31 Let's look at Malacañang Palace which we just saw in the northern palace but look at the word it does appear to be Hebrew indisputably. The official residence and principal workplace of the President of the Philippines located in the capital city of Manila and also the North marking a landing site of the Lost Tribes. Yep. Let's break it down. "Mal'ak" is a deputy or messenger of Yahuah God, an angel, ambassador, King in Hebrew. So is there any doubt that name has Hebrew roots? Let's keep digging. The next portion Hebrew name means brotherly or fraternal. In the Bible this is the name of a member of the tribe of Manasseh. Wow! We didn't add that to that sentence. That's exactly what the reference from FineJudaica, a Jewish website, says. And "anan", the ending, is "bring" in Hebrew. And even the "ti" in between in the words for the northern palace on the lake of the sacred journey is the prefix. In Hebrew "ti" identifies the subject of the verb as second person masculine singular and the tense of the verb as imperfect. So, check this out. Malacañang ti Amianan, Bring the Messenger of God from Manasseh to protect my people.

35:26 But this palace is the story here. This name is not an accident. Someone knew what they were doing here. Someone spoke Hebrew and hid a message in this name for us. This is impossible from any other logical point of view in our opinion.


Lost Isles of Gold LIVE Series - Part 12: Hebrew in the Philippines?

He also makes this claim in his book The Search for King Solomon's Treasure. 


The Search for King Solomon's Treasure, pg. 206

Malacañang Palace:

Name of the Presidential Palace in the Philippines
Hebrew: mal’ak: מלאך: from an unused root meaning to dispatch as a deputy; a messenger; specifically, of God, i.e. an angel (also a prophet, priest or teacher):--ambassador, angel, king, messenger. [242]

Hebrew: achyan: אחין: Hebrew name meaning “brotherly” or “fraternal.” In the bible, this is the name of a member of the tribe of Manasseh. [243]

Hebrew: anan: ענן: Bring. [244]
Our Interpretation: Righteous Priests to Bring My Brothers

This coincidentally fits the prophecy we will cover from Isaiah 60:9 and others where the Lost Tribes of Israel are literally ushered in by the ships of Tarshish which is the Philippines who are also the isles waiting for His law to be restored. Manasseh is not just any tribe but the tribe of Joseph’s oldest son. His other son Ephraim was given the birthright but in Revelation, the two tribes of Joseph’s sons are together as one. Without Manasseh and Ephraim, there can be no re-gathering of the Tribes of Israel as the birthright lies with them. Judah never received this birthright thus has no right to re-establish the land of Israel but they inherited the scepter and Messiah, who is from Judah, has possession of that scepter today and forever and it shall never depart from the throne of David as prophesied. Add to this we already covered the word Lequii referring to inhabitants of Luzon which is the name of the Grandson of Manasseh.

In fact, the Lost Tribes of Israel were also identified by region at least for one migration into an area beyond a river which the Pharisees have lost from their own Bible – the Targum Psuedo-Jonathan in Aramaic. Please note, we do not use this as scripture nor any writing of any Rabbi ever but simply the geographic name of this river where some of the Lost Tribes will be exiled and they offer extremely poor explanations because they are exploring the wrong lands. This is one of the warning verses to Israel if it breaks covenant with Yahuah.

Now, this is all nonsense. As with every other Filipino word Tim has claimed is actually a Hebrew compound word, Malacañang has an established meaning which is well documented. In 1877 Felipe Maria de Govantes documented the meaning of the name in his Compendium of the History of the Philippines. 

Felipe Maria de Govantes, Compendio de la historia de Filipinas, pg. 356

At this time, the Customs House was built behind the church of Santo Domingo, and with the Chinese passport rights, Martinez helped the State to buy the country house called Malacañan for his successors: Malacañan means fisherman's place in Spanish.

While Govantes says Malacañan means fisherman's place in Spanish what he has done in Hispanize the Tagalog. 

The earliest document to address the building's roots was the Compendio de la Historia de Filipinas written in 1877 by Spanish historian Felipe de Govantes, in which he stated that the term Malacañán meant "place of the fisherman". This was again referenced in the 1895 Historia general de Filipinas by José Montero y Vidal and the Historia de Filipinas by Manuel Artigas y Cuerva in 1916. In 1972, Ileana Maramag in her work on Malacañan history supplied the Tagalog word: mamalakáya, which means fisherman. The original denomination for the location is believed to be Mamalakáya-han, with the Tagalog suffix -han meaning "place of", later simplified by the Spanish colonial authorities as Malacañán and adapted according to the Spanish orthography.

https://kahimyang.com/kauswagan/articles/2851/history-of-malaca-ang-palace-the-official-residence-and-principal-workplace-of-the-president-of-the-philippines

That's really it. There is no need to look further into the alleged Hebrew Tim cites. The etymology is well established. As for Tim's fake etymology, not only does he misspell Malacañang on one of his slides but combing those three Hebrew words makes it six syllables instead of four. Compare Malacañang to Malak-achyan-anan.

Let's take a look at the word "anan." Tim's source number for that word is 244. In the book The Search For King Solomon's Treasure this is the reference:

The Search For King Solomon's Children, pg. 377

244. “Anan.” Strong’s Concordance #033. BibleHub.com.

But in the Sourcebook the reference is to a different number. 


While the definition on this screenshot is "bring," a look at the current website shows something completely different.

https://biblehub.com/hebrew/6049.htm

anan: To practice soothsaying, to conjure, to observe times

bring, enchanter, observer of times, soothsayer, sorcerer 

A primitive root; to cover; used only as a denominative from anan, to cloud over; figuratively, to act covertly, i.e. Practise magic -- X bring, enchanter, Meonemin, observe(-r of) times, soothsayer, sorcerer. 

The entire definition has been rewritten by Biblehub. It's association with practicing sorcery is made much more clear. While this word can be translated "bring" that is not its primary meaning. In fact, it is only translated as "bring" one time in Genesis 9:14. 

https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h6049/kjv/wlc/0-1/

Gen 9:14 And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud:ancient-hebrew an

The proper word for "bring" is either H935, H3947, or H5375.  The real meaning of Tim's fabricated phrase would  would be closer to "Messenger of God, My Brother, the Sorcerer/Cloud."

The word "anan" is Strongs #6095 so why does Tim have it labelled as Strongs's #033 in his sourcebook?

244. “Anan.” Strong’s Concordance #033. BibleHub.com. https://biblehub.com/hebrew/6049.htm

He appears to have gotten that from ancient-hebrew.org. On the bottom of the slide from his video we see these citations. 


Strong's #4397

Strong's #6049

ancient-hebrew.org #033

A search of ancient-hebrew.org yielded no results for #033. Note that this citation also contains the correct reference to "anan" as Strong's #6049. So why keep both numbers? This number also appears on the slide in a newer video published in December 2024. 


Strong's #033 is none of the words Tim alleges compose Malacañang.

https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h33/kjv/wlc/0-1/

It is Abiezrite. How does Tim get it so wrong? It's just more evidence of Tim's terrible and deeply flawed documentation methodology. 

There is simply no precedent in combining those three words. The combination does not appear in the Bible or in any other Hebrew text. Tim is literally making it all up. Hebrew doesn’t build meaning the same way Tagalog or English does. Words derive from three-letter roots, and sentence structure is governed by strict grammar rules, not arbitrary combinations. Tim's “Mal’ak-Achyan-Anan” construction would never appear in legitimate Hebrew usage.

Misrepresenting the linguistic and cultural heritage of the Philippines to fit a religious narrative not only spreads misinformation, it disrespects Filipino history and language. Claims like Tim's distort public understanding and promote a pseudo-historical ideology that can have social and political consequences. Declaring Malacañang to be a Hebrew compound word is simply one more lie from Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture.

The God Culture: There Is No Resurrection

Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture has a new video in which he thinks he is correcting the misunderstanding of Revelation chapter 20....