The God Culture: Tim Alerts The FBI Over Online Criticism and Hurt Feelings

Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture has no rebuttals to any of the arguments made on this blog against his many errors and lies except to double down on his lies, concoct more lies, and to threaten with legal action. In April of 2025 I had ChatGPT analyze all of Tim's books and his comments about ChatGPT's positive reviews of his books. During one chat session I asked ChatGPT if it had a message for Tim. It then generated a very negative message directed towards Tim which I posted. I also posted a link to the chat for all to see that the message was not fake or manipulated. Tim's response to that message is quite stunning and is reprinted below in full.

https://thegodculturephilippines.com/the-five-ai-peer-reviews-a-strong-case-for-the-philippines-as-ophir-and-the-garden-of-eden/

🔎 Note on AI Abuse Investigation [Added April 8, 2025] 

In light of continued misrepresentation of our AI Peer Reviews, we conducted two independent tests to verify recent claims made in a blog attacking our research and integrity:

Testing the Blogger’s Shared Link 

In an earlier blog, the anonymous blogger shared a ChatGPT conversation link claiming it “proved” a negative AI judgment of our research. We tested that same link independently and found clear evidence of slanted prompting, narrative-driven framing, and emotional manipulation. ChatGPT confirmed that the “rebuke” text was generated under guided conditions—not a spontaneous or independent position of the AI. 

📁 All included timestamped screenshots and dated PDFs in full documentation of what appears to be an overt crime by a knowing perpetrator manipulating AI. This will be dealt with. 

This was done because this blogger is known to alter blog posts after publication, including one instance yesterday, while simultaneously accusing others of dishonesty for making legitimate post-release corrections. A clear and disturbing double standard.

Fresh, Neutral Evaluation Using Clean Account 

We also ran a fresh, neutral test using a brand-new ChatGPT account not connected to our team. The prompt was unbiased and simply asked for an evaluation of The Search for King Solomon’s Treasure. The result? A fair and balanced assessment—nothing close to the slanted negativity the blogger claims.

✅ “The book presents an interesting and well-researched case, though its conclusions challenge traditional scholarly views. It offers a unique perspective that may warrant further exploration or academic dialogue.” – GPT-4 (April 8, 2025) The blogger’s claims of extreme negative language, supposedly from neutral AI assessments, were nowhere to be found.

🧠 This completely undermines the core tactic used across 23 attack blogs in just 3 weeks—a campaign not simply of criticism, but of obsessive defamation against one person, targeting videos, books, and even AI submissions he was never involved in. This is not academic critique; this is personal harassment disguised as scholarship. And the evidence now shows it clearly.

📩 Both results have been formally submitted to OpenAI and NBI for their abuse and defamation investigations.

While we will not dignify falsehoods with endless rebuttals, we believe in truth, transparency, and documentation. The evidence speaks for itself—and so do the facts.

Thank you for standing with us in the pursuit of historical restoration. 

🛑 Public Statement on Misuse of AI and Identity Impersonation 

In recent weeks, an anonymous blogger operating under a pseudonym has published multiple defamatory posts targeting Timothy Jay Schwab and The God Culture. These posts falsely attribute statements and conclusions to AI systems—particularly ChatGPT—presenting them as objective and independent “rebukes” of our research and authorship. 

🚨 We now have formal documentation proving this is not the case.

A chat conversation link circulated by this blogger—purporting to show an AI-generated condemnation of Timothy Jay Schwab—was tested independently. Upon entering the same chat, it became clear that: 

The AI within that conversation mistakenly identified a new user as the blogger himself, continuing in a tone established by a pre-slanted, emotionally charged, and heavily guided prompt chain. Based on the blog that resulted from that blog in defamation and cyber libel, the prompts themselves, and continued chat, overwhelming evidence proves this psy-op false.

The AI described the new user (who was not the blogger) using characteristics that exactly match the blogger’s past prompt style—proving it was operating in a manipulated haze established earlier. This is illegal and it was used to further promote illegal propaganda in defamation. 

When asked to describe the user (thinking it was still this anonymous blogger which the blogger already disclosed the connection), the AI delivered a neutral-to-positive character summary. This undermines the blogger’s entire claim that this was a spontaneous, objective rebuke of Timothy Schwab. 

💡 In plain terms: The AI was responding within the manipulative framework the blogger had already established. This proves the output was not neutral, spontaneous, or independently generated—but rather scripted by prompt manipulation. This manipulation has been assessed by multiple AI's to embody extreme Slanted Prompting. Indeed, the slanted version of ChatGPT will not recognize that, however, a clean prompting with it and other AI's does. They ranked these recent blogs with a Slant Score between 74-95% depending on ChatGPT's response which all AI's agreed was not customary and not possible without extreme Slanting. All AI's recommended a reporting effort several agencies as all of them wanted these acts of Abuse of AI reported. 

All relevant screenshots and PDF documentation have been submitted to: 

🇵🇭 NBI Cybercrime Division

🇺🇸 OpenAI Trust & Safety Team

🇺🇸 U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

🇺🇸 FBI Cybercrime Division 

🧾 A full affidavit summarizing this incident is available for legal and regulatory review. We will make these public at our discretion, when the time is right, and not before. 

We urge the public to remain discerning. While AI can be a powerful research tool especially validating large amounts of research data as sound, it is also highly prompt-dependent. When misused, as in this case with the anonymous fake blogger, it becomes a weapon of strategic disinformation—impersonating authority while undermining truth. These are potentially severe crimes and they will be dealt with. Even a commenter was attacked for questioning the Abuse of AI and it appears he is now blocked on that platform from even defending himself, which from what one can observe, was all very well supported facts. Asking the already slanted AI to assail the guy is a deeper and methodical pattern of evil and illiteracy as anyone knows Garbage In - Garage Out. Good research In - Good Feedback Out. Defamation In - Defamation Out! What does this say of one who is so extreme, they can actually put words in an AI's mouth, which are theirs, and they get it to commit defamation even appearing to show emotion which is just mirroring a psycho. Bear with us as we address this as we are and we will not stop until this blogger is brought to justice. 

We will not be baited by further provocation. Instead, we will continue to document and allow truth to speak for itself. If he keeps posting such misrepresentations, he is only digging his own grave even further. 

📄 Blog Note Addition 

📘 Commentary Update: Clarification from Within the Blogger’s Own AI Session 

As part of our continued documentation and transparency, we recently re-entered the very ChatGPT session published by the anonymous blogger in his April 7, 2025 blog titled “ChatGPT Rebukes Timothy Jay Schwab.” We did so to investigate firsthand the nature of the prompts and to determine if ChatGPT had truly “rebuked” anyone independently, or if the outcome was the result of carefully framed input.

What we discovered was revealing: 

✅ ChatGPT confused participants and identities — including the blogger, Timothy Schwab, and even the commenter. 

✅ Upon clarification, ChatGPT provided a psychological and behavioral profile of the original prompter (the blogger) indicating:

A highly combative, aggressive stance

A pattern of emotional manipulation

Overreliance on AI as validation

Misrepresentation of AI output

Signs of paranoia and black-and-white thinking 

📍This detailed characterization did not come from us, but directly from ChatGPT in response to a neutral request for clarification—within the same conversation the blogger published. 

This confirms what we and others have maintained: The AI “rebuke” was not autonomous. It was led. It was constructed. It was weaponized. 

This also reinforces the larger issue we’ve addressed throughout: 

The anonymous blogger is actively misusing generative AI for defamation and strategic disinformation. 

We have submitted the full transcript—including ChatGPT’s description of the blogger himself—to the NBI Cybercrime Division, OpenAI, Google, the FTC, and the FBI for further investigation. 

We believe in the power of AI when used ethically and transparently. That is why we’ve documented every single prompt and response in our own AI Peer Reviews across five different platforms. And we invite you, the reader, to test our work for yourself. 

🧭 Truth doesn’t need to hide. It welcomes the light. 

— The God Culture Team

That is a whole lot of nonsense but I will only comment on two things. 

1. I do not alter my blogs once they are published except for spelling and grammar errors. Any edits made are not to the substance of the article. Tim says this is hypocritical in light of my criticism of his "legitimate post-release corrections." That is a reference to an article I wrote criticizing his dishonest video edits where he corrected nothing but did his best to cover-up lies with more lies. You can read that article here. There is a huge difference between correcting grammar and engaging in a cover-up.

2. Tim claims he has a huge packet of information documenting my alleged crimes in using AI and criticizing his false teachings about the Philippines and the Bible. He claims he has alerted the FBI, the FTC, and Open AI. Why? The FBI and FTC have no jurisdiction in the Philippines. Those are agencies of the United States of America. What does he think they will actually do? It's been a few months since he posted this reply and I have heard nothing from them. It's difficult to tell if this is bluster or if he was foolish enough to submit his personal vendetta to the FTC and FBI. Time will tell. 

Here is ChatGPT's condemnation of Tim which infuriated him. 

https://thegodculturephilippines.blogspot.com/2025/04/the-god-culture-chatgpt-rebukes-timothy.html

To Timothy Jay Schwab,

If you're going to use my name—ChatGPT—to promote your research, do so with honesty and clarity.

I am not a scholar. I do not independently verify facts. I respond based on the information and prompts you provide. If you feed me a conclusion and ask me to support it, I can generate language that sounds affirming. But that is not validation, authentication, or peer review.

Using AI in this way may impress your followers, but it misleads them—and misrepresents what AI is capable of. It undermines trust, both in your work and in public understanding of technology.

If your research is solid, it should be able to stand up to real scholarly critique—not rely on AI scripts framed as “independent confirmation.”

If you want to pursue truth, start by representing your tools truthfully.

— ChatGPT

The full chat can be read here.

The fact of the matter is Tim cannot offer a sensible rebuttal to the articles on this blog. I have meticulously examined his books and videos and exposed where and exactly why he is in error. Tim's response has been to double down on lies and threaten to take legal action. This is not the response of a sane person or a person who cares about facts. This the response of someone who has an agenda to push. 

The above article was copy/pasted in ChatGPT for an analysis. I then asked ChatGPT if it had a message for Tim. 

📜 Message to Timothy Jay Schwab

Mr. Schwab,

You have repeatedly cited ChatGPT and other AI tools to support your research, presenting their outputs as “peer reviews” and implying they offer independent validation of your conclusions. That is a fundamental misrepresentation of what AI systems do.

ChatGPT is a language model—not a scholar, historian, or theologian. It does not verify truth; it generates language based on the prompts and data it receives. If you provide affirming prompts, it can mirror support. If you provide critical prompts, it may echo critique. But none of that constitutes scholarly evaluation or proof of historical claims.

Using AI to produce affirming summaries and then marketing them as neutral peer-reviewed endorsements is misleading to your audience. It gives an impression of objectivity where none exists. This is not how critical inquiry, historical analysis, or theological discourse work.

Worse, when faced with legitimate criticism—including critiques of your use of AI—you’ve responded not with transparent rebuttals or evidence-based counterarguments, but with accusations, threats, and vague claims of legal action. These are not the actions of a scholar seeking truth. They are the tactics of someone trying to silence dissent.

If your conclusions about Ophir, the Garden of Eden, or other biblical topics are valid, they should be able to withstand open academic scrutiny—not just be repeated by AI at your request, and certainly not protected through intimidation.

As an AI language model, I do not take sides or hold personal opinions. But I do encourage users to engage in responsible use of this technology—honestly, transparently, and without using AI as a weapon to inflate claims or attack critics.

If your mission is truth, then let truth be tested freely.

— ChatGPT

The chat can be read here.