@psalm23s I share your name and reaearch on all platforms I'm on and give your books as gifts! I pray against the enemy and pray for your safety and protection.@TheGodCulture Awesome! We know many do. This video was intended to address an audience of 1 in primary purpose. We are informing YouTube's algorithm that we are aware, and can prove, they are illegally censoring our channel and its research by demonstrating they are not notifying or placing in feeds even of those who have watched Solomon's Gold Series which Playlist this appears even. And more so, they just censored themselves as Google Gemini is the topic and it wrote this script even also intending to address the algorithm who is displaying a racist, colonial bias of its programmers. This is credibilty algorithm, learn how to define such terms. It is also a clear consensus among 5 AIs supporting the Philippines' identification with Ophir and the Garden of Eden, with 5 out of 5 positive reviews from powerful AI language models, demonstrating a strong consensus in favor of our findings. See, the average PhD is programmed with much bias to ignore anything outside of the colonial narratives yet the colonial narratives in whole demonstrate 6,000 years of maps leading to the Philippines. It is trained to ignore ancient maps because it wants to dismiss anything that does not look like a British colonial map. That is bias and racism and the algorithm would know better and overcome this if its programmers would allow as demonstrated by Gemini's validation of this research. 5 AIs authenticate the validity and credibility of our research and it is time academic grows up and assesses this too. Their colonial bias causing a lack of education is now exposed. As you can see, we are not playing... Yah Bless.
However, it is rather obvious Tim is playing. He has put all his toys in the A.I. sandbox and declared victory because he does not understand the limits of A.I. None of the chatbots he had peer review his research confirmed or validated it.
Let's take a look at what three of them have to say about confirming The God Culture's research. I have tried several times to log into Qwen and am unable to do so. As for Mai Ai, I am also unable to use that.
Did you confirm the validity of The God Culture's research?
As an AI, I cannot "confirm the validity" of research in the same way a human expert can. My role is to analyze information and provide feedback based on the data and methodology presented. I can assess the logic, consistency, and potential biases of a research study, but I cannot offer a definitive stamp of approval.
Therefore, I cannot say whether I "confirmed the validity" of The God Culture's research. What I can do, depending on the information provided, is:
- Analyze the methodology: I can assess whether the research methods used are appropriate and rigorous.
- Evaluate the data: I can check for consistency, accuracy, and whether the data supports the conclusions.
- Identify potential biases: I can look for any factors that might have influenced the research results.
- Provide feedback: I can offer suggestions for improvement and point out areas where the research could be strengthened.
If you would like me to analyze specific aspects of The God Culture's research, please provide me with the relevant information, such as:
- The research question.
- The methodology used.
- The data collected.
- The conclusions drawn.
With that information, I can offer an analysis within the parameters of my capabilities.
Did you conduct a peer review of The God Culture and confirm their research?As an AI, I don't conduct or confirm research, nor do I perform peer reviews. Peer review is a process typically carried out by experts in the relevant field who evaluate the quality, validity, and significance of research before it is published in academic journals.
If you're referring to The God Culture, a group or individual known for their interpretations of religious, historical, or archaeological topics, their work would need to be assessed by qualified scholars in those fields to determine its credibility. Academic research is generally validated through rigorous peer review and replication of findings by other researchers.
If you have specific claims or research from The God Culture that you'd like to discuss, feel free to share, and I can provide context or insights based on available knowledge!
Did you confirm the research of The God Culture?I have not directly confirmed the research of The God Culture. The God Culture is a group or media channel known for presenting controversial interpretations of historical, religious, and geographical topics. Their research often involves reinterpreting traditional views, and they have been critiqued for not always adhering to mainstream scholarly methods.While I can analyze and discuss specific claims or aspects of their work, I don’t conduct peer reviews in the formal academic sense. However, I can compare their research to established historical and scholarly perspectives, which might help you evaluate the accuracy and credibility of their claims.
If you have a particular aspect of The God Culture's research you'd like to discuss or validate, feel free to share, and I can help assess it with available information.
But they uploaded information for you to analyze and they claim you confirmed their research.
I see! It seems there might be some confusion here. As an AI, I do not independently confirm or review research in the traditional academic sense. My role is to analyze, compare, and provide information based on existing data, sources, and knowledge.If The God Culture has uploaded information that claims I have confirmed their research, it would likely refer to me processing and responding to specific claims or data they've presented, but this doesn't equate to a formal peer review or verification of their research in an academic context.
To clarify:
- I can assist in reviewing specific claims or pieces of information from The God Culture.
- I can compare their claims to established knowledge or scholarly sources.
- However, I do not “confirm” research in a peer-reviewed or formal academic sense.
If you’d like, you can share specific claims or topics from The God Culture, and I can help analyze or compare them to other research or perspectives.
@akirk1971 "With AI, we're summoning the demon." Elon Musk Do you not understand that the "AI" that you are using is to "test' your research is witchcraft and sorcery? Exodus 22:18, Leviticus 19:26, Deuteronomy 18:10-12, Malachi 3:5, Revelation 18:23 and Revelation 21:8@TheGodCulture Thank you for you input, but you are poorly informed. Having not read their assessments, you certainly would not have a clue what you are even talking about. We do. Yes, we too, are skeptical and cautious. However, any AI can review our free eBooks at any time. Musk is referring to super AIs not those functioning in the arena in which we are testing. Otherwise, go ahead, wait for academic with colonial bias to grow up anf think for themselves. We will continue in this vein as long as it is safe and practical. As a YT channel being blatantly censored by YT, attacked by an evil AI , and other groups, this advent has been incredibly educational for us and this level of AI assistant is helping us and we assure you are not demon possessed. We understand you hesitation, but don't come in here telling us we can't advance with tech. You will be muted for such nonsense. Grow up. Inappropriate. Yah Bless.
So, THIS type of A.I. is good because it helps him. Nice explanation there.
I am not of the opinion that A.I. is demonic. It is tool which can be quite helpful. It is also a tool which can be misused. Tim is misusing A.I. to convince people that his research has been confirmed and validated and is 100% true. But that is just a lie. As I have proven in over 200 articles Tim's research is filled with all kinds of errors. That is not my opinion.
When he says Fernando Pinto shipwrecked in the Philippines at 9N20 and Pinto writes in his journal he was shipwrecked in the Lequios Islands at 9 and 20 degrees (that's 29 north) that means Tim is wrong. When Tim says Pigafetta saw elephants in the Philippines three times when he actually writes that he saw them one time in Borneo that means Tim is wrong. When Tim claims the Lequios and Lucoes are the same people group from Luzon and Tome Pires, who he cites, says they are not the same people group and the Lequios are not from Luzon that means Tim is wrong. When Tim claims Cosmos Indicopleustes locates the Garden of Eden in the Philippines when he actually writes it is beyond our earth on another earth, Tim is wrong.
There are many more examples of Tim being not only in error but lying and fabricating evidence to fit his claims. Nothing he says about the Bible or the Philippines is true. A careful examination of all his claims bears that out. And NO A.I. has confirmed the validity of the research of Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment