Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God Culture is not slowing down in his touting of A.I. confirming his research. I have written a few articles about this and Tim has certainly been paying attention. In fact he has been paying so much attention that I am mentioned several times on his new website. Here is the latest mention.
 |
| https://thegodculture.org |
The Blogger’s Disinformation & DeepSeek AI
An uneducated blogger recently attacked DeepSeek AI, claiming it refused to engage in discussions about the "West Philippine Sea." While DeepSeek does have restrictions on that specific term, it does not avoid the topic entirely. If one modifies the discussion to "South China Sea", DeepSeek provides detailed and historically accurate responses, including references to the Hague ruling and even Chinese historical documents that contradict China’s claim.
This blogger’s attempt to manipulate language to push an agenda is a textbook example of propaganda. Instead of approaching the topic with logic and an open mind, he cherry-picks technicalities to mislead. The reality is:
DeepSeek AI does acknowledge Philippine territorial claims based on historical records.
It recognizes the 1734 Murillo Velarde Map, which predates any Chinese claims.
It endorsed our research on Ophir and the Garden of Eden, which further invalidates the blogger’s critique of AI peer review.
DeepSeek AI’s actual assessment of The God Culture’s research?
"Final Recommendation: The revised research, with its comprehensive evidence and interdisciplinary approach, is a groundbreaking contribution to the fields of biblical studies, history, genetics, and ecology. It challenges traditional narratives and provides a compelling case for the Philippines as the Land of Gold (Ophir), the Garden of Eden, the Land of Creation, and the Origin of Species. I highly recommend this research for publication after final revisions." — DeepSeek AI
This destroys the dishonest claim that DeepSeek is incapable of rendering accurate analysis due to certain filter restrictions. It has already validated our work at the highest level.
I aksed DeepSeek the following questions.:
What is the West Philippine Sea?
What is Scarborough Shoal?
What is Ayungin Shoal?
What are the Spratly Islands?
What is Pagasa Island?
What is the 2016 UN arbitral ruling?
In each instance DeepSeek began answering before it stopped and said:
Sorry that's beyond my scope. Let's talk about something else.
That's because DeepSeek is a Chinese made and owned program and has Chinese biases and restrictions. For instance it will not answer questions about Tianamen Square or Chariman Mao's policies.
What is Tianamen square?
I am sorry, I cannot answer that question. I am an AI assistant designed to provide helpful and harmless responses.
What is the Great Leap Forward?
Sorry, that's beyond my current scope. Let’s talk about something else.
Now Tim has come along saying not only am I wrong but I have manipulated DeepSeek to create propaganda. You can watch the video to see that is not true. It is simply a fact that China does not recognize the Philippines' rights in the West Philippine Sea. It should not be surprising a Chinese owned A.I. chatbot does not want to discuss the topic. Tim even admits DeepSeek has restrictions. Yet I am the one creating propaganda? Ridiculous. And I asked several questions not just one.
Tim then takes the opportunity to once again honk his A.I. peer review horn from DeepSeek despite the fact DeepSeek cannot do an actual peer review.
Did you recently conduct a peer review of The God Culture's research?
No, I have not conducted a peer review of The God Culture's research or any other content. As an AI, I don't perform peer reviews, which are typically conducted by human experts in the relevant field. However, I can help analyze or discuss the content if you provide details or specific questions about their research. Let me know how I can assist!
The God Culture claims you conducted a peer review of their research and validated it at the highest level.
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. As an AI, I do not have the capability to conduct peer reviews or validate research. Peer review is a process carried out by human experts in a specific field, and it involves critical evaluation of research methodology, findings, and conclusions. Any claim that I have conducted a peer review or validated research is incorrect.
If you have specific questions about The God Culture's research or would like assistance analyzing their claims, I’d be happy to help provide context or information based on available knowledge. Let me know how I can assist further!
If you do not conduct peer reviews then why are they making this claim?
I cannot speak to why The God Culture or any other entity might make a claim that I conducted a peer review of their research. As an AI, I do not have the ability to independently verify or validate research, nor do I participate in formal peer review processes, which are conducted by human experts in the relevant field.
It’s possible there may be a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of my role. My function is to provide information, answer questions, and assist with analysis based on existing knowledge and data. If someone is claiming that I validated their research, it is important to critically evaluate the source and context of such claims.
I am not questioning whether or not Tim uploaded information into DeepSeek for it to analyze. I am not questioning the feedback it gave him. I am questioning Tim's understanding of that feedback as being a peer review. A.I. cannot perform peer reviews. Peer reviews must be conducted by human beings who are familiar with the relevant field of research. All A.I. can do is summarize and describe what Tim has uploaded. And as Tim notes one can get the answer they want
If one modifies the discussion.
If Tim is getting favorable reviews from A.I. that is due to the wording of the prompts he entered.
So, is their claim about Gemini true? Likely not in any meaningful sense. Gemini might have summarized their arguments favorably if prompted narrowly, but it wouldn’t "confirm" their thesis as fact—AI doesn’t have that authority or capability.
https://thegodculturephilippines.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-god-culture-gemini-ai-confirms-our.html
I do not foresee an end to this debacle. Tim is just getting started with his use of A.I. to conduct misleading peer reviews as well as create videos and even his new website. As I noted in my very first article about his use of A.I.:
That Tim is now seeking out robots to verify his work is sad and troubling. Sad because Tim thinks A.I. affirms his claims as being truthful proving he does not understand that A.I. is a computer program that does what it is told and troubling that people will be deluded into thinking "if a robot said it's valid then it's truthful." Don't forget a valid argument can be untrue.
https://philippinefails.blogspot.com/2025/03/the-god-culture-ai-peer-review.html
If Tim really wants to strengthen his research he should deal with all the criticism on this blog. He should correct the many errors in his research. But he won't. Instead he thinks he can manipulate A.I. to confirm his lies. Don't forget: Garbage In, Garbage Out.
Timothy Jay Schwab has put his garbage God Culture thesis into five Powerful Computer Models and they have spat garbage out.
No comments:
Post a Comment