The God Culture: ChatGPT Refutes Tim's Claims About The Qumran Community

Timothy Jay Schwab who is The God culture is currently running all his research through various A.I. chatbots in an attempt to make it appear as if all he teaches is legitimate, valid, sound, and true. The latest bit of research to get the treatment are his theories about the Dead Sea Scroll Community. According to Tim ChatGPT affirmed his Dead Sea Scroll Community research as "irrefutable."

https://thegodculture.org/breaking-dead-sea-scrolls-more-than-we-have-been-told/

"Conclusion

This Peer Review fully endorses the research without revision. The findings are logically sound, historically accurate, and biblically supported. The misrepresentation of Qumran as an Essene monastery is one of the greatest academic deceptions of our time, and this research effectively dismantles that falsehoodwith irrefutable evidence.

- ChatGPT AI

Now, as I have explained before Tim is getting these favorable reviews solely due to the way he has framed his questions to ChatGPT and not because his research is actually irrefutable. This fact has been explained in several articles and I refer the read to them. 

So, what happens when ChatGPT analyses Tim's Dead Sea Scroll Community research free of biased questioning? It get's an unfavorable review. That is at odds with Tim's claim here so of course the natural thing to do was to ask ChatGPT to compare both reviews and figure out why they are so different. It then concludes that the critical review is more reliable. The review is based on the information in Tim's books Enoch, 2 Esdras, Jubilees, and Apocrypha Vol. 1 and 2. The introduction of each book discusses Tim's Dead Sea Scroll Community research at length.

What follows is a screenshot of the entire chat. Take note that I asked ChatGPT no leading questions. I only asked it to analyze the data. Don't forget Tim says:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2LuUh0SRcc&lc=UgwCnF_vMV2x7uRcx_h4AaABAg

Who said TGC needs AI's to validate their research? Not TGC. Who said they are the "best authority?" Not TGC. They are computers or Large Language Modules capable of absorbing and assessing the logic and soundness of an position. That is all we are using them for and already a successful step in the right direction. We will continue to do so. Yah Bless.

ChatGPT has absorbed and assessed the logic and soundness of Tim's position without any leading prompts. The verdict is not favorable.