Continuing the analysis of Timothy Jay Schwab's research via A.I. it is now time to look at the Search for King Solomon's Treasure Sourcebook. Tim is very proud of this book because it has so many sources. He claims that it proves the validity and rigor of his research. But ChatGPT has a completely different take.
I uploaded both Solomon's Treasure and the Sourcebook into ChatGPT and asked for an analysis.
I have uploaded two PDFs. One is The search For King Solomon's Treasure and the other is the sourcebook for The Search for King Solomon's Treasure. Analyze the author's use of sources. Point out any and actual and possible errors. Assess the strength and quality of the research based on the sources used to support the research.
The first assessment was too short so I asked for a more expansive review.
Produce an extensive more in-depth analysis of the sourcebook and the main text. Assess the author's claims about the sources he uses and the methodology in his use of these sources.
I then asked ChatGPT to review the merits of the Sourcebook on its own.
Focusing only on the sourcebook analyze the sources as to their validity, soundness, and truth. Analyze the notes and comments the author has on his sources in the sourcebook and include them in the analysis of the sourcebook.
ChatGPT did not have a positive conclusion in its analysis. This judgement is important because these sources are a fundamental part of Tim's claims and he has likely uploaded them to ChatGPT and other A.I. chatbots to get confirmation of his research.
How is it that uploading raw data for A.I. to review gets negative results while Tim is getting positive reviews of that same data? I have already answered that. It depends on what he is uploading and what questions he is asking. Here is a screenshot of the chat.
No comments:
Post a Comment